The real situation in nature must be closer to the rule of Scar, but it’s just a movie, and we can’t make it true. The blackening of Scar and the coyote, Mufasa and Simba’s own light is not just to tell The story, after all, everyone likes the holy light. Mufasa’s rule has compressed the living space of hyenas and expanded the living space of lions. The two are in a trade-off relationship. The overall number of herbivores should be relatively stable. In theory, there is no such thing as the number of hyenas and herbivores will surge. If the hyena population is an indispensable supplement on the grassland, this vacancy may be filled by scavengers such as wild dogs and vultures, so as to reach a new balance within a certain period of time. The
section of the wildebeest is not enough to serve as an argument. When the hyenas and scars trapped Mufasa, they first lured Simba into the Grand Canyon where the wildebeest migrated. This shows that Mufasa knew that wildebeest would pass by in large quantities today, or He and the hyena hunted the wildebeest herd, or he knew it was when the wildebeest was migrating. If it is the first type, the argument that wildebeest migration proves the future of the dry season is not valid. If it is the second type, it means that the scar knows that the dry season is approaching, and it is really a silly skin when it chooses to usurp the throne at this time. It is not in line with his personality
. There must be more than one wet season and dry season during his reign, but nothing happened during Mufasa's period. When the scar is blown up, can it be blamed on Mufasa's head? The environmental decay you said should be gradually manifested. If there is a problem, there will be signs before the scar is high. If it directly leads to an outbreak like this, it is also a pot of scars (for example, when humans discover environmental pollution, they will start. Efforts to control, but if there is no control, it will continue to increase.) Besides, you said that "the large number of herbivores have destroyed the ecology of the grassland." Wouldn't the radical hunting of scars save this land from fire and water? The results of it?
From the point of view of human society, Mufasa’s rule has given the people a low pressure and a rich living environment. Isn’t it still a Mingjun, and then you have to press "It will lead to biological degradation", is it human? Should we abandon the current stable living environment and return to primitive society to wait for the evolution of new humans? I feel that the whole story still has an ancient dynasty's emphasis on orthodoxy and success and failure. The orthodox uppermost is good, and the usurper is not good. But, for the lion in nature, the male lion Whoever wins the upper rank, even his own son won’t let Scar's rank higher. In fact, the upper rank of Scar is orthodox. However, because Simba won in the end, Scar's deeds were blacked out from the inside out. Wang loses.
The rainy season is based on the movement of the direct angle of the sun, and the atmospheric circulation alternates year by year. Simba escapes through the desert to North Africa. From a little lion to a young man, it takes about 5 to 6 years for a male to reach adulthood. In the past 5 to 6 years, it is impossible to not rain at all on the grassland. This is not the root cause of the grassland barrenness. Therefore, I think the inference that the scar has usurped the throne during the dry season and was killed in the rainy season is not valid. The only explanation is: the scar is alive. In places where the sun can’t reach, that is, the wasteland, there is no healthy environment for a long time. The usurpation of the lions and coyotes in the wasteland brought a lot of germs and bacteria, which caused the animals to become sick and die, water pollution, and scars. He didn't think about how to solve the matter, and he was lazy all day long, causing the decline of the Glory Stone.
