wrote some opinions on " Hidden into the Dust ", which was criticized by many people. The criticism focused on two points. One is that you have not experienced rural life, so don't blame it; the other is the suffering shown in the film. It is to awaken the broad masses of the people, to face the dark corners of society, and not to pretend to be invisible.
What I want to say is that what I object to is not the two points you mentioned. What I most object to is going abroad to participate in exhibitions and win awards. Why don't you criticize me for this? Is the director participating in the competition for three awards to arouse the conscience of European and American countries? Is it to let foreign rich people hold a charity dinner for China, because they do not face China's development in their bones, they are more willing to smear China, and the director just provided the material.
Although the country has entered a well-off society in an all-round way, there is always poverty, and the indifference between people caused by poverty is even more common. We will not shy away from these because the country and the people are working hard to improve them.
don't know what was the original intention of the director to make this film? Let two miserable people combine all the sufferings, lack family affection, have no material, and the spiritual satisfaction is only short-lived. If you want to use this film to arouse people's attention and reform in the current countryside, and to arouse the country's awareness that the poverty alleviation policy has not been fully implemented (but you didn't mention the national policy at all), I respect you as a man. If you just recall the misery in the countryside in the past, and focus all the misery you can imagine on the protagonist and use it to sell misery, then you are shooting bullshit. Some netizens on
suggested that I watch rural love and anti-Japanese dramas. The former is just a comedy, without bitterness and hatred. It just vilifies some disabled people and makes people despise, but there are orchards, small wines and new countryside. The latter is just the director's excessive obscenity, which has become two extremes with "Hidden in the Dust", and is not recommended.
thinks that there should be more movies like " Wolf Warriors ". "Wolf Warriors" and "Avengers" express the same thing, the powerful ability of a country and technology can save itself and save the earth when it faces threats. Those who criticize "Wolf Warrior" have a very small pattern.
Although I am from a rural area, my growing environment is not like the one in the movie, it is more about warmth and mutual assistance. I admit that no experience does not mean no, but it has nothing to do with me thinking that the director is going abroad to sell miserable. It is enough for China to have a Jia Zhangke , not to mention that Jia Jia has already transformed, and the release of "Hidden Into the Dust" means that the country recognizes the shortcomings in the work, and has enough courage and ability to solve such problems, which is more tolerant and great.
finally persuaded the director to say that it's fine to release it in China, don't go abroad to get eyeballs, how many awards abroad give you is not an affirmation of your movie.
