How do you understand the teacher's statement, "The book "Water Margin" is a good thing to surrender?"

news 1195℃

article | Tao Shu

first release | Tao Ranji (ID: taoranji2022)

release | Xu Ranshuo (ID: xuranshuo)


teacher commented on "Water Margin" in his later years. He said:


"The book "Water Margin" is good for surrender. It is a negative teaching material, so that people know the surrender." In "Biography", many heroes in Liangshan ended up miserably because they were led astray by the capitulation faction headed by Song Jiang, which could have a certain enlightening and educational effect on the people.


But to fully understand the capitulation faction, it will be more direct to find negative teaching materials from the actual revolutionary practice.


Especially, when we expand our vision to the whole world and compare several vivid cases of capitulation, we can get a deeper understanding.


How do you understand the teacher's statement, 'The book 'Water Margin' is a good thing to surrender?' - Lujuba



01


In recent years, the newest surrender faction of international communist movement is Prachanda of Nepal .


How do you understand the teacher's statement, 'The book 'Water Margin' is a good thing to surrender?' - Lujuba

"Brother Gongming" Prachanda in Nepal


Prachanda, formerly known as Pasuba Kamel Dahar, was born in 1954 in a peasant family in central and western Nepal.


In 1995, Prachanda changed the name of a branch of the Communist Party of Nepal under his leadership to the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist), referred to as the Communist Party of Nepal (Mao).


At that time, Nepal was still under the rule of the feudal royal family and under the control of the two imperialists of the United States and India. The entire country is disconnected from the world, and the closure and backwardness are like a backwater. Political parties attack each other on the surface, but secretly collude with each other for corruption.


Out of desperation for the current state of Nigeria, Prachanda changed the name of the party, which is determined to take the teacher's thinking as a guide to seize power by arms and build a country that belongs to the people. After the name change of


, ​​there was practical action soon.


In February 1996, Prachanda and his strategist Babram Batraei plotted together and made a big news.


They submitted a document to the government, publicly proposing 40 political propositions such as overthrowing the monarchy and abolishing unequal treaties, and set a time limit for a response.


Deuba of the Congress Party at the time was prime minister. This man was brought to power by India and has a deep Western background. Facing Prachanda's revolutionary manifesto, he dismissed it as just another political show by a small party.


Kathmandu political circles are cynical, just waiting to see Prachanda's jokes.


Unexpectedly, Prachanda said it was true. On February 13, he led more than 100 followers with two broken guns, resolutely left the capital and plunged into the deep mountains and forests of Rolpa County in the west, opening the curtain of the armed struggle.


How do you understand the teacher's statement, 'The book 'Water Margin' is a good thing to surrender?' - Lujuba


Prachanda's team actively mobilized the masses, vigorously implemented land reform, confiscated the land of the landlords and distributed it to the poor farmers, and learned the methods of the teachers.


The vast majority of civilians who have been exploited and oppressed for a long time are boiling. They warmly welcome the policies of the Maoists and join the army to support the revolution.


At the same time, the Nigerian reactionary government finally figured out the situation and began a brutal crackdown.


The authorities have set up a special armed police force, which is not restricted by any law and can arbitrarily arrest, imprison, torture, and shoot anyone suspected of being a member of the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) organization.


Prachanda, undeterred by the enemy's counterattack, insisted on leading the armed struggle.


He shared weal and woe with the soldiers. He ate bibimbap with beans, which was often eaten by farmers. He seldom even had meat and fish like fish. He only had two or three sets of the cheapest T-shirts to cover his body.


Despite the harsh conditions, the revolutionary team was full of confidence. They believed that under the leadership of Prachanda, the revolution would be successful.


After arduous struggle, ten years later, the total number of Maoist armed forces reached 40,000, and they controlled 80% of Nepal's territory. People's governments were established in these places and genuine democratic elections were held. The reactionary government's order is hardly half a step out of Kathmandu.


Seeing that the revolutionary army is about to enter the capital, the public in Kathmandu is in chaos, and the US and Indian imperialists are also panicking. Together, they exerted strong pressure on the CPN (Maoist).


