News from Xiaokang.com. It has been more than half a month since Xiao Zhan fans reported the AO3 storm, and the Internet is still controversial. On March 11, the Supreme People’s Procuratorate’s official micro-"Procurator Daily" published five consecutive commentary articles on the "Xiao Zhan 227 Incident" on the fifth and sixth editions of the Rule of Law Review, expressing the various voices of netizens. The related legal issues were discussed.
At 13:00 on February 24, the Weibo user "Didi's Escape" published the serialization of the latest chapter of his fan article "The Fall" on Weibo. In the article, Xiao Zhan's setting is a hair salon girl with gender cognitive impairment, while Wang Yibo is a minor high school student who fell in love with him. This setting aroused strong dissatisfaction from Xiao Zhanwei's fans.
At 18:05 pm on February 26th, Xiao Zhanwei's fans @来碗甜酱? and @巴南区小兔赞比 first attacked the doujinshi "Downfall" and its author.
@巴南区小兔赞比 Constantly clarified its position, emphasizing that the reporting of the article "The Fall" is not just for the benefit of Xiao Zhan's fan group, but for the victims of artists who have been written into the humanities.
She said that Xiao Zhan fans do not intend to trouble the AO3 website, they only care about maintaining the reputation of the star.
Next, the situation gradually expanded. Many fans of Xiao Zhan joined the condemnation of the author of "The Fall" and the author of the same humanities. Subsequently, the author of "The Fall", "Didi's Escape", blocked the serial series of "The Fall" by Lofter, and the author himself changed his name to avoid the limelight.
On the evening of February 27th, Xiao Zhan fans continued to report their real names with initial results. A large number of articles on the Lofter platform were locked. Many creators were also incognito due to concerns and temporarily "ran away." AO3 Baidu Post Bar, AO3 official website, same-sex content at station B, and content written by Lofter were blocked.
At 10:20 in the morning on February 29, AO3’s official Weibo issued a statement, giving an official explanation for the “warning label”:
Regarding the question of “whether the creation of the same humanity infringes the rights of real people”, the answer given by AO3 is: Do not behave like a fan It constitutes a personal attack, but "substantial harm is prohibited."
At this time, the fan creation culture formed over the past decades has a special self-protection mechanism, and then press the "Report" button. Creators from Europe, America, Japan and South Korea, animation, fan art, Danmei and other circles have risen to oppose Xiao Zhan fans’ reporting creation platform. Fandom passers-by began to transfer their dissatisfaction with Xiao Zhan’s fans to Xiao Zhan himself, that is, “fan behavior, idol pays.”
Starting in the early morning of March 1, passers-by launched an offensive against Xiao Zhan’s commercial endorsements, and Xiao Zhan’s reputation in all aspects was almost shaky. . "He endorsed, I won't buy it. Fans act as idols to pay."
At the same time, olAY's Taobao live broadcast room has "boycott Xiao Zhan" comments appearing every second, and the fire of starting a prairie fire has ignited all over the Internet.
The endorsement of Xiao Zhan, including Mengniu True Fruit Granules, is also in jeopardy. There is no search for "Xiao Zhan" related products in Mengniu Jingdong self-operated stores.
The re-comments on Estee Lauder's official Weibo have fallen, mostly for "boycotting the spokesperson Xiao Zhan".
At around 5 am on March 1, Xiao Zhan fans realized the seriousness of the situation and began to cut the group. The leader of the incident @巴南区小兔赞比 expelled the fan circle in order to preserve the fan circle and Xiao Zhan himself.
apology press release:
On March 1, Xiao Zhan studio posted an apology on Weibo: Recently we noticed some controversies about Xiao Zhan fans, occupying some social public resources, and causing some trouble to us. I deeply regret and apologize for the impact of the incident.
However, the whole storm did not end. This massive battle of public opinion is seemingly not knowing how to reach the end, but it unexpectedly ushered in official authoritative opinions. On March 11, the Supreme People's Procuratorate's official micro-"Procurator Daily" published five consecutive commentary articles on the "Xiao Zhan 227 Incident" in the fifth and sixth editions of the Rule of Law Review. The first article of
: How to comment on the merits of the Xiao Zhan incident
The article pointed out the original intention of the founder of AO3 and the controversy in it, and gave both sides views on the existence of child pornography.
Chapter 2: Don’t let the fan’s preferences ruin fan culture
The article believes that fan creation is an important hotbed of literary creation. The same humanities website has self-discipline, classification, and elimination, although it may not make youWhere it is satisfied, it still has enough value.
Chapter 3: Xiao Zhan Incident: A War without Victors
The author believes that Xiao Zhan himself and his team need to bear greater responsibility in this incident.
Chapter 4: Judging the Two Dimensions of Xiao Zhan Incident
The two dimensions described by the author are: 1. The legal risks of fan works, including possible infringement of copyright and related rights and interests, possible infringement of reputation rights, and possible suspected crimes. 2. Whether the fan’s behavior is legal and reasonable: the main body to maintain the celebrity’s reputation should be the person himself, not the fan; the dispute settlement place should be in the court, not the Internet.
Article 5: Prosecutorial Daily: Legal Issues Involved in "Fan Novels"
The author discussed whether Xiao Zhan Wang Yibo’s fan novel "The Fall" infringes name rights, reputation rights, portrait rights, and commercialization rights, which constitutes several unfair competitions problem. The conclusion is that the author of "Downfall" should not be an infringement of reputation.
So far, this heated controversy finally has an official character. However, the discussion on the "fan circle culture" triggered by this is still worthy of continued attention. (The pictures in the article are all from the Internet, if there is any infringement, please inform and delete)
Source: China Xiaokang Network
