The first thing I did when I woke up recently was to see where the British royal family's version of "The Vanishing She" has progressed.
At the moment I am typing, it is already the second month since Princess Kate has disappeared.
Although according to "The Sun", Princess Kate appeared at the Windsor Farm today, she still couldn't provide a certificate for half of the photos.
The speculations (that is, various conspiracy theories) pushed by big data have become more and more terrifying, from Princess Kate suspected of suffering from a rare disease to being stabbed by a mistress, and even upgraded to William Toko (there are rumors that William's children were also involved in protective measures). Mom is Killed), to the point where The Crown could do three episodes in a row.
However, the members of the British royal family at the center of the storm tend to remain calm.
always has an official face when it comes to questioning the media and the public, and (very rarely) implements the family motto of "never complain, never explain".
Suspicion naturally intensified.
however.
I donāt really believe in the mistress stabbing theory.
The reason is, I wonāt go into details here, but letās give some background introduction to friends who havenāt paid attention to this matter.
Time goes back to the beginning of this year.
On January 18, the British royal family released an official document stating that Princess Kate had undergone an abdominal surgery the day before and was now in the hospital.
Several key pieces of information:
1. An abdominal surgery was performed the day before. The operation went smoothly and she is expected to stay in the hospital for observation for 10-14 days;
2. According to the princess's wishes, specific medical information will be kept confidential;
3. According to the doctor's orders, the princess will They will rest until Easter and will not carry out any public affairs work before; each of these
items gradually gets out of control and arouses suspicion in the subsequent development of events.
First is the discharge time.
According to official news, Princess Kate was discharged from the hospital and returned home on January 29 and is recovering well.
However, despite the intense scrutiny from the British media and some members of the public, no one took a photo of Kate being discharged from the hospital.
At the same time, King Charles, Kate's father-in-law, who was officially admitted to the hospital for treatment of "enlarged prostate", was also discharged from the hospital at the same time and appeared with his wife Camilla.
From this, the seeds of the large-scale suspense drama "Where's Kate?" were planted.
Soon, the British royal family released another big news: Charles was diagnosed with cancer.
It is said that the cancer was discovered during previous prostate treatment, but the specific type of cancer was not disclosed by the royal family.
But the paradox is that despite the news of cancer, Charles continued to complete his daily work as usual, and did not appear to be too different in front of the camera.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that Charles faked having cancer.
There are many types of cancers and they are divided into stages. Regular treatment for many early-stage cancers does not affect daily life, which is no problem. The paradox of
lies in the superposition of two facts.
Whatās incredible is that if you want to choose the place in the world that is most enthusiastic about insisting on ācanāt say noā, the British royal family will do its part.
From Queen Elizabethās father, George VI, to Queen Elizabeth herself, their major medical histories were only revealed by the media after their deaths.
The beginning of "The Crown" shows how George VI secretly battled lung cancer while handling state affairs with a straight face.
In the perception of the royal family members, they are not supporting themselves, but the dignity of the entire country.
One of the reasons why Princess Diana was so popular back then was that she was the first member of the royal family to cry openly in front of the camera. This display of human touch instantly won her a lot of favor.
But she also failed to completely reverse the nobility of the royal family.
His sons, William and Harry, could not shed tears even when attending their mother's funeral.
You can understand it as a kind of aristocratic spirit of "standing and dying", or you can understand it as an anti-humanistic patriarchal narcissism, but one thing cannot be denied:
As long as it can be tough for a day, the British royal family will not be able to show any of their own. weak.
Understanding this premise, it is not difficult to understand why the British people suspect that the news that Charles has cancer is to divert attention from Princess Kate's situation.
This is indeed not the consistent style of the British royal family.
And when the news was released, it was indeed at a time when the public had different opinions on "what disease did the princess have?"
And this is the second point of doubt:
According to the official statement, the specific condition of the illness is not announced because Kate wants to maintain privacy.
is a grand reason, but it is really difficult to convince the public.
