(In the vast crowd, meeting is a kind of fate, if you like it, please pay attention to Hua Yuhan)
Hua Yuhan | Text
It is no exaggeration to say that " Bottom Line " is a movie that can trigger every second A thought-provoking TV show. The short stories and gossips of
's parents are magnified and discussed in "Bottom Line". In addition to the guidance of the Supreme Court,
also has the ingenuity of the screenwriters.
not only presented wonderful stories, but also tried to interact and discuss with the audience through cases.
is like this "profound and mysterious" "Fu Dalong case".
seems to be Song Yufei who has found more possibilities and loopholes in the seemingly irrefutable evidence.
actually brought us a legal problem of "euthanasia".
Although Bottom Line didn't end up wrestling too much with this issue, it managed to get my attention and ponder.
From my shallow understanding, those pains from the inside out may be the main reason why most sober people seek "euthanasia".
For example, Fu Dalong's father, a patient with advanced cancer, suffers from the pain that most people who have never suffered from cancer can personally experience and understand.
is under the majesty of the law.
Fu Dalong has to face the condemnation of morality and human relations with his uncle.
The attending doctor has to face the constraints and accountability of laws and regulations.
, the father who suffered the pain of bone erosion, has to face the basic rights that a person should have.
This is the right to choose between life and death, this is the right to choose between a dignified life or a miserable death. The saddest thing about
is that when the attending doctor came to court, he said so little.
He did not further discuss the pain of the patient, especially the pain of waiting for death.
And Song Yufei in court also lacked the ability to write Fang Yuan's "mother-in-law" judgment.
Maybe she can express some opinions or opinions on euthanasia. This time the trial will be more meaningful.
may be precisely because of the lack of legislation and the unclear definition of euthanasia.
made this "Bottom Line" filmed under the guidance of the "Supreme Law" to mention the situation of family members and patients requesting "euthanasia".
is precisely because there are reasonable demands and reasonable attitudes. Only
makes this kind of behavior form some gray areas in law and medicine.
It is illegal for Fu Dalong to use "fentanyl" to "euthanize" his father.
So how do you define whether "conservative treatment" and "extubation" that are agreed or recommended by a doctor are illegal?
If the patient is in excruciating pain, because he can't bear it and can't get relief from "euthanasia", he will seek short-sightedness.
So, should this be considered "suicide" or "euthanasia"?
In other words, the legal definition of "euthanasia" is illegal.
is just to set a door and a lock for the living, so as to prevent social downturn or unbearable consequences after letting go.
From a global perspective, "euthanasia" has different legal definitions and regulations in different countries.
So, there is such a problem.
If Fu Dalong takes his father to a country where "euthanasia" is legal.
and "euthanized" his own father as permitted by doctors and local laws.
So when he returns home with his father's ashes, what kind of trial will he face?
There is a long way to go, and I will search up and down.
Perhaps this is the greatest significance of "The Bottom Line".
Perhaps this is the deeper meaning that the Supreme Court has given to The Bottom Line.
legislation never ends,Making the law stand and work is the common struggle of all legal practitioners.
Wonderful review of the past: "The Bottom Line" blindly pursues career and ideals, who cares about family and children?
(remember to pay attention to "Hua Yuhan" after reading, the picture comes from the Internet)
