There will be certain problems in this aspect of narrative logic. The more exciting content in the first two episodes of the work is that a Chinese medicine practitioner has been constantly awakening when facing the patient, and then succeeded after two weeks. 
In this work, there will be doctors from well-known hospitals as consultants, so in terms of medical attempts, you can completely make everyone believe in the content of the plot. There are some Chinese medicine content in the middle, which is true and trustworthy.
There will be some things that do not conform to the narrative logic in this plot. For example, during the whole treatment process, Chinese medicine will have its own methods, and Western medicine will have its own methods. Why do you have to choose the method of traditional Chinese medicine in this work? In the content of the plot, there will be problems that the media and the family members of patients cannot wait. It takes nearly two weeks to choose the treatment method of traditional Chinese medicine. How long does it take western medicine? There is no display in this work whether it is faster or slower, people really don't know.
Since this is the case, the narrative logic this time is obviously incorrect. It seems that we want to let everyone know why this patient chooses the treatment method of traditional Chinese medicine, not the treatment method of Western medicine. It may be that everyone is not particularly meticulous when looking at the works, and has been constantly looking for answers, but they have never found them. In the second content of
, what method was used in the process of treatment, especially why the attending doctor was a male protagonist at a critical moment? If you choose to come to the plantation to pick some Chinese medicine, what kind of Chinese medicine are you picking? How does this Chinese medicine work? Are there any basic explanations in this plot content, so people will also feel as if there is some lack of persuasion. From this aspect, people will also see that this work seems to have some problems, and there are many places that need to be re-discussed. Obviously, only through these methods, the effect is not very good.
