The mountains and rain are about to come, and Xinjiang cotton has been pushed to the forefront of the storm and has become a hot spot in the world. The cause of the incident was a series of effective farce triggered by the H&M brand banning Xinjiang cotton.
looks messy on the surface, involving many international brands, including H&M, Nike, Adidas, Crocodile, Zara, Ralph Lauren, and so on. We are familiar with brands. The various statements on the product side of
are just appearances. The dominant player hiding behind is the so-called "Better Cotton Development Association", or BCI in English. What is this BCI
? Superficially speaking, it can be regarded as an ordinary international organization that can no longer be ordinary. The so-called BCI of
was nothing before the US and Sweden injected capital! It's just that after the United States and Sweden injected capital, with the money, they behaved a bit arrogantly!
Seeing this, do you think something is wrong? It's right to feel wrong!
What does this mean, means that there is someone else behind the owner who is really doing things, and BCI is just a puppet. Who is
? it goes without saying! The
incident has a very strange development context!
First of all, some Western countries have consistently attacked and discredited China on the so-called "Human Rights in Xinjiang" issue; they even made a lot of appearances and blamed China as evidence. After spreading rumors and hyping "Uyghur birth control",
shifted the focus of the attack to cotton production in Xinjiang, spreading rumors that China's forced labor, forcibly put a high hat of concentration camp-style forced labor on China. The introduction of the
incident was created, and it was logical to follow. Xinjiang cotton companies somehow received the so-called notice of termination of cooperation from BCI. Subsequent announcements by international brands such as H&M that ban Xinjiang cotton also came out naturally. .
Everything is as logical as a textbook, without professional design and premeditated, who would believe it?
From human rights issues to forced labor, to the ban on Xinjiang cotton, the prestigious name is to protect the so-called "human rights." However, many brands prohibit the hiring of Uyghur employees. Are they contradictory?
Human rights to the prohibition of Xinjiang cotton, and then back to human rights, this is a set of premeditated combination boxing. After the momentum building is over, we will attack related companies in China, and then build momentum in an attempt to vilify and discredit China.
's intentions are not sinister, things are far from over, heavier weights are still behind. What is the plot of
? Let's briefly summarize:
is the first one. After economic actions, economic interests will inevitably be involved, and the end of this interest is China's textile industry.
Xinjiang cotton is not the goal, the Chinese textile industry is the real goal. Let's use data to speak. According to relevant statistics, Xinjiang's cotton production will account for 87.3% of the country's total in 2020. This can be seen from this. In other words, Xinjiang is the largest and most important producer of high-quality cotton in China. Relying on high-quality cotton producing areas, China has shaped the foundation of China's textile industry with its unique output advantages.
Let's look at the export situation of China's textile industry. In 2019, China's textile exports accounted for 39.2% of the world's total, which is a lot of one-third of the proportion. The economic benefits brought by this are also obvious. There is such a paragraph that the boss of the waistcoat production in Yiwu, Zhejiang, China accurately predicted the yellow waistcoat incident in France, which is enough to explain the status of the Chinese textile industry in the world.
Now, some western countries are doing everything possible to start with Xinjiang cotton. Some international brands are following closely, not just Xinjiang cotton, but behind it is the Chinese textile industry.
Second, behind the clear political conspiracy is a public opinion war that discredited and vilified China's image.
Human rights are one of the most common means used by Western countries to interfere in the internal affairs of other countries, and they can often achieve very good results. Therefore, Western countriesHave fun with this. In recent years, the West has spared no effort to create troubles and take the opportunity to discredit China unscrupulously. It is by no means as superficial as it appears on the surface. The core focus of
is on the image of China. The image of China directly affects the relationship between China and some countries, which is a typical disparity. Some Western countries intend to create human rights issues, and immediately create momentum, hoping to use their advantages in the field of international public opinion to make guilty inferences about China, and ultimately make more countries in the world believe and accept their pre-planned results.
is mainly a public opinion war against Islamic countries and third world countries. After “convicting” China, and allowing the intended countries to accept this result, the relationship between China and Islamic countries and the third world countries will be separated, thereby isolating China internationally; more importantly, it will be possible to transfer Islamic countries’ opposition The hostility of Western capitalism is obviously to achieve the effect of killing two birds with one stone.
The third one is pseudo-human rights and actual suppression. The ultimate goal is to take a fancy to Xinjiang, a strategic location.
If we only regard this time as a game between economics and international public opinion, it would be a bit superficial; what I want to emphasize here is that this is not a conspiracy theory, but a real point of view: the West is anti-China What the forces fancy is Xinjiang, a strategic land channel along the chain of China's Belt and Road Initiative.
Once a senior U.S. official publicly stated that he would mobilize the 20 million Uighurs in Xinjiang, China, and mess up China. There are many similar remarks, but they are definitely not groundless. As early as the founding of the People’s Republic of China, the US Central Intelligence Agency secretly launched a ten-point subversion of China. The Color Revolution’s attacks on China have never stopped. Some things have happened in Xinjiang in the past. The presence of foreign forces secretly supporting and planning in China is enough to explain the problem.
This is one of them, and the other is Xinjiang is the western strategic channel of China's Belt and Road Initiative. This channel can be called another lifeline of China. When we made the sea channel a lifeline, the country adopted the Belt and Road Initiative and adopted the trend of advancing both sea and land, and the land lifeline was used as a backup strategic lifeline for reserve. For example, at sea, China has to reach South Asia, West Asia, Africa and even Europe. After all, a route has to pass through several straits at the junction of the two oceans of the Indo-Pacific. These straits have been under the control of the US military for a long time. It threatens the security of China's maritime strategic channels; in addition to vigorously developing the navy's ocean-going combat capabilities, we also need to choose an alternate route. This route is from China's Xinjiang through Pakistan to the Indian Ocean. China can directly cross the long sea route and directly transport the required resources back to the country. Of course, the Xinjiang-Pakistan-Indian Ocean route is only one part of the layout of the Belt and Road Initiative, and there are many more, so I won’t repeat them here.
Compared with sea routes, the land routes are less likely to be controlled by Western countries. At this time, Xinjiang’s strategic position is reflected. After the ability of Western anti-China forces to encircle and contain China is greatly reduced, it must be In this direction, you will lose money and punch hard.
They have only one purpose. They are guided by "human rights" to create various incidents, and ultimately achieve the purpose of messing up China. Everyone knows their sinister intentions.
Based on the above, the wishful thinking of the anti-China forces in the West has not been a day or two. They intend to achieve the effect of three birds with one stone through a Xinjiang cotton. One stone is the so-called "human rights" and Xinjiang cotton, and the three birds are to suppress China's textile industry. , Divide the relationship between China and Islamic countries and third world countries, smear China's image and mess up China's Xinjiang.
However, it is foreseeable that this is just a waste of water! The history of
is always surprisingly similar, but there are always some not long memories, and they undoubtedly chose a difficult road.
They have neglected a law: Any economic benefit and political conspiracy are bound to be a difficult thorny road. Multinational companies with economic benefits as the core will certainly pay a painful economic price for this. Japan is a lesson for the past.
not only wants to discredit China, but also wants to make a lot of money in China, the worldCan there be such a good thing in time?
In the face of economic benefits, we can wait and see how long you can last!