According to media reports, the island's anti-corruption unit recently searched the home of former Taipei Mayor Ko Wenzhe and found a USB flash drive with "2022/11/1 Xiao Shen 1500 Shen Qingjing" clearly written on it. Some media interpreted it as "15 million yuan", while others

According to media reports, the island's anti-corruption unit recently searched the home of former Taipei Mayor Ke Wenzhe and found a USB flash drive with "2022/11/1 Xiao Shen 1500 Chong Qing Jing" clearly written on it. Some media interpreted it as "15 million yuan", while others thought it was the time point of "15:00". Some media reporters clearly stated on Facebook, "On August 30, the anti-corruption inspector searched Ke Wenzhe's home and seized hard drives and USB flash drives. We have exclusive control of it, and it was clearly recorded that (Weijing Group owner) Shen Qingjing paid 15 million." Former Republican representative Guo Zhengliang questioned on the 9th that the media had exclusive control on August 30? More powerful than a judge? If the prosecutor obtains the USB flash drive, can he not let the court know about it? When the court ruled, was the USB flash drive handed over? This USB flash drive existed on August 30. Why was it not handed over to the court? Why were the evidence held by the Taipei District Prosecutor's Office not handed over to the Taipei District Court? Do you want to do this?

Guo Zhengliang said bluntly that it is because the money has not been found that people think that the crime of profit is too abstract, so they are discussing it now, otherwise what is there to discuss? For example, former Taoyuan Mayor Zheng Wencan did not have a DPP to speak for him.

Guo Zhengliang emphasized that the important point is that the reporter wrote that he saw the contents of the USB flash drive on August 30. At that time, the Taipei District Court had not yet opened a detention court. Was the case handled in this way? This reporter broke the news and killed himself, and the Beijing prosecutor’s informants are ready to die! Kill a bunch of people!

In addition, Taipei City Councilor Hou Hanting from the New Party believed on the 9th that the People's Party should sue the Beijing Prosecutor's Office for committing the crime of profiteering, because the Beijing Prosecutor's Office also knowingly violated the law and violated the investigation by not making it public, but made profits to specific media, allowing it to gain widespread Benefit. Now that the report has been exposed and has indeed received traffic, if the People's Party wants to turn from defense to offense, it can sue the North Korean prosecutors for illegal activities and profiteering.

Straits Herald Taiwan Correspondent Lin Jingxian