According to the following regulations, if you are in the first two use cases, then not.
According to Article 22 of the Copyright Law of the People’s Republic of China: In the following cases, you can use a work without the permission of the copyright owner and pay no remuneration to him. However, the name of the author and the name of the work shall be specified, and the copyright owner shall not infringe Other rights enjoyed by this law:
(1) for personal study, research or appreciation, and use of works that have been published by others;
(2) for introducing, commenting on a certain work or explaining a certain issue, appropriately quoting others in the work Published works;
(3) is to report current affairs news, inevitably reproduce or quote published works in newspapers, periodicals, radio stations, television stations and other media;
(4) Newspapers, periodicals, radio stations, television stations and other media Publish or broadcast current affairs articles on political, economic, and religious issues that have been published by other newspapers, periodicals, radio stations, television stations, and other media, unless the author declares not to publish or broadcast;
(5) newspapers, periodicals, radio stations, Television stations and other media publish or broadcast speeches made at public gatherings, unless the author declares that publication or broadcast is not allowed;
(6) is for school classroom teaching or scientific research, translating or copying a small amount of published works for teaching or scientific research personnel Use, but shall not publish and distribute;
(7) State agencies use published works within a reasonable range for the performance of official duties;
(8) Library, archives, memorial halls, museums, art galleries, etc. are required for display or preservation of versions , Copy the works collected by the museum;
(9) free performance of published works, the performance does not charge the public, nor pay the performers;
(10) for works of art installed or displayed in outdoor public places Copying, painting, photography, and video recording;
(11) translate works written in Chinese language and written by Chinese citizens, legal persons or other organizations into works in minority languages for publication and distribution in China;
(12) will The published works will be published in Braille. The provisions of the preceding paragraph of
shall apply to restrictions on the rights of publishers, performers, producers of audio and video recordings, radio stations, and television stations.
Now there are many self-media publishing such short videos. As for infringement and non-infringement, let's put it aside. The editing and dissemination of a certain film of
must be approved by the copyright holders. Large companies must not dare to start this. So
has a lot of self-media and uses it directly for editing. If
owns the copyright, even if you want to ask for an explanation, It's not a big company, and it won't go to lawsuits. According to the Chinese people's sophistication,
also blames you for going online. Wasn't it an example of Visual China some time ago, but the practice of Visual China is too offensive.
So the edited movies released from the media now, as long as the copyright owner's permission is not obtained, it must be infringement. If
is used for commercial purposes, it may be held accountable. (It’s not possible at the moment.) For some platforms such as XX headlines, etc., if the copyright owner really wants to be more real, they will only jointly sue this platform, and the
platform will introduce some measures to restrict these free media. That’s why
has said so much. There are very few cases of finding you to settle accounts, but the unlicensed ones are 100% infringement. However,
released the edited movie and helped the copyright owner to distribute it for free. The copyright owner is too late to be happy,
So many things have pros and cons. It depends on how you treat
. Because there are benefits and fans, as long as they can attract fans’ attention, some self-media accounts of
will not pay too much attention to infringement. As long as
can pass through the platform After reviewing and publishing, and getting revenue and fans' attention, who will pay attention to whether
is infringing? Although many platforms encourage original
, original
is not only much more time and effort than moving accounts, but
may be seldom paid attention to even if it is original. In this way, everyone will go. Moved,
became a common phenomenon over time