Internal and external enemies unite to kill. For the CCP, this question is familiar to me. If Prachanda is a good student, he can find reference answers by flipping through a book. How did he answer?


Prachanda decided to negotiate peace with several major parties, promising not only to participate in the general election, but also to disarm the guerrillas under his command, in exchange for nothing more than overthrowing the royal family and turning Nepal into a republic.


It's been ten years, and a test paper was originally written in beautiful flowers, but when the final test bell rang, he tore up the paper.


Revolutionary fighters shed blood just to knock down a crown?


This is not surrender, what is surrender? This is not betrayal, what is betrayal?


Prachanda, however, was outspoken, saying that what the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) gave up was only the form of struggle of armed revolution, and the goal of struggle was still to promote land reform and distribute land for the majority of peasants to live on.


He also put forward a very wonderful goal, to make Nepal "Asia's Switzerland ", a paradise on earth.


Prachanda said that, how does it actually work?


Everything went well at first. In the 2008 Nepalese general election, the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) won 40% of the seats and became the largest party in the parliament, with Prachanda as prime minister.


ascended to the pinnacle of power as he wished, and Prachanda was in high spirits. But less than a year later, Prachanda had to step down because of a conflict with the president of the Congress Party, who pushed the military to refuse to implement his orders.


After several years of preparation, the CPN (Mao) made a comeback and came to power again in 2011.


However, due to a series of behind-the-scenes transactions, Prachanda's closest comrade-in-arms Battrai was replaced as prime minister.


this and PrachanIn order to please India and other parties in the parliament, Batrai, who had been fighting together in the deep mountains for ten years, even promised to return the land and property of the landlords and capitalists captured during the armed revolution.


's hard-won revolutionary achievements were overthrown by the capitulationists. Since then, the CPN (Maoist) has never really fought for the interests of the peasants, and has completely degenerated into a party of lords.


What happened to the capitulation faction himself?


Even if the revolutionary ideal was completely abandoned, the Batraj government lasted only 18 months. After that, the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) was seen clearly by the people and was cast aside. The votes it won in previous elections were dwindling. After several splits within the party, its influence fell off a cliff.


How do you understand the teacher's statement, 'The book 'Water Margin' is a good thing to surrender?' - Lujuba


Prachanda is getting further and further away from the coveted premiership. As a last resort, he actually joined forces with his former mortal enemy, Deuba, who had brutally suppressed the revolution and whose hands were stained with the blood of the people.


The two sides reached an agreement in July 2016. Prachanda led the Communist Party of Nepal (Mao) to defect from the ruling coalition at that time and formed a coalition government with the Congress Party. Finally, after another 9 months of Prime Minister addiction, it was handed over to Germany. upa.


Prachanda has completely released himself and has made no secret of his traitorous character.


At the Eighth National Congress of the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) in December 2021, Prachanda, in his report on political ideology, claimed that it was wrong to preach revolution in the past.


He himself has long been corrupted and depraved, reports of his extravagant life appear from time to time, he owns a luxury house and a luxury car, and every time he appears, he is a well-dressed, full of elite style.


In November 2012, at a reception for the festival of lights, Prachanda was slapped by a man named Kunwal, who was reportedly one of his die-hard supporters.


And the ones that chill supporters are still to come.


In February of this year, Prachanda had another big job.


He joined forces with the Deuba government, which has come to power again, to approve the five-year-delayed Nepal-US Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) partnership agreement in parliament.


This agreement seriously infringes upon Nepal's sovereignty, in exchange for a mere hundreds of millions of dollars in aid drawn by the United States.


For political gain, Prachanda went from being a revolutionary to surrendering to being a traitor and finally to betraying the country.



02


Why does the teacher want the people to know about the capitulation faction?


because the capitulation faction was also a revolutionary in the past, and indeed fought for the people. They will continue to confuse the people with their past achievements and continue to reap the benefits.


Prachanda became a capitulationist, but he used rhetoric to deceive the Nepalese people. It took some people a few years to see his face clearly, and some people spent more than ten years.


If the people of Nepal had known about the capitulation faction, they would not have been fooled for so long.


Why can't you trust the capitulationists?


