Someone broke the news about the luxurious life of Wang Ziwen mansion sachets and various gossip about illegitimate children. In fact, I don't want to talk about Wang Ziwen himself, because from these gossips, many phenomena are very common in the entertainment circle. If you want to know how this phenomenon is caused, you must first ask four questions:
1. How much money can an artist make? What is the composition of income? Many artists of
don't have many works, or to put it another way, there are many works, but there are not many works that can be recognized by the audience. In layman's terms, there are no hits. If
is measured by the value of the work, how does the artist make money when basically all the products are defective?
If an artist only gets a fixed salary, then the standard for determining the salary will generally match their worth. It is said that its worth should be proportional to how much commercial interests its works can achieve. If the work has a bad reputation and does not sell well, where does the high salary come from?
Here, the more important point cannot be ignored. Artists themselves are products, so making money through works is obviously not the only source of income. What kind of product is the
artist himself, it seems more appropriate to compare him to some kind of totem. Totem worship is written in human genes. For the original polytheistic , a stone with a story will become the object of worship, so the artist is turned into an idol and worshipped by fans. The specific operation is not technically difficult. If the
idol is successfully created, then the monetization ability of this idol is distributed, and there may be dozens of endorsements that generate economic benefits at the same time. This is obviously a higher rate of return than an artist making a new product. It can even be understood that the artist is not serving the work, but the work is serving the artist to maintain his popularity. There may be another way for
to monetize, participating in the church meeting of dignitaries or an event, but this is often random and unstable. As for
that cannot be put on the desktop, it is inconvenient to be mentioned as a tool person, a transfer station, etc., all of which are operated in the dark.
Second, is the social status of an artist determined by money or by professional ability or an administrative position?
In the current situation, money must be the first, because money can solve most problems. From which play to get what award, and even the child's education and career choice, money can basically solve it.
My local tyrant friend is relatively short. Someone joked that it is difficult for him to find a partner at this altitude, so the friend went straight back: I can get money for a short stature.
If, I said, if an artist can become the biggest sponsor behind a certain award, or at the extreme, fund an award by himself, then it's not just a question of how likely he is to get this award.
is blessed with awards, that is, professional ability certification. First of all, people outside the circle have to shut up, and people in the circle have to lift him to a higher position, which involves the exchange of interests.
So money can to a certain extent solve what height you are in and what position you get.
3. What is the cultural level of the artist, and does their professional ability meet the basic requirements for their work? If
is viewed as a diploma, it should not be low. If it is very low, you can find a way not to be low.
As for whether the ability can meet the professional requirements required for his work, this is a matter of opinion. After all, intercepting one clip is a drama, and another clip may be the scum of the business.
Judging from the art form of film and television variety shows alone, big-name artists have countless opportunities to NG, coupled with more and more advanced technical means, the professional requirements for such artists are objectively lower and lower.
"Brother Xinchun, get eternal life" used to be a joke about an artist. But now if someone says that their professional ability is not good, there is a high probability that they will be sprayed. The reason for spraying is in addition to praising his professional ability (art appreciation has subjective factors). It will also greatly exaggerate his good character and no scandals. This is not next to each other, as you said that the electrician's cleaning is cleaner than the cleaning aunt.
4. Do artists have a fixed circle, or group together to keep warm or reject dissidents?
This is a must have. In those days, Duan jokingly said, "After passing through Shanhaiguan, I will find Benshan when I have something to do."
The market resources of any industry are limited, and it is the basic principle of practitioners to compete for these limited resources to obtain greater benefitsappeal. Fishing has to be in a good spot, isn't it?
Therefore, it is necessary to keep warm in a group. The Beijing circle, Shanghai circle, Hong Kong circle, northwest circle, northeast circle... all have their own spheres of influence. When an artist shoots a film or a show, those people in the circle are often together. It is rarely out of the circle, and it is difficult for outsiders to get in. The result of
is that there is basically no communication between the circles, and they are self-sufficient and even stumbling each other. Many black materials of artists are purposely exposed because of the competition for interests. Otherwise, the circle is closed like an iron bucket, and the needles cannot penetrate, and the water will not penetrate. If you can't pour it in, it's impossible for outsiders to get the inside story.
These four questions can basically answer the current state of the entertainment industry. The next step is to see if it is possible to solve these four questions. If it can't be solved, bad movies will always exist, and an artist's accident is just a question of when it will be exposed. If there is no normal and orderly environment for
literature and art, it will still be a group of demons dancing wildly. The needs of the public and the works created by the circle will always be separated and passively accepted, and it is not only the public aesthetics that has changed.
