Yang Mi's entire paper based on his work "Harbin 1944" has been officially released!
This paper was selected into the C expansion section of the "Chinese Journal of Radio and Television". Yang Mi overtook the curve and became one of the few stars in the entertainment industry who personally published papers. But at the same time, this also attracted There were multiple doubts and many hot searches until the full text was released. Netizens read it word by word with a magnifying glass, but found many problems.
This paper is short and concise. The word count of more than 3,000 words is not small in itself. As a paper that can be published on a website that countless master's and doctoral students dream of, it does not seem to meet the official standards. In this paper, Yang Mi takes her own role as an example, combines reality and theory, and describes her own ideas on how to construct the role framework and the inner feelings and creative habits of interpreting the role. The framework of the entire paper is very clear, and it is quite satisfactory at a glance. But some low-level errors were discovered.
First of all, netizens questioned the "shallow talk" in the title "A Brief Discussion on the Creative Habits of Actors in Film and Television Dramas", which is a taboo. It can be included in such a valuable official platform, but "blatantly" uses such a shallow wording in the title. , In addition, including directly referring to myself as "the author" in the text will undoubtedly reduce the value of this article.
Furthermore, in the eyes of netizens, Yang Mi’s words and sentences in this paper are not convincing. Although she tried hard to make the words very official, the words between the lines still make people feel very superficial and full of words, but once they are Compared with the effectiveness of this work in reality, netizens feel that Yang Mi is just talking on paper.
Then again, different people’s perception of text is very subjective, but I believe that the data will not deceive people. Some netizens found through official tool surveys that the duplication check rate of Yang Mi’s paper was only 0.9%, and the AI rate was only 0.9%. It soared directly to 36%. If it is a very qualified paper, the plagiarism check rate should neither be too high nor too low. If it is too high, it means plagiarism. If it is too low, it proves that it has no gold content at all. The paper was originally written by the author on the basis of the original references. Learn from and innovate. If the duplication check rate is too low, how can we prove that Yang Mi really summarized and refined it by reading various materials on his own?
Coincidentally, the AI rate of this paper is so high. It is no wonder that netizens will guess that Yang Mi just pieced together different points, causing people to feel illogical from the beginning of the introduction, from explaining the actor's creative habits to The key is to jump to how to construct the character image, and then return to the creative habits.
As everyone said, after the full text of Yang Mi’s paper was made public, it aroused overwhelming doubts. Most netizens generally believed that this paper would be acceptable if it was just to deal with the teacher, but from the perspective of speaking skills, text logic, etc., it is fundamentally It does not meet the publication standards of "Chinese Journal of Radio and Television".
However, fans are still using "the journals in which Yang Mi publishes papers do not charge page fees" to prove that Yang Mi did not use the back door and relied on her own strength to become a hot search. Fans are crazy about trying to respect her, but they are severely questioned by netizens. It's a slap in the face, but no matter what, there are specialties in the art industry, and actors should still do their job well and conquer the public with their acting skills. This is the truth.
Unauthorized reproduction of this article is strictly prohibited. Violators will be prosecuted!
