Some people say that Zhang Ziyi's performance is a hallow performance. I do not believe.
Not to mention Zhang Ziyi, even those seniors and veterans, dare not say that anyone's performance is a hallowed performance.
Speaking of which actor can be called a hall-level acting skill, someone must have gone to the trouble to list the names of those old actors, such as Chen Daoming, Li Xuejian, Chen Baoguo, Li Youbin, as well as Gongli and Siqin Gaowa. I admit that these old actors all have deep acting skills, otherwise it would be impossible to have participated in so many classic film and television dramas and left so many classic roles. But if anyone's acting skills can be called palace-level, his performance is impeccable, and any other interpretation is wrong, then there is a question mark.
Speaking of acting, this kind of thing is really mysterious, it should be real, but many times we think we can see it clearly, but in fact we are always in the mist.
often see people say this, a certain classic movie chooses a certain actor is really the right choice, watch it after many years, that person is the best choice to play a certain role in the movie, who is it?
However, is this true? You must know that many movies have experienced casting controversy. The good actor originally said that he did not appear in the film due to various reasons. Then he changed to another actor and became a big success. Is this alternate actor the best choice? If there was no change of roles at the beginning, would any actor be worse than him in the first place?
In addition, the irreplaceable words of a certain actor in the movie cannot stand scrutiny. A movie came out, and an actor played very well, but this does not mean that other actors are not qualified for that role, but because the movie came out, it is almost impossible for another actor to replace that person again. Because it cannot be reproduced and cannot be compared, the performance of the actors in the film has become an irreplaceable past.
Faced with some situations in life, each of us reacts differently. This is related to personality, experience, and life experience. When facing some similar scenes on the stage, why do actors need to behave exactly the same? Are they all acted as in textbooks or other movies and TV shows?
is that real stage is not equal to real life, but the latter is always the basis of the former, right? Excluding the tension on the stage, as long as the actors react normally, or have their own reasonable understanding of the plot and roles, there will not be so many "wrong acting", right?
I believe that there are superior and inferior acting skills, but it is so high that I don’t know what kind of state it is. Others still said that it was a "textbook-like" performance at every turn. Is this for everyone to perform in a uniform manner? In the
variety show "I am an actor", the instructors including Zhang Ziyi will be invited to perform "in person" on the stage after making some comments. The audience always applauds their performances. However, are they absolutely correct? Interpreting such a paragraph, is there only such a suitable method in the world? I do not believe.
Of course, I am not saying that the performances of the instructors are mediocre, but that they are a little overconfident. You know, the audience and other mentors seem to approve of his performance more on the one hand because he may really perform well, and on the other hand, it may also be because he has greater visibility and so-called "authority". Everyone accepts him more psychologically, and they are willing to believe that the tutor's demonstration performance is impossible not to be outstanding, and it is impossible not to surpass the talented actors.
This is like a beauty pageant. The person selected in the end is often not the beauty that every judge believes in his heart, but the girl they think others will choose like this.
For a concept that we don’t understand, there is no need to always give it toGood actors pay gold. Good actors are good actors, but there are no myths about them, and they are not so good enough to be impeccable.