Because from the moment they surrendered, they were on the opposite side of the people. No matter how arduous and glorious the revolutionary experience was, as long as it is separated from the people, sooner or later all rhetoric will be completely betrayed by them.


The root cause of this involves aThe core question of the history of China's revolution: Where does the revolutionary force come from? The reason why


teachers can lead the Chinese Communist Party to win the revolution is because they have found the most powerful source of the Chinese revolution: the Chinese people with farmers as the main body.


In order to inspire and guide this force into the Chinese revolution, the instructors put forward a series of theories and propositions:


Whether it is the land revolution or the fundamental purpose of "serving the people", the instructors thoroughly integrate the party and the people into one. , build the army into a people's army, and build the country into a people's republic.


comes from the people, and for the people, is the fundamental foothold of the teacher's revolutionary experience.


It is precisely because of the strong backing that the CCP under the leadership of the teachers can unswervingly adhere to the revolutionary position in the face of all enemies.


's insistence on a revolutionary stance does not mean that compromises cannot be made. In order to unite all forces that can be united, some adjustments can be made in methods and methods to take care of the interests of allies.


During the Anti-Japanese War , in order to achieve the anti-Japanese national united front , the CCP adjusted its policies significantly.


For example, the land policy has been adjusted from "divide the land by the local tyrants" to "the landlord will reduce rent and interest, and farmers will pay rent and interest."


But compromise is not the same as surrender.


The biggest difference between the two is whether to maintain autonomy. And the confidence to maintain independence is to firmly grasp the party's armed forces in their own hands, and always insist on seeking benefits for the people and maintaining blood ties with the people.


In 2006, when the CPN (Maoist) faced a joint attack by internal and external enemies, according to the revolutionary experience of the teachers, they could choose to compromise and reach a ceasefire with the central government in Kathmandu.


After the ceasefire, the central government of Nepal continued to exist, and the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) governed the areas that had already been laid down, just like the relationship between the National Government and the border government.


Since the CPN (Maoist) is not strong enough to take over the whole country, it should first obtain a legal identity and compete with the reactionaries for governance ability.


The Communist Party of Nepal (Mao) has a gun in its hands and has its own territory. If you let go of your hands and engage in land reform, you don't need to look at any power. That was the beginning of change in Nepal.


Prachanda, however, abandoned all the achievements of the revolution, laid down his weapons, and gave up his territory. This is by no means a compromise, but a real surrender. After


surrendered, the revolutionary force was completely lost, and any reform that touched vested interests could not be passed by those in power. All the rhetoric, even if the promise was made with sincerity at first, could not be fulfilled in the end, and all became a lie. (Can't help but think of Xibei Yueting)


At this point, the CPN (Mao) led by Prachanda is even inferior to Afghan Taliban .


The U.S. and India just made a three-point effort, Prachanda couldn't wait to kneel, and the Taliban had endured 20 years of indiscriminate bombardment, and finally forced the U.S. emperor to evacuate in a dismal manner, winning the country's favor. independent.


Prachanda, a self-proclaimed student of the faculty, really doesn't understand the difference between surrender and compromise?


is neither.


He just doesn't want to be a gangster anymore. He wants to bring his little brother back to the DPRK and enter the city as soon as possible to become an official - an official hat of the first Prime Minister of the Republic after the overthrow of the royal family is enough to satisfy his vanity.


On the eve of the victory of the revolution, Prachanda knelt. On the surface, what he is kneeling on is the obscenity of US-Indian imperialism, but in fact he is kneeling for the selfish interests of his political clique.


How do you understand the teacher's statement, 'The book 'Water Margin' is a good thing to surrender?' - Lujuba



03


Prachanda surrendered easily without fighting to the death of the enemy, which makes people regret and hate. It has been decades since the revolution succeeded, but still surrendered, what should we do?


was talking about the Soviet Union, of course.


When the Soviet was just established, it was faced with the invasion of 14 imperialist countries. When the storm was precarious, the Soviet Union did not surrender; However, it surrendered after the global situation eased and entered a period of peaceful development.


When we know the surrendering faction, and then review the whole process of 's disintegration of the Soviet Union, we can clearly find the hidden conspiracy and deception.