After all, since Princess Diana, who can still believe that the British royal family can be a place where "personal feelings" are respected?
Itās not just Princess Diana. As mentioned above, the spirit of the British royal family is to serve as a symbol of the country and royal power, not as an individual.
In "The Crown", on the day Elizabeth changed from a princess to a queen, her grandmother called her and said:
"Queen Elizabeth and Elizabeth Mountbatten will fight for a lifetime, but the royal power must always win."
The successor to the royal power has been growing up since childhood. Be taught: "Nod less, smile less, talk less, breathe less."
In short, be less a living person and more a symbol.
Royal honor and royal face are always more important than your personal will.
It is also this principle that runs counter to the modern concept of freedom and equality that has spawned so many royal scandals. It is said that "where there is oppression, there is resistance."
Of course, this is a story for later.
Back to Kate, if public opinion has not escalated to the point of hurting the dignity of the royal family, people will still believe her "respect for privacy".
Now they have begun to suspect that their mistress is coming to kill people, but they are still unwilling to disclose the specific symptoms and maintain Kate's personal privacy in a way that consumes the credibility of the royal family?
Buckingham Palace probably cannot do such a humane thing.
The only possibility is that the specific medical condition he concealed will have a negative impact on the royal family that is even worse than the current suspicion.
It is also on this basis that the "wife-killing theory" is comparable to the "wife-killing theory" in palace dramas, and the "son-killing theory" began to spread vigorously. I wonāt give you specific examples of
and the so-called ācredentialsā. There are too many scraps, but too few serious ones.
Why donāt I believe that this is the case? Itās not that I believe in the character of the royal family, I just think itās unreasonable.
Stabbing someone in power can be played in a TV series, but as mentioned above, in a place like the British royal family, which is the most repressive place on human nature, if you want to "kill someone" with such a strong personal will that even the criminal law can't stop it. The way is superior, is it a bit wrong to roll on the track?
The royal conspiracy in "The Two Legends"
The logic of the British royal family's selection of concubines, it is not difficult to guess if you look at Diana and Kate who are recognized, and Camilla and Meghan who are denied.
People want Shen Meizhuang, not Qi Guiren.
There is also a theory that William worked with his mistress, which is even more ridiculous.
Camilla (she is considered to be the third partner of Charles and Diana) has already been called the back. This royal family wants the mistress to take over, so there really is no need to go to war so much.
As for William's mistress Rose, for now, they are still the kind of rumors that "can't even show a picture".
Although it is an open royal secret that "every Prince of Wales has a mistress", this cannot be used as evidence.
What is the truth?
I'm sorry, I really can't guess.
Of course, Crohn's disease was the first to be reported, and I still think it is a possibility.
Because of Crohn's disease, if it is severe, it is necessary to wear an ostomy bag (commonly known as a fecal bag).
For an ancient family that still has cumbersome and even pedantic etiquette, this is indeed a physical condition that they try their best to hide.
Crohn's disease, a disease that causes people to lose weight rapidly, can even explain the biggest mystery in the follow-up of this mystery:
The Mother's Day photo paging incident on March 10th.
Once this photo, allegedly taken by William himself, was released, Leeuwenhoeks discovered many traces of p-pictures.
Princess Kate also clarified on her own account, saying that she, like everyone else, would post photos after taking photos.
But netizens obviously don't buy it. The simple logic is:
If your condition is really as shown in the picture, then why can't you just take two steps without any illness?
It just so happens that the extremely thin state can explain the two things of p-picture and inability to show to the public at the same time.
Well, there's a bit of Sherlock Holmes going on.
Just a guess, just for fun.
The purpose of this article is actually not to solve the case, but more to express my feelings about the sentiment behind the now-popular mistress stabbing theory:
Twenty-seven years have passed, and people in the UK and even the world have probably still not been able to get over it. ptsd of anna's death.
Although Diana and Kate are both called "civilian princesses", they are compared to the royal family.
