why no one believes?
Why is it funny if no one believes it? Why doesn't
laugh enough, and continue to play memes, discuss, and complain on hot searches?
In modern words, this is a proper "Joke of Hell" .
is not just for being funny.
Besides laughter, we can't seem to find a better posture to face the silence and helplessness behind laughter.
There was a news two days ago, which can be called "real full version" .
Sir also found it funny at first:
held a "clean culture theme" essay call somewhere, and an essay called "My Magistrate Father" won the first prize.
quickly aroused ridicule among netizens.
Many people directly talk about famous scenes, saying that movies have come into reality.
was quick, taunting was slapped in the face.
When sensible netizens carefully examine the original text of the manuscript.
found that the county magistrate in the article was named Yu Zhiming. He joined the revolution at the age of 14. In 1955, at the age of 26, he became the first magistrate of Yucheng County elected by the people after the founding of New China.
In 58, he was demoted and lowered his salary because of his opposition to exaggeration and communism. During the difficult three years, Yu's family was too poor to open the pot, and his elder brother went out to beg for food; Yu Zhiming was so hungry that he pressed a hole on his leg, and still chose to keep his promise to send money to the families of the martyrs. ; After the reform and opening up, his son and nephew's work, he never said hello, let alone take the initiative to arrange ...
how to see, are Jiao Yulu-style good cadres.
But when it was on the hot search, everyone was saying that this was the real version of Yuan Hua.
More and more people read the article.
especially found that the county magistrate had passed away in 1988, and the author of the article was just an ordinary retired old man.
Those netizens were embarrassed and apologized on a large scale.
can be reversed and come again -
The Texas Writers Association has deleted the award-winning information when it saw the outrage among netizens.
directly triggered the second wave of public opinion.
is rude, why did
delete it?
deleted the article because it was a temporary meme. It's too sad. Why did
delete it? Is
"My Magistrate's Father" not in line with the theme of the call for papers? Still not meeting the award criteria?
If the judges unanimously agree that it is in line with it, and it is not "guilty of being a thief", why should the article be deleted?
even sent a question directly:
deleted the post, I'm afraid there is something tricky.
In an interview with " China News Weekly ", the Texas Federation of Literary and Art Circles explained:
The Texas Writers Association is a non-governmental organization, and the selection of the essay contest itself is compliant.
The Texas Writers Association also responded later, saying that the deletion was "not wanting to attract attention."
right.
is really scared.
So, between believing and not believing, fearing and not being afraid, public opinion gradually tore out a magical big net.
live everyone.
It implicitly changes everyone's expression in the public domain.
The first layer of this network is called "spectatorization".
When the hot search bursts out, and netizens are eating melons and chasing hot spots, there will always be a common phenomenon:
and other reversals.
Entertainment news. The same goes for
social news.
This is still the case even with news involving national events and international hotspots.
And behind this word, it is the presupposition of many people after being fooled: things are not so simple, and there is the possibility of being slapped in the face afterwards.
is also anticipating some kind of excitement.
When the inversion is no longer an accident, it becomes an expectation.
undoubtedly brings two meanings.
1, don't follow the trend for the first time, don't make a statement, wait for more information to make a judgment, this is the performance of the gradual improvement of the quality of netizens who have been tossed by the news in the past.
2, these complex events in the public opinion field are gradually being held high by netizens, and gradually become the spiritual nourishment of spectators.
In other words:
As we become more and more "rational", it is actually more and more difficult to get involved and take matters into account.
is more and more accustomed to viewing news events in public opinion --
as a play.
Every action and every clue of the parties is equivalent to a "dramatic climax" in a long work.
pulls out more emotions and more explosions.
So when My Magistrate Father came out. The first reaction of
netizens was not the article itself, but the plot of the movie " Charlotte Troubled ".
doesn't even ask if it's right or not, in front of the title, you have to get over your mouth first.
also uses Shen Teng as a mouthpiece:
is he more than learning?z someone might say. Isn't also sensible? But often, when there is no conclusion, it is the time when public opinion is the most violent. catch language sickness, pick up black material, deduct hats... or develop to send private messages to abuse, comment area online violence, and even offline interference. What's up with this? The second layer of this network, "entertainment" . Many events are a "play" to the public, and they are cool and bloody. lacks solid detail, adequate context... is all about dramatic emotional explosions: who seems to be in trouble. who reversed. who got hammered to death again. Why did the Texas Federation of Literary and Art Circles say such helpless words as "don't want to attract attention"? Because most people understand: The current public opinion has the ability to change the truth (distort the truth). But less and less people realize that the process of is also part of the "fact". This is the most desperate layer of this network. It's hard for us to really participate in "public opinion" anymore. joked because of aphasia. can't judge, just put it out. can only be divided into two factions in the end: believe it or not. wrong, right. is very TA, step on TA. is willing to be an ostrich in the overwhelming information flow, burying his head and shaking his ass. Is there any way to change ? What can ordinary people do in this doomed landslide? A few days ago, Luo Xiang and Yu Hua had a conversation. Sir thinks it's worth checking out by everyone. only intercepted one of them today. Maybe it helps us understand the less funny part of the silence in reality. Luo Xiang once again reiterated one of his favorite quotes, from the philosopher Epicted: Many people often hear me quote Epicted We are on a stage that we did not choose a lot of things are not Sir has also seen many young people recently, citing this sentence to comfort himself. But is this sentence full of regrets? Yu Hua interjected at this time. He added this based on his own writing and life experience: Even if we can't decide the plot, we must say our lines well. Since the lines are not determined by us, because sometimes the lines change the plot
It is not us The script chosen
you can choose but the problem is
when the invisible hand gives you a script
you have to play it
in the theater of times and fate.
because sometimes, the lines will change the plot.
, the lines are determined by us.
is what we say on what occasion.
what is our destiny? Saying your own lines is enough