The cause of the collapse of the Soviet Union is undoubtedly a series of wrong policies by Gorbachev. There are still people who wash the ground for him, thinking that he was just incompetent and made mistakes.


However, as early as 1999, in a speech, Gorbachev confessed: "The purpose of my life is to eliminate communism!"


So he is not stupid at all, but completely bad!


To achieve this goal, Gorbachev began his own plan after he became the supreme leader of the Soviet Union in 1985. The core of the


plan is very simple, to intensify the people's dissatisfaction with the state, and to direct them to the Soviet system.


Gorbachev first implemented the "strategic policy of accelerating the country's social and economic development" and vigorously developed heavy industry, claiming that in 15 years, national income and gross industrial production would double.


The Soviet heavy industry has long been saturated, and what is urgently needed is light industry and agriculture to improve people's livelihood. Ordinary people line up in stores every day to buy daily necessities, and Gorbachev has to work hard to produce machines that can't be eaten, and is simply feeding people with diarrhea.


has accelerated for three years, the economy is getting thinner and thinner, and people's grievances are overwhelming.


and so on is this effect, Gorbachev took advantage of the situation to launch "new thinking", political settlement of economic problems, and promote Western-style democracy and pluralism.


He stuffed a large number of capitulationists into party and government organs at all levels, and pro-Western figures in society also came to the front. These people tried their best to exaggerate the difficulties of the country, attacked the system aggressively, and created public opinion for the change of the world.


By this time, Gorbachev's plan is progressing smoothly, and the intended goal of peaceful evolution will soon be achieved.


But he missed one person:


Yeltsin.


How do you understand the teacher's statement, 'The book 'Water Margin' is a good thing to surrender?' - Lujuba


Taking a ride on Gorbachev's reform of , Yeltsin rose rapidly. But he was not satisfied and wanted to replace Gorbachev.


In order to achieve his ambitions, he went to great lengths to find Gorbachev's loopholes.


Gorbachev's original intention was to abolish the Soviet system, but he didn't want the Soviet Union to disintegrate. He and his own political group will continue to be in power, and it will not do him any good to destroy the Soviet Union.


But Yeltsin is different. He is rising too fast and lacks foundation. In order to find a backer as soon as possible, he aimed at two forces.


The first group is economic bureaucrats.


Surrounding Gorbachev is a group of liberal advocates who value theory and writing, and economic bureaucrats can only stand aside.


Yeltsin figured out how these people wanted to divide up the nation's wealth, and vigorously preached that only by letting the rich take power can the country lead to prosperity and stability.


Another group is Russian nationalists.


For a long time, Russia, as the largest and most powerful republic in the Soviet Union, has been providing economic blood transfusions for other affiliated brothers, and the big Russians have long been dissatisfied with this.


Yeltsin colluded with them to separate Russia from the Soviet Union and get rid of the burden.


On surrender, Yeltsin was much more professional than Gorbachev.


The internal reactionary forces are very satisfied, and Western imperialism is even more overjoyed. When the internal and external enemies are combined, Yeltsin's kneeling posture is more beautiful, that's him!


with reinforcements, Yeltsin began to run wild on the road to surrender.


In July 1990, at the 28th Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, Yeltsin announced his withdrawal from the Communist Party of the Soviet Union and shoveled the first shovel to bury the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.


On August 23, 1991, after the "8.19" coup d'etat, the last effort to save the Soviet Union, Yeltsin signed the "Order on Suspension of Activities of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation" as President of Russia.


On August 24, Gorbachev issued a statement announcing his resignation as general secretary of the CPSU Central Committee and suggested that the CPSU Central Committee "dissolve itself". As the soul of the country, the Communist Party of the Soviet Union has been wiped out, the Soviet Union has become a walking corpse, and its demise is only a matter of time.


On December 7th, Yeltsin and the leaders of Ukraine and Belarus signed the Belovyz Agreement , announcing that the Soviet Union ceased to exist. The republics became independent and broke away from the Soviet Union.


On December 25, Gorbachev resigned, handing over state power to Russian President Boris Yeltsin.


