Yesterday, CCTV's China Film Report was in hot search. The specific reason for
is that the director Hu Jianli commented on the film "Zhu Xian". He said: "As for the actors' acting skills, Xiao Zhan, Li Qin, and Tang Yixin are quite satisfactory, and Meng Meiqi's performance is not very good, making him more acting."
There are endless arguments. Some people say that the director’s words are truthful, and some people say that the director is just trying to keep up the enthusiasm, and has no understanding of the film and the actors themselves.
So, is the choreographer's evaluation correct? How about the performance of the actors in "Zhu Xian"? Next, let us put aside the prejudice and fair and objective evaluation.
Actually, I quite approve of the choreographer's evaluation of the actors' acting skills in "Zhu Xian".
As far as the performance of all the actors in "Zhu Xian" is concerned, except for the acting skills of Rhubarb and Monkey, the others can only say that they are quite satisfactory and even play.
Of course, this problem is not blamed on the actors to a certain extent. After all, when the overall structure and logic of the film have problems, it is unrealistic for you to try these actors to jump out of the frame and make amazing scenes.
After all, the script has so many flaws and the character setting is so broken, and the space for playing is basically locked.
is specific to each actor. First of all, Xiao Zhan is not as amazing as the fans. In particular, some fans also took screenshots of Xiao Zhan’s expressions in the film and used it to prove his acting skills, which is really funny in my opinion.
After all, the actors play the whole character, and the whole character should be three-dimensional and linear. The performance measurement standard must not only have a certain demeanor and fine action, but also interpret the psychological changes of the characters. , And these should be evaluated based on linear performance.
At this time, fans can see the amazing feeling from Xiao Zhan's pouting before he blackened and his gloomy face after he blackened. I was also drunk.
Of course, although Xiao Zhan is not amazing, but it is not too bad.
After all, Zhang Xiaofan in the film setting is thin, unlike the novel with so many details to support it, and let Xiao Zhan play an inherently thin and rigid role, I can only say that he played well, and it is indeed quite rigid. of.
As for Li Qin and Tang Yixin, they face the same problem.
When the film character itself has no aura, the transformation has no psychological support at all, and it is only for the plot. Actors' performances naturally have little room for discussion, especially for Li Qin and Tang Yixin, the two actors are not like Aunt Mei, they have their own views on the role, and can integrate personal understanding into the role to give the role aura.
So the two just follow the director's arrangement to shoot stereotyped roles and have their own thinking about the role, which is doomed to their mediocrity in performance.
Of course, during this process, I also heard the voice of Li Qin.
For example, Li Qin has the best performance and interpretation of Lu Xueqi among the many actors and actresses.
In fact, this conclusion is not valid. The reason why Lu Xueqi played by Li Qin gives people a good feeling is mainly because of the advantage of appearance and the fit between herself and the role.
is actually embodied in performance, and Li Qin is as mediocre as Xiao Zhan and Tang Yixin.
As for Meng Meiqi's widespread criticism, there are two other reasons.
first is of course that she has poor skills. After all, she is not from a major and has no experience in filming. No matter how hard you make her struggle, she won't be able to play.
The second is that she played a little clever when she was not good at acting.
is to play Baguio directly as a maid, and try to interpret Baguio's aura with liveliness, cuteness and jumping.
But it turns out that Meng Meiqi used the wrong clever.
also said earlier that although the overall structure of the film is not good, other actors at least interpret the character of the character, although these characters are still rigid and thin in the film.
But for Baguio, Meng Meiqi has no understanding of the role setting. This is Meng Meiqi's biggest problem.
When she doesn't understand the role, her performance is noisy, clumsy, and jokes.
is funny at this time, when fans of the original book criticized Meng Meiqi for not understanding the role enough and performing poorlyTime. Fans of Meng Meiqi went the other way and supported her with enough humor, passion, and laughter.
didn't know that this was the biggest irony to her, because it also proved that she did not understand the character setting from beginning to end.
So overall, I agree with a certain CCTV film critic's evaluation of their performance, except that he said "Zhu Xian" is China's Harry Potter.
is really funny because of this metaphor.
