(The author is Yu Lisheng, a special commentator of Lizhi News, a senior commentator; this article is an exclusive draft of Lizhi News client and Lizhi.com, please indicate the source for reprinting.)
Second in written test, first in interview, first in total score However, due to her pregnancy, Zou Xiaolin, a woman from Henan Province, was unable to have a chest X-ray during the physical examination, so she was not admitted in the end and missed the job of a teacher she wanted. After many reports and seeking help to no avail, Xiao Xu decided to take up legal weapons to protect his legitimate rights and interests. On December 11, Xiao Xu sued Bureau of Human Resources and Social Security and Bureau of Culture and Education of Plain Demonstration Zone, Xinxiang City, Henan Province. The case will be held in Yuanyang County The people's court opened a trial.
Because Zou Xiaolin is pregnant, the lack of physical examination items without chest X-ray is the result of weighing the pros and cons. Children are the most important thing after all. During the physical examination at that time, the hospital staff said: Pregnant women cannot have a chest X-ray, as long as they provide a pregnancy test report that proves pregnancy.
However, what she then received was a notice of rejection due to lack of physical examination. Well, this means that pregnant women cannot participate in the local teacher recruitment. At that time, there were 5 other pregnant women who also entered the physical examination with her, but they were also rejected one by one.
But even if she rushed to the hospital immediately and begged for a risky chest X-ray, even if she wrote a letter of commitment stating that the hospital would not be liable if something went wrong, she was rejected. Because the hospital has regulations: it is forbidden to do chest X-rays for pregnant women. Chest x-ray is a radiological examination: X-rays are used to penetrate the human body to check whether there are diseases in the lungs; in the early pregnancy, embryo development is relatively sensitive, and receiving X-rays may cause embryo miscarriage, deformity and other adverse consequences.
Since the person concerned is not at fault for not having a chest X-ray, she should not be made to bear any adverse consequences; otherwise, it would be unscientific and unfair.
In fact, the physical examination standards for public recruitment of teachers refer to the physical examination standards for civil servant recruitment, including the physical examination notice issued by the Human Resources and Social Security Bureau and the Culture and Sports Bureau of the Pingyuan Demonstration Area at that time, which also clearly mentioned: "The physical examination refers to the relevant standards and regulations for civil servant recruitment proceed." In civil service recruitment, how to deal with the problem that pregnant candidates cannot have chest X-rays?
As early as 2009, National Civil Service Bureau made a "Reply to Questions about Pregnant Candidates Participating in Physical Examination", which clearly and detailedly pointed out: "Candidates are pregnant during the physical examination, so they can temporarily not perform gynecology during the physical examination. Inspection of items such as X-ray and X-ray... The recruitment is postponed. When the candidate can undergo gynecology and X-ray inspection after the end of pregnancy, he will complete the physical examination and make a conclusion on whether the physical examination is qualified. After passing the physical examination, publicity and filing will be carried out in accordance with relevant procedures. "
Searched the Internet, and found that all parts of the country are operating according to the "suspension of recruitment", and there is no simple and rude "one size fits all" and direct rejection like this time.
When responding to Zou Xiaolin and other pregnant candidates, a leader of the Cultural and Sports Bureau of the Pingyuan Demonstration Zone mentioned: "It was because the previous batch of recruited pregnant women was too many, which led to the optimization of the plan this time." Candidates for pregnant women who have not undergone chest X-rays are rejected directly because of the lack of items in the physical examination.
For such a clear right and wrong, the relevant local departments should correct the mistakes in time. The parties must be forced to the point of resorting to the courts to seek an explanation after a long period of time and nowhere to seek redress. Isn't this exposure a kind of arrogance and indifference? There should also be serious accountability for such indiscretion in decision-making and inaction in error correction.
In recent years, with the deepening of the aging society in our country and the reduction of the demographic dividend, a series of adjustments have been made to the birth policy, fully liberalizing the second child and encouraging birth; however, the public's willingness to have children is still relatively insufficient.
Looking at this background, all employers should respect women's equal employment rights, provide convenience and care for pregnant women's employment, and reduce the burden of childbearing for the public; government agencies, public institutions and other public departments should especially take the lead Setting an example, instead of ignoring major policies and having no sense of the overall situation, allowing women to linger painfully between childbearing and work, making the difficult choice of "choosing one of the two".