Unlike Kate who needed a loan to attend an aristocratic school, Diana actually came from a real aristocratic background.
Her father is the eighth Earl Spencer, who belongs to an old aristocratic family in Norfolk, England.
The little girl at position c is 9-year-old Diana
However, Dianaās family atmosphere was not harmonious. Her mother was suspected of being ill because she could not give birth to a boy, so her parents separated early. When Diana was eight years old, her mother made a decisive decision. Divorced and left this cannibal family.
Looking back now, my motherās choice was simply a sign of Dianaās fate.
But the young Diana did not foresee that her parents' divorce would bring her a stronger desire for a warm family. We all know the subsequent story of
.
Charles tricked Diana into that shady place, and spent his whole life in two boats. Choosing Diana as his wife allowed him to enjoy royal wealth forever, and on the love side, he blatantly had close contacts with Camilla.
spent his whole life in two different situations, which made two women suffer, especially Diana.
On the day of the engagement, the reporter interviewed the couple and asked: "Do you really love each other?"
Diana thought to herself, what a strange question, so she answered speechlessly and angrily: "Of course."
Unexpectedly, she stood aside. The newlywed husband said: "It depends on how you define love."
Diana said that this answer became her eternal nightmare.
Regarding the relationship between her husband and Camilla, she went from ignorance to clarity. During this period, she suffered from depression and bulimia. In the final confrontation, Charles's answer was:
"I don't want to be the first Wales without a mistress. Prince."
The scumbag felt confident.
The royal family has no shortage of stories about people who love beauty but not country. Charlesās grandfatherās brother, Edward VIII, became the first monarch in the history of the British royal family to voluntarily abdicate in order to be with his lover, Mrs. Simpson, who was not tolerated by the royal family.
Charles is not as good as his great-uncle, not even as good as his son Harry, who ran away for love.
On the other hand, knowing that Charles was "incurable", Diana turned around and devoted herself to public welfare undertakings. In an era when AIDS was talked about, she actively embraced AIDS patients and personally walked through minefields to arouse people's awareness of land mines. Pay attention to hidden dangers.
She said it was the love of the people that saved her.
The people Diana came into contact with on a daily basis in those years were often the disadvantaged groups who were terminally ill or disabled. She liked to talk to them because "such people tend to be more sincere."
But "becoming a people's princess rather than a princess of the British royal family" has aroused the jealousy of the royal family.
Diana's relationship with the royal family has now fallen into an endless loop:
The more the royal family members isolate her, the more she likes to get among the people.
Finally, with the increasingly obvious discord between the couple, the royal family could no longer hide it, and Diana earned herself the opportunity to divorce.
The day after Charles faced the media for the first time to respond to the "mistress rumors" and brushed himself off, Diana attended the event wearing a low-cut, knee-revealing little black dress that had crossed the royal minefield.
Just one appearance took away all the attention that belonged to Charles.
ās little black dress was also nicknamed the āRevenge Dressā by the masses.
But the most touching thing about Dianaās story is that it is not a stereotypical revenge story.
The first thing I did when I woke up recently was to see where the British royal family's version of "The Vanishing She" has progressed.
At the moment I am typing, it is already the second month since Princess Kate has disappeared.
Although according to "The Sun", Princess Kate appeared at the Windsor Farm today, she still couldn't provide a certificate for half of the photos.
The speculations (that is, various conspiracy theories) pushed by big data have become more and more terrifying, from Princess Kate suspected of suffering from a rare disease to being stabbed by a mistress, and even upgraded to William Toko (there are rumors that William's children were also involved in protective measures). Mom is Killed), to the point where The Crown could do three episodes in a row.
However, the members of the British royal family at the center of the storm tend to remain calm.
always has an official face when it comes to questioning the media and the public, and (very rarely) implements the family motto of "never complain, never explain".
Suspicion naturally intensified.
however.
I donāt really believe in the mistress stabbing theory.
