recently starring Yi Qianqianxi and Zhou Dongyu, "You're a Younger" , after being removed and deleted, finally re-released. As of last week, this movie has successfully broken one billion box office . This unexpected dark horse not only allows the audience to see the explosive power of the new generation actor Yi Yanqianxi and the Golden Horse Queen Zhou Dongyu, but also exposes everyone to a new theme "campus bullying." If the school bullying in "A River of Sadness" directed by Guo Jingming is to test the waters, then this movie takes this theme to a new level. This excellent film can have sustained popularity and traffic. It should have been a popular thing, but the sudden occurrence of plagiarism from the original book instantly divided the netizens into two opposing factions. Things continued to boil on the Internet, and even the original author came forward to respond to the matter.
Plagiarism and the fusion of stalkers have actually appeared in many film and television works, many of which are worthy of being a dark horse. Even "Nezha: The Child Demon Comes into the World" failed to escape the criticism of netizens. From "The Return of the Great Sage" and "The Big Fish and Begonia", the slogan of the rise of Guoman began to spread slowly. Compared with the latter two, this film, which is more complete in all aspects, is undoubtedly the biggest one in 2019. A dark horse, the box office even defeated the Marvel movie "Avengers 4" that had been out for ten years.
However, there is a lot of popularity, and Huanghu performer Shi Jing even sent Weibo angrily that "Nezha's Devil Child Comes into the World" plagiarized the intangible cultural heritage show "Five-dimensional Memory", and he also posted a comparison chart very intimately. However, in the face of this naked act of touching porcelain, there is no need for the director to end in person, and fans say that they will not buy it. Is this a sensationalism or someone's cheese? The principal can't understand it. Just eat melons silently!
Let’s talk about the 2018 dark horse film "I’m not the god of medicine" , which not only won a box office of 3 billion, but also with this film, acting Tan Zhuo and Zhang Yu entered the public’s field of vision, and Wang Chuanjun also completely rejected it. Taking off his image of Guan Gu in the "Love Apartment" series, Xu Zheng even relied on this movie to win the Golden Horse actor. This film adapted from real events tells the story of ordinary people fighting against disease and fate. It was a very meaningful film, but it was crowned the plagiarism American film "Dallas Buyers Club."
"Dallas Buyers Club" was released in 2013. It is also adapted from a live-action film. The score on Douban is 8.7 and the IMDB score is 8.0. It also swept numerous awards that year. One is a realist commercial film, and the other is a realist art film. It is just that the shooting time is different, and the topic selection is very similar. "I am not the god of medicine" was crowned with the title of plagiarism. "I am not a medicine god" injustice! Director Xu Zheng injustice! It is too wrong! I don't know whether this group of netizens are culturally unconfident, or just want to stab in the bones.
is also the title of "A Good Show" which was released in 2018. also failed to escape the title of plagiarism. This film directed and starred by Huang Bo was very well received as soon as it was released. Even Zhang Yixing contributed to it. The unexpected performance has won 1.1 billion yuan in the box office in 11 days. However, the screenwriter Yu Mengyuan made a voice on Weibo, claiming that "A Good Show" copied the script "Men's Crisis" she had read to Huang Bo. She once invited Huang Bo to play the role of the male character in the play. Huang Bo politely refused. However, Huang Bo used her story frame and character types without authorization to create the movie "A Good Show". After the release of
, this Weibo caused a heated discussion among netizens. When everyone fell to one side and supported Huang Bo, Yu Mengyuan published a long article again, telling the details of the plagiarism. The article is not only justified and logical. It is also very clear.
This made the principal, the people who eat melons, feel a little confused. I can only say, eat melons in silence and wait for the follow-up. Seeing here, what do you think about plagiarism? Come to the comment section and communicate with the principal!
