has watched a lot of youth movies, including the excellent "To Youth" and countless bad movies that followed the trend. The movie "About Winter" became a silly and sweet bad movie by the CCTV channel for a reason. The content is old-fashioned and naive. , The mentally handicapped view of love violates normal thinking.
This is a movie in which memories of feelings are greater than women chasing love. The expectation is that it hurts a woman who loves you, rather than falling in love with a man who hurts you. Ma Sichun and Huo Jianhua’s acting skills are good, the fault is that the unrealistic adaptation of the screenwriter makes the whole plot look illogical and very ungrounded. The headless love is too far away from reality. The movie is not a novel, it can be imagined, and the movie needs resonance. .
Rene Liu's "Later Us" was a big win. Why did the movie "About Winter" be abandoned by the audience? CCTV's "Today Film Critic" gave the answer to the real failure. Ma Sichun asked: When will you come back? Huo Jianhua said: Around winter. (Please, can you speak human words? This is not a novel, but a movie. Can the lines be like Qiong Yao?) For example, He Shuhuan said to Lu Yiping: You are cold, you are unfeeling, and you are too cruel. Lu Yiping asked He Shuhuan: You said that I was cruel, that I was unfeeling, and that I was cruel, what about you? The reason why the movie
has no resonance after watching it is because the hero and the heroine are entangled for entanglement, without normal people's thinking and judgment, the chaotic development sequence and misplaced views of love are too disturbing. The film written by Rao Xueman made three fatal mistakes, that is, mistakenly treating novels as movies, mistakenly treating love as food, and mistakenly treating broken love as struggle. The box office of only 100 million in six days is evidence.
first, mistakenly treat novels as movies. The right to adapt the novels such as "Left Ear" and "The Secret Fruit" is the author's personal responsibility. It is easy to make a logical mistake of extending the perspective of the movie to the picture of the novel. This is the biggest mistake. Novels and movies are completely different. The novel itself relies on the fantasy and association of the readers, while the movies are directly given to the audience. Readers of the novel are not satisfied, and movie audiences are not satisfied.
Second, I mistake love for food. At the premiere, Liu Haoran asked Ma Sichun, what strong belief do you have in the movie to love a scumbag so much? The heroes and heroines are particularly naive to love. Ma Sichun's An Ran has grown from an ordinary reporter to an excellent hostess. Why did he suddenly lose control after seeing Huo Jianhua a few years later? Insufficient foreshadowing, the reason is unknown, it is difficult to accept.
Enron is like an obsession to retain Huo Jianhua. I can do nothing for you. Isn't this typical silly white sweet? And the prodigal son of Taipei Qi Xiaoer turned his head, and he was able to make Ma Sichun abandon everything for him without any move to impress his heart. How sturdy energy is this? What age is it, how is it possible? Which successful woman would give up her comfort zone for an unseen man?
If you want to express vigorous love, you need a prerequisite, that is, the family difference between the hero and the hero, and the desire for love. When they meet, they must have a strong opposition force. Then the confession of love is earth-shattering, and the proof of love is thorny. The promise of love was worried, and the kiss of love reached a climax in the end. This movie did nothing, so the Douban score plummeted to a failure.
is third, mistakenly regard broken love as struggle. This is not a film about the growth of women, it is just a cover, without seeing the breakthrough and growth of women. An Ran wanted to be a host, but gave up everything for love. This is nonsense. It is absolutely impossible in reality. The reason why it seems to be so bloody has nothing to do with the actors, the acting skills, the director, the screenwriter, and the plot. Unfortunately, in the end the actor took the responsibility for the negative reputation of this film. This is very wrong, Ma Sichun is too wronged.
At the time, Dongyu Zhou and Ma Sichun, who won the Golden Horse Movie with "July and Ansheng", started from the same starting point, but because of the difference in the choice of script and aesthetics, the word of mouth for the next movie was worlds apart, so Ma Sichun was honest You should learn from Zhou Dongyu.
is okay, if you fail, you can get up and watch the performance of the next movie.