On December 26th, the delegates raised their hands symbolically, The Supreme Soviet of the USSR self-dissolved, marking the official end of the USSR as a sovereign state from law and reality.


Gorbachev was continuously backstabbed by Yeltsin, and he never kept up with the rhythm of surrender. After 5 years of hustle and bustle, he finally made Yeltsin a wedding dress.


Gorbachev's ideals outweighed reality. He truly believed that the Soviet system was inferior to the West, so he knelt down and deliberately wanted to abolish this system.


On the other hand, Yeltsin was more realistic than ideal. He was in turmoil with interest groups, getting promoted and getting rich to get what he needed. He also knelt down, kneeling more thoroughly and successfully, using all means to destroy the Soviet Union.


When Gorbachev made up his mind to surrender, he never imagined that the surrender would be aContest, he will be defeated by the capitulation faction.


How do you understand the teacher's statement, 'The book 'Water Margin' is a good thing to surrender?' - Lujuba



04


The Soviet Union disintegrated, the capitulators were in power, the people were happy and ready for a new life.


They sincerely believe that if a group of wealthy people who respect the Western model govern this country, they will surely have a prosperous future like that of Europe and the United States.


But there's a question to address first: Who are the rich people who lead this country? Although


used to be full of various privileges, the income gap was not large, and the rich and the poor could not be distinguished. As soon as the Soviet Union disintegrated, a group of rich people popped out of nowhere.


The rich are the party and government bureaucrats and state-owned enterprise managers who helped Yeltsin seize power.


Chernomyrdin, who served as prime minister of Russia, was minister of natural gas industry in the Soviet Union in the 1980s.


After the privatization of the natural gas company in 1992, Chernomyrdin became the most powerful shareholder of the natural gas company. He controls more than 40% of the world's natural gas resources and is one of the richest people in the world.


Korkovsky, former secretary of the Communist Youth League of the Soviet Union, founded a big bank that turned wealth that belonged to the people into personal assets.


Eight large private groups in Russia once owned 85% of the shares of 64 top domestic companies, and these 64 companies accounted for 25% of Russia's GDP.


The bureaucrats kept up with the times and turned into oligarchs and business elites who are still the rulers of the country.


For the oligarchs, Russia has indeed become their paradise. They cheered their surrender and hated not having surrendered sooner.


So, how are the people from the capitulation faction doing?


Yeltsin was in power until 1999. By the end of that year, one-third of Russia's population, about 50 million people, lived below the poverty line of $37 a month, and 8.7 million were unemployed.


The income ratio of the top 10% of the Russians to the bottom 10% increased from 8:1 in 1990 to 13:1 in 1996.


The economic downturn has led to a low level of social security, increased pressure on people's lives, and a significant increase in suicide and death rates. The suicide rate in Russia increased from 31 per 100,000 in 1992 to 39.4 in 1996.


The average life expectancy dropped from 70 years in Soviet times to 65 years in 2000, among which men are less than 60 years old. Higher mortality rates among male populations are associated with unemployment, reduced income, stressful lives, and alcoholism.


On December 31, 1999, Yeltsin gave his last speech as president, and he admitted:


"I had hoped that by a single jump, I would be able to get rid of the stagnant, authoritarian era and move towards a prosperous, civilized future, and this jump It didn't work out, to a certain extent, I was too naive, in fact the problem is much more complicated, and many people have experienced hardships and losses in this complex era." The enemy surrendered, such a disaster for the countryThe people who bring disaster to the people actually consider themselves "naive and naive". The shamelessness of the capitulation faction was most vividly shown in Yeltsin.


It took ten years for the Russian people to finally see Yeltsin's face clearly, but so what, and where do they regret it?


The national elites who really care about the future of the country are also regretting it.


Putin took over from the "naive" Yeltsin and it was a mess. Under his rule, Russia has slowly recovered some vigour.


In the process of governing the country, Putin deeply felt that the regime lacked strong support.


Russia now has long been impacted by Western ideology, and whenever the country faces a major test, there are always various forces that cooperate with the West to create chaos.