The reason is, I wonāt go into details here, but letās give some background introduction to friends who havenāt paid attention to this matter.
Time goes back to the beginning of this year.
On January 18, the British royal family released an official document stating that Princess Kate had undergone an abdominal surgery the day before and was now in the hospital.
Several key pieces of information:
1. An abdominal surgery was performed the day before. The operation went smoothly and she is expected to stay in the hospital for observation for 10-14 days;
2. According to the princess's wishes, specific medical information will be kept confidential;
3. According to the doctor's orders, the princess will They will rest until Easter and will not carry out any public affairs work before; each of these
items gradually gets out of control and arouses suspicion in the subsequent development of events.
First is the discharge time.
According to official news, Princess Kate was discharged from the hospital and returned home on January 29 and is recovering well.
However, despite the intense scrutiny from the British media and some members of the public, no one took a photo of Kate being discharged from the hospital.
At the same time, King Charles, Kate's father-in-law, who was officially admitted to the hospital for treatment of "enlarged prostate", was also discharged from the hospital at the same time and appeared with his wife Camilla.
From this, the seeds of the large-scale suspense drama "Where's Kate?" were planted.
Soon, the British royal family released another big news: Charles was diagnosed with cancer.
It is said that the cancer was discovered during previous prostate treatment, but the specific type of cancer was not disclosed by the royal family.
But the paradox is that despite the news of cancer, Charles continued to complete his daily work as usual, and did not appear to be too different in front of the camera.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that Charles faked having cancer.
There are many types of cancers and they are divided into stages. Regular treatment for many early-stage cancers does not affect daily life, which is no problem. The paradox of
lies in the superposition of two facts.
Whatās incredible is that if you want to choose the place in the world that is most enthusiastic about insisting on ācanāt say noā, the British royal family will do its part.
From Queen Elizabethās father, George VI, to Queen Elizabeth herself, their major medical histories were only revealed by the media after their deaths.
The beginning of "The Crown" shows how George VI secretly battled lung cancer while handling state affairs with a straight face.
In the perception of the royal family members, they are not supporting themselves, but the dignity of the entire country.
One of the reasons why Princess Diana was so popular back then was that she was the first member of the royal family to cry openly in front of the camera. This display of human touch instantly won her a lot of favor.
But she also failed to completely reverse the nobility of the royal family.
His sons, William and Harry, could not shed tears even when attending their mother's funeral.
You can understand it as a kind of aristocratic spirit of "standing and dying", or you can understand it as an anti-humanistic patriarchal narcissism, but one thing cannot be denied:
As long as it can be tough for a day, the British royal family will not be able to show any of their own. weak.
Understanding this premise, it is not difficult to understand why the British people suspect that the news that Charles has cancer is to divert attention from Princess Kate's situation.
This is indeed not the consistent style of the British royal family.
And when the news was released, it was indeed at a time when the public had different opinions on "what disease did the princess have?"
And this is the second point of doubt:
According to the official statement, the specific condition of the illness is not announced because Kate wants to maintain privacy.
is a grand reason, but it is really difficult to convince the public.
After all, since Princess Diana, who can still believe that the British royal family can be a place where "personal feelings" are respected?
Itās not just Princess Diana. As mentioned above, the spirit of the British royal family is to serve as a symbol of the country and royal power, not as an individual.
In "The Crown", on the day Elizabeth changed from a princess to a queen, her grandmother called her and said:
"Queen Elizabeth and Elizabeth Mountbatten will fight for a lifetime, but the royal power must always win."
The successor to the royal power has been growing up since childhood. Be taught: "Nod less, smile less, talk less, breathe less."
In short, be less a living person and more a symbol.
Royal honor and royal face are always more important than your personal will.
It is also this principle that runs counter to the modern concept of freedom and equality that has spawned so many royal scandals. It is said that "where there is oppression, there is resistance."
Of course, this is a story for later.
