文｜Lu Qi
The DPP lost the election, and Lin Zhijian took the blame
The DPP released a review report on the defeat, summarizing that the reasons for the defeat in the election were that the DPP was involved in black money , there was a problem with public security in Taiwan, and the former Lin Zhijian, mayor of Hsinchu , plagiarized his thesis.
The Democratic Progressive Party pushed Lin Zhijian to run for the mayor of Taoyuan. Halfway through the election, the KMT’s Taipei City Councilor Wang Hongwei revealed that his master’s thesis was suspected of plagiarism, and even the typos were exactly the same. The layout of the DPP ultimately failed to win Taoyuan City.
Lin Zhijian expressed dissatisfaction with this. Lin Zhijian is absolutely responsible for 's failure to win the Taoyuan mayor campaign. He is definitely the most responsible person in the Taoyuan election campaign. What's more, the entire report only criticized Lin Zhijian by name, which somewhat embarrassed Lin Zhijian.
According to Lin Zhijian's complaints, the campaign for the mayor of Taoyuan was not in his plan, and Lin Zhijian was forced to do so. Is Lin Zhijian half-push and half-successful, or being forced to play is not the point, the point is who dominates the entire nomination?
is obviously Tsai Ing-wen. Tsai Ing-wen forcibly canceled the primary election in order to develop her own "British Department" and nominate her confidants to run for the election. According to the poll, 44.5% of the respondents believe that Tsai Ing-wen should be mainly responsible for the results of the "nine-in-one" election, only 12.8% of the respondents believe that the person most responsible is Lin Zhijian, and 7.9% believe that the Taipei City Senate Chen Shizhong was selected, and 5.9% thought it was Su Zhenchang, the head of the "Executive Yuan".
But Tsai Ing-wen, who should be most responsible, was perfectly invisible in the entire defeat review meeting. Lin Zhijian, Su Zhenchang and others were successively pulled out to take the blame for Tsai Ing-wen, but Tsai Ing-wen herself hid behind and did not dare to show her face.
A small review reflects a big problem
Why does this happen?
First of all, although Tsai Ing-wen has resigned as the chairman of the DPP, she still controls the DPP. The current DPP acting chairman is Kaohsiung mayor Chen Qimai, the head of the "Executive Yuan" is Su Zhenchang, the leader of the review team is former Taoyuan Mayor Zheng Wencan, and all three are Tsai Ing-wen's confidantes. The power is still there, and even if other people in the DPP have complaints or resentment, they dare not speak out.
Secondly, the DPP has no intention of reflecting at all. The outside world has been calling for internal reforms in the DPP, but the DPP has one ear and one ear out. After Tsai Ing-wen resigned, the first thing she thought about was not self-criticism and error correction, but how to maximize her own interests and how to compete for the chairmanship of the DPP. Although they all belong to the Democratic Progressive Party, they have already split into many factions. Each faction intrigues each other and wants to put the other party to death. They have no energy or thought to manage the party.
Polls reflect public opinion, public opinion has been clear, asked Tsai Ing-wen to admit her mistakes, asked Su Zhenchang to resign, but the DPP still lives in its own world, the results of the review run counter to public opinion, I don’t know if it is too confident or too arrogant?
According to the "Taiwan Public Opinion Foundation" poll, Taiwanese people's recognition of the DPP has dropped by nearly 11%, which is equivalent to the loss of 2.07 million people who agree with the DPP. At the same time, the satisfaction with Tsai Ing-wen is only The remaining 46.6%, the dissatisfaction is as high as 49.1%; while the satisfaction with Su Zhenchang is 39.5%, and the dissatisfaction is 51.5%. If the Tsai Ing-wen authorities continue to be so stubborn, they will completely lose the support and trust of the Taiwanese people.
Copyright Statement: This article is an original article by the author, and the pictures and materials come from the Internet. Unauthorized reprinting of the text content of this article is strictly prohibited. If you need to reprint or quote, you must obtain the author's consent and indicate the source.