There was a time when Putin tried to restore the Soviet Union, but little brother Medvedev persuaded him: Big brother, you have to be sober, we are capitulationists. If the Soviet Union were to be restored, wouldn't the people not be able to invite back the Communist Party of the true roots?


figured this out, so Putin said:


"Whoever does not miss the Soviet Union has no conscience; whoever wants to return to the Soviet Union has no brain!" A revolution, otherwise Russia cannot turn back and can only be led to an unknown future by the capitulators.


A former superpower, a country founded by the first proletariat of mankind, was easily destroyed by the capitulationists.


Gorbachev and Yeltsin surrendered. The reason they deceived the people was that the Soviet system could not solve the country's difficulties, so they knelt to the West, but in fact they knelt down for the selfish interests of their respective groups and the greed to divide up the country's wealth.


How do you understand the teacher's statement, 'The book 'Water Margin' is a good thing to surrender?' - Lujuba



05


Why does the instructor want the people to know the surrender faction?


Because whenever a party capitulates it will bring destruction to the revolution and disaster to the people. And the capitulation faction is the best at disguise, always under the name of a beautiful banner to confuse the people.


When the revolution failed, Prachanda surrendered, citing the pain of ending the civil war and avoiding sanctions on Nepal.


The revolution has been won, Gorbachev and Yeltsin want to surrender, the reason is that the Soviet system is not good, and they want to lead the people to live a good life in the West.


talks about the people and thinks about selfish interests.


The people can't see them clearly, fall for them, let them usurp the country, then their true faces will be completely exposed, but it's too late to regret it.


The interests of the capitulation faction are so great that they are motivated to continue to invent new tricks.


There was a time when the public knowledge network was rampant, capitalists pretended to be social conscience, and infinitely magnified social phenomena. There is also a real estate developer who drove a large-displacement car to the streets of Beijing to measure air pollution, and performed absurd drama .


They can't hold back their ambitions and selfish desires and want to make trouble. Many people were confused by them, and the public opinion field was filled with smog for a long time.


Fortunately, this evil spirit was finally cleaned up.


The surrender faction will not be reconciled, and they will continue to lurk and wait for opportunities.


Even though the power of Western countries led by the United States is declining and it is becoming more and more difficult to deceive the people, they have found a new reason for surrender: human nature!


They say with certainty that human nature is selfish, and the socialist system and the public economy are both contrary to selfish human nature. This reason is more deceptive, more subtle, and requires the people to keep their eyes open.


And the absurdity of their logic is obvious. According to them, no human society should emerge. There are only selfish desires without public interests, and society has long since collapsed.


They make up all kinds of reasons, and their thoughts are for self-interest. They form circles, inherit family traditions, and spread colonial thinking, just waiting for the day when they divide up the nation's wealth.


The capitulators are the most dangerous enemies within, both before and after the victory of the revolution. The teacher


wants the people to know the capitulation faction. He sees it very far. He is worried about the people, and the people must not let him down.




Hello, I would like to recommend a pure original treasure WeChat public account: [Tao Ranji]. The co-creation base of Xuran and Uncle Tao. If you approve of our articles, please recommend us solemnly to your friends.


Tao Ranji is a pure original account. In this self-media world where plagiarism and editing are everywhere, less than 4% of the pure original public account is very rare. The content of Tao Ranji is mainly based on the history of the party, with interesting style and solid content.


Learn from the teachers, read the history of the party, taste the red classics, and decipher the unknown historical details, just watch "Tao Ranji". can take the future road well only by not forgetting the road when it came.


Welcome to the WeChat public account [Tao Ranji] (ID: taoranji2022).


-- END --


Here is Xuran said (ID: xuranshuo). wrote about Mao Zedong's most concentrated, deep and interesting places on WeChat, and is committed to letting more young people understand Mao Zedong, learn from Mao Zedong, and realize the remodeling from three views to cognition.


If you want to read good articles with depth and insight, please pay attention: said Xu Ran.


here not only has a rigorous and realistic historical attitude, but also sharp and sharp current reviews. I will use the analysis of history, reality and people's behavior laws to help you predict the direction of things, see through the nature of the world, and even gain insight into the secrets of human nature.

Tags: news