Back to Kate, if public opinion has not escalated to the point of hurting the dignity of the royal family, people will still believe her "respect for privacy".
Now they have begun to suspect that their mistress is coming to kill people, but they are still unwilling to disclose the specific symptoms and maintain Kate's personal privacy in a way that consumes the credibility of the royal family?
Buckingham Palace probably cannot do such a humane thing.
The only possibility is that the specific medical condition he concealed will have a negative impact on the royal family that is even worse than the current suspicion.
It is also on this basis that the "wife-killing theory" is comparable to the "wife-killing theory" in palace dramas, and the "son-killing theory" began to spread vigorously. I wonāt give you specific examples of
and the so-called ācredentialsā. There are too many scraps, but too few serious ones.
Why donāt I believe that this is the case? Itās not that I believe in the character of the royal family, I just think itās unreasonable.
Stabbing someone in power can be played in a TV series, but as mentioned above, in a place like the British royal family, which is the most repressive place on human nature, if you want to "kill someone" with such a strong personal will that even the criminal law can't stop it. The way is superior, is it a bit wrong to roll on the track?
The royal conspiracy in "The Two Legends"
The logic of the British royal family's selection of concubines, it is not difficult to guess if you look at Diana and Kate who are recognized, and Camilla and Meghan who are denied.
People want Shen Meizhuang, not Qi Guiren.
There is also a theory that William worked with his mistress, which is even more ridiculous.
Camilla (she is considered to be the third partner of Charles and Diana) has already been called the back. This royal family wants the mistress to take over, so there really is no need to go to war so much.
As for William's mistress Rose, for now, they are still the kind of rumors that "can't even show a picture".
Although it is an open royal secret that "every Prince of Wales has a mistress", this cannot be used as evidence.
What is the truth?
I'm sorry, I really can't guess.
Of course, Crohn's disease was the first to be reported, and I still think it is a possibility.
Because of Crohn's disease, if it is severe, it is necessary to wear an ostomy bag (commonly known as a fecal bag).
For an ancient family that still has cumbersome and even pedantic etiquette, this is indeed a physical condition that they try their best to hide.
Crohn's disease, a disease that causes people to lose weight rapidly, can even explain the biggest mystery in the follow-up of this mystery:
The Mother's Day photo paging incident on March 10th.
Once this photo, allegedly taken by William himself, was released, Leeuwenhoeks discovered many traces of p-pictures.
Princess Kate also clarified on her own account, saying that she, like everyone else, would post photos after taking photos.
But netizens obviously don't buy it. The simple logic is:
If your condition is really as shown in the picture, then why can't you just take two steps without any illness?
It just so happens that the extremely thin state can explain the two things of p-picture and inability to show to the public at the same time.
Well, there's a bit of Sherlock Holmes going on.
Just a guess, just for fun.
The purpose of this article is actually not to solve the case, but more to express my feelings about the sentiment behind the now-popular mistress stabbing theory:
Twenty-seven years have passed, and people in the UK and even the world have probably still not been able to get over it. ptsd of anna's death.
Although Diana and Kate are both called "civilian princesses", they are compared to the royal family.
Unlike Kate who needed a loan to attend an aristocratic school, Diana actually came from a real aristocratic background.
Her father is the eighth Earl Spencer, who belongs to an old aristocratic family in Norfolk, England.
The little girl at position c is 9-year-old Diana
However, Dianaās family atmosphere was not harmonious. Her mother was suspected of being ill because she could not give birth to a boy, so her parents separated early. When Diana was eight years old, her mother made a decisive decision. Divorced and left this cannibal family.
Looking back now, my motherās choice was simply a sign of Dianaās fate.
But the young Diana did not foresee that her parents' divorce would bring her a stronger desire for a warm family. We all know the subsequent story of
.
Charles tricked Diana into that shady place, and spent his whole life in two boats. Choosing Diana as his wife allowed him to enjoy royal wealth forever, and on the love side, he blatantly had close contacts with Camilla.
spent his whole life in two different situations, which made two women suffer, especially Diana.
