With the improvement of the audience’s aesthetic level, the requirements for film and television productions are getting higher and higher. From what to watch in the past, to what to watch in the future, to what is good to see now, it is the audience as a whole The embodiment of improved level. This has to mention the word word of mouth. Although the overall aesthetic level has improved, differences in the audience’s cultural level, personal preferences, and aesthetic standards will still cause differences in the word of mouth of film and television works.
The same work, different people will have different evaluations. For example, the movie "Zhu Xian", which was hit by theaters some time ago, has been perfect in acting and plot in the eyes of fans, but passersby are lackluster in the eyes of the original fans. So where to find a fair and referable evaluation standard? Many people choose to score on Douban, which is also the most authoritative film review platform currently recognized. Of course, this "most authoritative" is also in comparison.
is more than nine points or more than Maoyan and Taopiao, and compared with the capital-controlled Weibo. Douban is indeed much fairer, but it is not without problems. In recent years, directors have constantly questioned their encounters and have been bad reviews. For example, in "Shanghai Fortress" some time ago, the film team questioned that it was badly reviewed, and it broke a news item with a bad review of 5 yuan. The film director of "Li Lei and Han Meimei" directly criticized Douban, claiming to have received a malicious bad review and also affected the box office. TV dramas often have this kind of situation. Guo Jingyu, the director of the TV drama "Mother Way", questioned Douban's bad reviews after bombarding the falsified ratings...
It seems that Douban has suffered a lot of doubts, and even many netizens mentioned it. Douban looks disgusting. Is this really the case? The so-called controversy, in fact, is still the disagreement of the scores by those people with different aesthetics, but the score of Douban reflects the evaluation of most people. It is an average data, and it is normal to have differences.
Some people say that Douban will be scored. This situation is unavoidable at home and abroad. However, Douban has a waterproof military mechanism, and abnormal scores will be excluded. The scores are calculated according to the average and there is no human intervention. In fact, comparing Douban's short reviews, film reviews, and percentages of bad reviews can also get a rough picture.
once said in the industry: “Scaling is of little significance, and it is basically a waste of money for us. Movies are a mass product. Once more people watch, the rating base will increase and the navy will be overwhelmed. The number of credits must be the number that has been kept for a long time, and it is always limited.”
Facts have proved that "Shanghai Fortress" does not need to be written to the extreme. The three views of "Mother's Way" are not correct and it is too bad. "Li Lei and Han Meimei" is still a bad film without Douban. Controversial works are often C-shaped works. The polarized reputation of these works also proves that there are problems in the works themselves. Generally speaking, these works have a score of 6 to 7, which is not bad. Some netizens said that
is correct. Douban scores may not be accurate, but those with a score of 4 or less are definitely bad movies, and those with a score of 8 or more are definitely not bad. According to this logic, you will find that Douban did not miss it. In fact, the key to whether a film and television drama work is good or not lies in yourself. You must refer to the score and you have the suspicion of cutting your feet and fitting your feet. But again, whether you like it or not is your right. If you want an objective evaluation of your work, Douban is still a good reference.
