, who has studied law for 7 years, passed the final bar exam and the first judicial exam with high marks, and the judge recruitment exam organized by Beijing High Court , but he has never engaged in any legal professional work after graduation. "The Legal Man", I personally think that " Bottom Line " starring Jin Dong is a good drama of realism and popularization of the law.
Aside from the performance of the actors, the main point of this drama is that it conforms to the existing legal norms and legal system in our country, and the details of the case have been carefully designed, which not only has a certain degree of authenticity, but also maintains enough drama Conflict sex. If ordinary people encounter the same legal problems in reality, they can easily draw inferences from one case and accumulate some experience for themselves.
Whether it is a civil or criminal case, under the facts set in the play, I feel that the verdict can stand the test and scrutiny of the real law.
For example, the initial case of intentional injury in the case of humiliating a mother for debt collection, I actually don't know what the situation of a similar case is in reality, but the step-by-step discussion about the truth of the case and the timing of defense in the play, even for the audience who don't know much about the law, after watching it All should be enlightened, and a comprehensive legal concept of self-defense will be formed.
Of course, to say that the show is realistic does not mean that the show is completely real. At least in reality, few judges have the temperament of Jin Dong, let alone the grassroots courts.
Therefore, it is better for the audience to focus on entertainment when watching the drama. If they are active, they can rise to the realm of entertaining and entertaining. If it is too serious, it is necessary to match the plot with the real cases that happened in reality one by one. There is no need. So should the parties.
It is said that the parties to the "Jiangge Case", one of the prototypes of the TV series, were dissatisfied with the plot. Recently, the driver of a Lala case even posted hundreds of words on Weibo, accusing the "magic change" of the plot, which confuses the public, violated his legal rights, and lost his bottom line.
A Weibo of a Lala case party (from the Internet)
The mood of the party is understandable, and no one feels bad if it is on anyone's head. But if you can't get along with the TV series, it's really not.
First of all, who said the cases in The Bottom Line are replicas of real cases? A plot that is exactly the same as a real case may not be good-looking, and it will definitely involve the privacy of both parties. As a legal drama, it's definitely not a pass if you don't take this into consideration when making it.
Second, if the case in the TV series is an adaptation of a real case, it is not correct either. Cases in many fields are very common, and it is a bit rigid to say that it is an adaptation of a specific specific case. Taking a step back, as long as the adaptation is carried out, a small change in detail may cause different judgment results in the legal context, which is in line with reality.
The party involved in a Lala case is dissatisfied, mainly because the plot has changed too much to its real situation. That's right! TV dramas are TV dramas, and they are not meant for you to be seated. And those plot changes enriched the plot and enriched the characters. From the audience's point of view, there is nothing wrong with it. And for viewers like me who didn't know the real case at all, they wouldn't equate the plot with the real case at all. Of course, some viewers with a strong sense of substitution may not think so.
As for the attack on the image of the driver in the play, it is even more outrageous. The TV series is nothing more than a contrast between the characters before and after, misleading the audience's judgment and enhancing the dramatic conflict. Who cares what your driver really looks like? The image of
as a driver is indeed unflattering. The person involved in the Jiang Ge case is more "smart". Although he was dissatisfied with the plot, he chose to distance himself from the beginning: the TV drama and the real situation of the "Jiang Ge case" were inconsistent. Regardless of whether the case is lost or not, people can no longer lose, and they cannot block themselves.
As for this one in the Lala case, it is understandable to have emotions, but you yourself said that the facts have changed, so why should the melon eaters think of you again? Do you really think that with more support from the audience, public opinion can influence the verdict?
In fact, the beginning of "The Bottom Line"The "bottom line" is clearly drawn: take facts as the basis and the law as the criterion. Jin Dong also said many times in the play: If you are dissatisfied with the judgment, you can appeal; if you are dissatisfied with the judge, you can also complain, this is your right (pronounced di, fourth tone).
