I don’t know if you have watched "Actors please take their place". I believe everyone is competing for acting skills, but I don’t know why the entire show is like a talent show. It’s obviously to prove acting skills, but It's as if the acting skills of one of us are worse. However, although the actors' acting skills have been criticized by everyone, the directors are very popular, especially Chen Kaige and Guo Jingming. Needless to say, Chen Kaige, although the "daylight meteor" in the previous "My Motherland and Me" was not very popular with everyone, but I have to bear it. The great director is the great director, and it is an audio-visual feast when speaking. Today we will not talk about Chen Kaige, but will talk about Guo Jingming.
Guo Jingming fully demonstrated what it means to write books, read books, but not direct movies in "Actors please take their place". Fans shouldn't scold me in a hurry. Let me talk about why I think so.
1. Talking about a play is not a pile of rhetoric.
Guo Jingming’s words accounted for most of the time in the actor comment section. At first glance, everyone heard that it made sense, but if you think about what he said, is it impossible to sum up something. This is like writing a essay, most of the rhetoric is piled up, it looks difficult to be gorgeous, but there is no substance. I guess Guo Jingming must have prepared a lot before going on this show and read a lot of professional books.
2. You can talk about love, but don't get big feelings.
Everyone is familiar with Guo Jingming because of his book, which contains a lot of people’s youth, but Guo Jing clearly lacks a lot of things in the director’s film, such as the highly acclaimed "Sadness Goes Against the River", which is the word of mouth. Success is that he is based on school violence. Fans are also working hard to promote that this is the first film about school violence. But think about the original movie, including its entire story frame, is it like everyone said? The movie won on the hot topic of "school violence", but it also lost on Guo Jingming's inseparable love. Li Chengru said that Guo Jingming's photographs of these affections are unnutritive. Thinking carefully about what is wrong, it is just that Guo Jingming's EQ is too high and he is too talkative. It can only be said that some people are only suitable for using pens to describe feelings, not suitable for using lenses to express content.
3. What is a good movie. How does
actually define a movie as a good movie? I can’t say that, but I personally think that the reason why a movie is good is because it makes people feel that there is something in their heart after watching it. If "A River of Sadness" does not use "school violence" as its propaganda point, then it must be the same as the previous "Little Times" filmed by Guo Jingming, and it would lose to those impractical.
Speaking of which, why do I think Guo Jingming is not suitable for director? I can only say that he is too idealistic. A good director can drive the actors and let the actors enter the plot set by themselves, while the director who almost wants to set the plot and let the actors enter by themselves, can only say, Guo Jingming still has a long way to go as a director. When will he abandon those flashy things and be really down to earth? At that time is the beginning of becoming a good director.