On the day of the engagement, the reporter interviewed the couple and asked: "Do you really love each other?"
Diana thought to herself, what a strange question, so she answered speechlessly and angrily: "Of course."
Unexpectedly, she stood aside. The newlywed husband said: "It depends on how you define love."
Diana said that this answer became her eternal nightmare.
Regarding the relationship between her husband and Camilla, she went from ignorance to clarity. During this period, she suffered from depression and bulimia. In the final confrontation, Charles's answer was:
"I don't want to be the first Wales without a mistress. Prince."
The scumbag felt confident.
The royal family has no shortage of stories about people who love beauty but not country. Charlesās grandfatherās brother, Edward VIII, became the first monarch in the history of the British royal family to voluntarily abdicate in order to be with his lover, Mrs. Simpson, who was not tolerated by the royal family.
Charles is not as good as his great-uncle, not even as good as his son Harry, who ran away for love.
On the other hand, knowing that Charles was "incurable", Diana turned around and devoted herself to public welfare undertakings. In an era when AIDS was talked about, she actively embraced AIDS patients and personally walked through minefields to arouse people's awareness of land mines. Pay attention to hidden dangers.
She said it was the love of the people that saved her.
The people Diana came into contact with on a daily basis in those years were often the disadvantaged groups who were terminally ill or disabled. She liked to talk to them because "such people tend to be more sincere."
But "becoming a people's princess rather than a princess of the British royal family" has aroused the jealousy of the royal family.
Diana's relationship with the royal family has now fallen into an endless loop:
The more the royal family members isolate her, the more she likes to get among the people.
Finally, with the increasingly obvious discord between the couple, the royal family could no longer hide it, and Diana earned herself the opportunity to divorce.
The day after Charles faced the media for the first time to respond to the "mistress rumors" and brushed himself off, Diana attended the event wearing a low-cut, knee-revealing little black dress that had crossed the royal minefield.
Just one appearance took away all the attention that belonged to Charles.
ās little black dress was also nicknamed the āRevenge Dressā by the masses.
But the most touching thing about Dianaās story is that it is not a stereotypical revenge story.
What's more, even though she experienced the tribulation of the royal family, she still adhered to her sincerity throughout her life:
always believed in exchanging heart for heart.
Revenge is to protect herself. After all, she does not want to hurt anyone, nor does she deny her desire and vulnerability for love.
In an interview many years after the divorce, when recalling the day she separated from Charles, Diana confessed that her feelings were "sadness and pain that penetrated my heart."
Hypocrisy and forbearance, Diana cannot learn.
Her signature expression is probably "I can't help it".
After answering "How to define love", the 18-year-old forced her smile for 5 seconds, but in the end she could not stop the overwhelming disappointment from overflowing.
And at the age of 34, when faced with the question "So you are isolated", she can only maintain a professional fake smile for a few seconds.
She refused Charles' kiss in public and cried in front of the camera, so she was attacked by the royal family as emotionally unstable.
You can think about the most serious criticism Diana made to Charles in her life, which was just this sentence:
"A marriage of three people is a bit too crowded, isn't it?"
Most of the time, this world is a huge vicious circle. The story of dragons is timeless.
The preciousness of Diana lies in the fact that she is the one who breaks out of the cycle.
Faced with the overt and covert entanglement of the royal family, she said that she "will definitely fight to the end", but she never bothered to fight back in the same way as the royal family.
Don't exaggerate, don't create momentum, don't shout.
Instead, admit vulnerability, admit desires, admit mistakes made in confusion, and even admit the advantages of the "enemy".
used his ultimate confession to completely defeat the royal family's painstaking efforts.
was destined to die in the pursuit of the flashlight brought by the royal family.
Nature comes and goes again, so the British people must seek justice for Diana.
The people's sadness turned into anger, and dissatisfaction with the royal family reached its highest level.
