Recently, netizens broke the news that a senior at Shandong University of Technology abused stray cats. While the cat is still alive, it is tortured by cruel methods such as skinning, digging intestines, burning, electric shock, etc., and shooting videos and selling them online. Most of them were school stray cats, and 80 died within two months. In response, Shandong University of Technology responded that it was a student of the school. At present, all videos of the student have been deleted and the matter is under further investigation.
(the video will not be shown)
Yesterday Shandong University of Technology responded that it will further investigate and deal with it seriously in accordance with laws and regulations;
Fan Yuanqing apologized and expressed deep regret.
No, no, you have no regrets.
look at the apology book
and then look at the screenshots of the conversation with the netizens before
The focus of killing small animals is not to kill, but to abuse.
has read a psychological literature on animal cruelty, and there are several points for reference:
1. Studies have shown that animal cruelty is the result of lack of empathy.
Empathy is an important concept of humanistic psychology. It refers to an individual's ability to recognize and understand the emotions and emotions of others by putting oneself in the position, and to release thoughtfulness and caring. Empathy acts as a motivation to cause altruism and suppress violent behavior. Animal cruelty can interfere with the development of children's empathy, and may affect subsequent attitudes and behaviors, including crimes. Parents' violence against their children may be caused by parents' lack of empathy, which may become an obstacle to the development of empathy in childhood. Lack of empathy will in turn encourage animal cruelty and other violent or ruthless behaviors. However, lack of empathy is only a potential inducement for animal cruelty. It is not certain that lack of empathy will lead to cruelty. 2. The psychology community also believes that animal cruelty may also be a manifestation of psychological depression, and to a large extent it is a way to vent depression and relieve tension. If children are prone to abusive behavior, this is because children’s behavioral language and cognitive abilities are poor, and the way of expressing emotions is relatively simple. They have not formed a more mature psychological defense mechanism, so they use animal abuse to relieve their psychological depression. 3. If there is a serious sense of inferiority, it will also encourage the individual to abuse animals. 4. American researchers have found that children who abuse animals may have violent tendencies when they grow up. In the identification of forensic mental illness, some of the "patients" who have committed homicide and other criminal records can more or less find them in their childhood. One of the bad "brands" of "Animal Cruelty" is a distorted mind. The current evidence suggests that animal cruelty may induce interpersonal violence. In one study, the subjects were 267 college students majoring in psychology, and 18% of the subjects admitted that they had abused animals as a child. The act of abuse is defined as: (a) once killed a pet; (b) once killed a stray or wild animal; (c) once injured or tortured an animal, teased it or caused pain; (d) once Touching an animal sexually; (e) having had sex with an animal (except hunting, euthanasia, and killing for food). "Animal" includes all animals. The most common is the killing of a stray or wild animal (especially rodents, birds), followed by torturing the animal, hurting or making fun of the animal, causing pain to the animal. Almost all individuals who reported a history of cruelty to animals support corporal punishment. Animal cruelty not only has a negative impact on benevolence and compassion, but also may prompt subjects with a history of animal cruelty to use violence against other individuals in the society, and then the perpetrator is likely not to feel guilty for such violence, and may This violence will happen again. Therefore, animal cruelty and violent behavior are related to a certain extent. Children who have animal cruelty behavior may have violent behavior after adulthood, or have a more tolerant attitude towards violent behavior. Reference textPresented by: Chen Yongjin, Cheng Wei, & Lu Kangjian. (2010). The current research status of the relationship between empathy, animal cruelty and violent behavior. Journal of Lanzhou Education College (02), 71-74.
Currently, there is no clear law and regulation in my country. The abuse of stray cats is regulated and punished, but it is illegal to post similar videos online even if they are not sold.
In recent years, this kind of news has frequently appeared in our sight, and we don’t know how many things have not been revealed. More importantly, there are many great young people who are still going to school in the ivory tower! If there are more and more people like this, you are walking on the road, and a little cat and puppy who is clinging to your legs and begging for food, you are planning to pick it up or find someone to adopt or something. The next day you saw it raging in the wilderness, covered in blood.
Cats and dogs are life, you don’t like it, but at least respect it as life, and you can see it every day in life, is it so difficult for you to keep it alive?
For the sake of profit, there is no resistance at all to torture. You are hungry outside all the year round, and you may die one day. This is what you do as a college student, a so-called higher-educated person?
This is really free for you during the epidemic holiday.
I read the comments on Weibo. Many people discuss this issue in the category of "ethics, ethics, and personality". I think it's totally wrong.
Violence is an instinctive evil deeply rooted in the human heart. Everyone has
.
When facing small animals and the weak, most people will have such an impulse in their lives.
remember very clearly, Zhihu once had a question about discussing "bear children", and the most praised one turned out to be "a punch to death".
is just that this impulse is restricted under the constraints of social morality. The reason why people are called humans is not because they have a human face and can speak while walking upright, but because they have a human nature different from beasts.
I believe you must have seen the news, "Currently the British elderly are forced to agree to give up first aid for the epidemic".
There are also many people discussing "Will this epidemic solve the problem of aging Western society, so as to get rid of the burden and usher in a new wave of prosperity?"
what?
look, look!
No country on the earth is built on the basis of moral decay, only great countries are destroyed because of moral decay, and no great country rises because of moral decay! This kind of thinking is so simple.
Many media players like to describe Western society as a "moral paradise", put them on the moral commanding heights, criticize their own citizens, and profit from it. In this case, we must stick to the moral bottom line.
Regarding Fan Yuanqing’s cat abuse incident, the overwhelming majority of people have a clear and firm stance: this kind of person should be properly punished. Shouting, screaming, and killing is unnecessary. Randomly expanding the scope of violence is itself an attack on morality. For this matter, what we want to see is to give this person the greatest degree of punishment within the scope permitted by law.
Shandong University of Technology's response
or the sentence "The focus of killing small animals is not killing, it is torture." The essence of
to prevent cruelty to animals is actually the value of protecting human nature. This is an offense to humanity. Human nature is interlinked. I believe that any kind person will not do this kind of thing out of human instinct, and the harm to people who can do this kind of thing is not only for stray cats.
Wish you and I can keep the good in my heart, refuse to abuse and love life.
