was caught off guard, the well-known Jiaxing Media in the circle was exposed to a debt of 100 million yuan, and the person who broke the news posted multiple contract documents, and repeatedly mentioned the top female in the circle Yang Mi , which immediately set off a whirlpool of public opinion.
After Jiaxing was allegedly owed 100 million yuan, Yang Mi's fans were the first to arrive, and they immediately separated the relationship for her, speaking clearly and well.
Is this really nothing to do with Yang Mi? The contract that
broke the news was signed around November 2017. One month later, Yang Mi did indeed stand for a real estate project under Party B in the contract. It was written on the background board that she was a "special guest for the event".
It seems that Yang Mi has participated in the cooperation between the two parties, but it is not clear how it was agreed.
According to the whistleblower's description, the matter is roughly like this: A real estate company in Guangzhou provided Jiaxing with a loan of 1.625 billion. In exchange, Jiaxing would transfer 25% of shares to the real estate company. The whistleblower said that 90 million had been paid to Jiaxing, but Jiaxing did not transfer 's equity to , so the public debt collection came.
A few hours later, Jiaxing Media finally responded strongly, saying that there was no default in arrears, and the contract between the two parties had been terminated due to the breach of contract by the other party.
What is the truth of the matter?
For Jiaxing Media or Yang Mi, 100 million is really not a big deal. After all, Jiaxing Media is one of the best giants in the industry. Its artists include Yang Mi, Di Lieba , Zhang Yunlong , Gao Weiguang , Wang Xiao, Huang Mengying , Liu Ruilin , etc., with over 30 productions film and television drama.
And Yang Mi is not only a popular female top class, but also has been one of the three major shareholders of Jiaxing for many years, accounting for 15.19% of the shares, and her net worth is conservatively estimated to be more than one billion.
Moreover, judging from the demands of the whistleblower and the contract provided, the dispute between the two parties does not have much to do with Yang Mi. It was cheated by other major shareholders. In the
contract, the payee of the loan is not Yang Mi, but Zeng Jia, Zhao Ruoyao and Li Juan (former shareholders of Jiaxing, who later quit).
Yang Mi did sign the contract, and she is one of the four Party C in the "Share Transfer Agreement". In March 2020, she also signed the cancellation document of the company represented by "Party A 1" in the "Share Transfer Agreement". . Obviously, Yang Mi signed as the major shareholder of Jiaxing.
Moreover, the contract provided by the whistleblower did not specify the responsibilities of the four party C. Whether Yang Mi really has guarantee responsibility is still unknown.
In fact, judging from the performance of both the whistleblower and Jiaxing, Jiaxing should be the reasonable one.
First of all, Party B in the contract is a real estate company, but the person who broke the news did not speak in an official name, but only used an unknown account to collect debts. Obviously, he wanted to exert public pressure on Jiaxing, but this also exposed his guilty side . The two parties already have a contract in black and white. If Jiaxing really breaches the contract, Party B can win through the litigation process to defend its rights and collect debts. Since Jiaxing has not closed down, it is still very easy for Party B to recover the money.
Secondly, the loan agreed in the contract between the two parties is as high as 1.625 billion, but the whistleblower only emphasizes that the first payment of 90 million has been remitted to Jiaxing, and only 18.7 million of the money and interest will be pursued. If Party B really fully fulfills its obligations , and Jiaxing did not transfer the shares to the other party, so the debt recovered should be far more than 100 million, right?
Judging from the current information, it should be that Party B did not pay the loan as agreed, resulting in a breach of contract, and Jiaxing has the right to terminate the contract. If the contract stipulates high compensation, then Jiaxing does not even have to return the 9,000 that it has already received Ten thousand.
According to the contract, if it goes well, the two parties would have completed the transaction as early as the end of 2017. Why did Party B not openly collect debts until today? Moreover, if there is a dispute over the contract, the right and wrong should be judged by the court, and the problem cannot be solved by public opinion.
To sum up, although Jiaxing has a bad reputation in the film and television industry, and although Yang Mi has had many unpopular behaviors, in this round of disputes, Jiaxing and Yang Mi should be the reasonable party.