Many media such as "Express", "The Sun" and "The Independent" criticized the royal family verbally and even raised questions about the monarchy.
The flowers in memory of Diana almost overwhelmed Buckingham Palace, which had planned to refuse to hold a funeral for the "former princess".
In the end, in order to calm public anger, the royal family had to make compromises.
Sent off the legendary princess with a state funeral ceremony.
But obviously, this distrust of the British royal family still continues to this day.
The speculation about Kate's disappearance seems increasingly outrageous. In the final analysis, it is just due to the fear of Diana's tragedy happening again.
All the seemingly unfounded stories of "William's mistress stabbed his mistress" and "William stabbed his wife for his mistress" are not exactly what happened when Charles trapped Diana to death because of Camilla.
The royal family actually knows it well, doesnāt it?
has fallen into a turmoil of public opinion. It is not so much the irrationality of the people as it is the arrogance of the royal family.
But, back to Kate.
I still think she might not be Diana.
Kate's story has a clear context. She is a girl who paved the way to the royal family at the age of 15.
was born in a working-class family, but her parents had to send her to an aristocratic school even if they took out a loan.
Ben got an offer from the University of Edinburgh, but because of the news that the royal family released Prince William from St. Andrew's University, he took a year off and re-entered the same school and major.
finally succeeded in defeating William in a see-through outfit at a school catwalk show.
Campus romance + commoner princess is the footnote of Kate and William.
How you interpret this footnote depends on how you view Kate's motivations. The most widely circulated version of
regards it as the story of a scheming girl who longs for wealth and power, but in "The Crown", it is the story of an ordinary girl who truly admires the prince and truly pursues love.
Itās very typical, isnāt it? A womanās motivation is either to seek money or to court love.
Thatās not to say itās impossible. I believe both of these statements, and I donāt believe them either.
The motivation is not so pure, it may be a mixture of love and desire, which is not surprising.
But what I want to say most is whether there is a third possibility:
Kate is pursuing the position of "princess" in the true sense.
Itās just that this position is special and must be completed through marriage.
And seeking to become a "princess" is not the same as seeking power.
Power in the traditional sense refers to privilege and oppression.
When many male members of the royal family ruin their reputations, it is easy to forget that there are also many truly precious and enduring spirits buried in the decaying old papers.
Kate probably did not simply marry into the royal family with a desire for love.
Compared with Diana's "can't help it", Kate is watertight.
As long as she is in public and in front of the camera, she will always maintain her iconic smile.
People were dissatisfied with the royal family's expenses, so she immediately cut down on her clothing expenses and wore four clothes.
There is also the famous "Perfect Princess" image controversy:
Every time after giving birth, she would stand in front of the camera as if nothing happened for 24 hours.
As for the private grievances with Meghan in the tabloids, although I donāt know the truth, Kate did ānever complain and never explain.ā
Only after we succeeded one by one did we win the hearts and minds of the people.
In terms of behavior, Kate is impeccable and is not in the royal family's false pretense of protecting each other.
But in the sense of a man who truly agrees with the phrase "loyalty to the people throughout his life" that is often heard in royal coronation speeches.
Because of this, Kate will most likely not follow Diana's path.
If she is a woman who purely regards being a princess as her career, then she will naturally castrate some of the expectations that her mother-in-law had for the royal family.
But after all, it is too difficult to be a clean person in a dirty place.
From this perspective, peopleās concerns about Kate and Diana ending up together by different paths may not be empty talk.
I hope nothing happens to Kate, firstly because she deserves it, and secondly because of my subtle selfishness.
is both looking forward to William, the son that Diana loved deeply and raised personally.
In Harry's autobiography "The Spare Tire", he once mentioned a dispute with William.
In an extremely emotional state, William said "I swear on my mother's life" in order to make Harry believe what he said.
Then everyone present fell silent.
Harry said that this word is a universal secret talisman among them, and it can only be used when the most critical situation is when the other party's unconditional trust is most needed.
This shows the importance of Diana in the lives of these two boys.
I remember that in "The Crown", during the father-son conversation after the death of his mother, William yelled at Charles: "You killed her."
But in reality, at the wedding of Charles and Camilla, Harry handed over the The petals hit my father hard.
This is the strong trace left by the personality of mother Diana Zhijie on the two boys who lived in an environment of royal power and, most importantly, the vested interests of patriarchy.
There is no shortage of menās life stories in the world that ālove their mothers and become fathersā.
I really long for something different.
Diana has already given a perfect answer to all the rumors and difficulties faced by the royal family, right?
symbolizes patriarchal arrogance and control, which will never bring peace.
Sincerity, listening, empathy, and kindness.
This is the answer written by two generations of princesses.
And to the prince William.
If he can get rid of the cycle of questioning his father, understanding his father, and becoming a father in this life.
Only then can the sorrow of Diana in this world be cured.
But what I want to say most is whether there is a third possibility:
Kate is pursuing the position of "princess" in the true sense.
Itās just that this position is special and must be completed through marriage.
And seeking to become a "princess" is not the same as seeking power.
Power in the traditional sense refers to privilege and oppression.
When many male members of the royal family ruin their reputations, it is easy to forget that there are also many truly precious and enduring spirits buried in the decaying old papers.
Kate probably did not simply marry into the royal family with a desire for love.
Compared with Diana's "can't help it", Kate is watertight.
As long as she is in public and in front of the camera, she will always maintain her iconic smile.
People were dissatisfied with the royal family's expenses, so she immediately cut down on her clothing expenses and wore four clothes.
There is also the famous "Perfect Princess" image controversy:
Every time after giving birth, she would stand in front of the camera as if nothing happened for 24 hours.
As for the private grievances with Meghan in the tabloids, although I donāt know the truth, Kate did ānever complain and never explain.ā
Only after we succeeded one by one did we win the hearts and minds of the people.
In terms of behavior, Kate is impeccable and is not in the royal family's false pretense of protecting each other.
But in the sense of a man who truly agrees with the phrase "loyalty to the people throughout his life" that is often heard in royal coronation speeches.
Because of this, Kate will most likely not follow Diana's path.
If she is a woman who purely regards being a princess as her career, then she will naturally castrate some of the expectations that her mother-in-law had for the royal family.
But after all, it is too difficult to be a clean person in a dirty place.
From this perspective, peopleās concerns about Kate and Diana ending up together by different paths may not be empty talk.
I hope nothing happens to Kate, firstly because she deserves it, and secondly because of my subtle selfishness.
is both looking forward to William, the son that Diana loved deeply and raised personally.
In Harry's autobiography "The Spare Tire", he once mentioned a dispute with William.
In an extremely emotional state, William said "I swear on my mother's life" in order to make Harry believe what he said.
Then everyone present fell silent.
Harry said that this word is a universal secret talisman among them, and it can only be used when the most critical situation is when the other party's unconditional trust is most needed.
This shows the importance of Diana in the lives of these two boys.
I remember that in "The Crown", during the father-son conversation after the death of his mother, William yelled at Charles: "You killed her."
But in reality, at the wedding of Charles and Camilla, Harry handed over the The petals hit my father hard.
This is the strong trace left by the personality of mother Diana Zhijie on the two boys who lived in an environment of royal power and, most importantly, the vested interests of patriarchy.
There is no shortage of menās life stories in the world that ālove their mothers and become fathersā.
I really long for something different.
Diana has already given a perfect answer to all the rumors and difficulties faced by the royal family, right?
symbolizes patriarchal arrogance and control, which will never bring peace.
Sincerity, listening, empathy, and kindness.
This is the answer written by two generations of princesses.
And to the prince William.
If he can get rid of the cycle of questioning his father, understanding his father, and becoming a father in this life.
Only then can the sorrow of Diana in this world be cured.
