"Galaxy Tutorial" premiered on Tencent yesterday, and many VIPs made up for the opportunity to go to the theater when they didn't have time. However, the evaluation after watching it was that many people said that they were fortunate not to go to the cinema, otherwise they would definitely feel that the movie ticket money was not worth the money, and even left the scene angrily.
So the editor turned over everyone's evaluation of this movie, and what I did not expect was almost all bad reviews. Not only the negative reviews are overwhelming, but also aroused a lot of people's anger. Because the subject matter is very special, not only did the story fail to tell well, it greatly misled the values. It seems that this movie made everyone angry. The bad review of
said on the whole that the name of this movie should be changed instead of "Galaxy Tutorial", but "Brainwashing Dad" is better. Because the whole movie is a pile of propaganda slogans, add a bit of sensationalism, and then boil a pot of idealistic chicken soup, stuck with the neck and pour it down. There is no practical proposal. The editor of
didn't want to read it as soon as he saw the beginning. A director who has worked hard on the script will never tolerate telling stories by character lines. The two died in an embarrassing period when the spacecraft had an accident in outer space. Telling the story in such a deliberately rigid dialogue made me feel uncomfortable. After reading it, I very much agree with everyone's views. The entire movie network was spread too much, and the landing was not true. There is no slogan, too little action. Let’s take a look at the theme first, what is the difference in this movie.
1. Logic error
This is the major premise leading to the deviation of the whole theme. The logical error is manifested in Ma Haowen’s so-called educational philosophy. The purpose of resisting exam-oriented education is not for breakthrough, but for compliance. Just like not eating grapes and saying grape sour, the reason I resist you is because you don't want me. If you want me, then I will never resist you.
If Ma Haowen did not make a bet to stay in school at the beginning, but cultivated his son in his own way, and eventually became an astronaut, this would be more convincing. The school may also reflect on it. Oh, it turns out that a bad student can live like this after leaving the school.
But all Ma Haowen did was to get the children back to school. In other words, it is to integrate into test-oriented education in a way of liberating thinking. Isn’t it a bad essay, let’s take a look at life; don’t you think there is too much homework? Okay, we can always do 0.1cm a day; isn’t it unwilling to go to class? Then father set an example and work late at night will affect you subtly. So watching this movie from the beginning to the end, although it releases the child's nature with a very romantic attitude, the final goal is to return to the top ten of the exam.
This is not a resistance to exam-oriented education, but a more humane program for exam-oriented education. He is extremely rebellious on the surface, but in actual behavior he manages to get in. And this is in contradiction with the drawbacks of exam-oriented education that he keeps steaming buns.
2. The combination of extreme individualism and elitism
Looking at the film as a whole, it is not difficult to find that Ma Haowen is extremely individualistic. He denied examination-oriented education with a completely closed and arrogant attitude. It is believed that exam-oriented education will only create learning machines and will not make children a real person. This is a seriously distorted understanding of the corresponding trial education. He is too individualistic. He takes it for granted that a child does not learn well. My child does not learn well because you did not develop his potential. It is because Qian Lima did not meet Bole, and it is you who have the problem, not my son. not good.
And the worst choice is that his son's grades are not good. The first thing he thinks about is to find other people's fault (the repression of the child by examination-oriented education), not his son's playfulness and laziness, and he did not let his son reflect on himself. In any kind of education, a child’s personality must be ascertained, whether he is 7 points good to learn, 3 points lazy, or 3 points good to learn, 7 points lazy. The principle of teaching students in accordance with their aptitude is based on the character of good students to consider the direction of development. Let a kid who is studious to release his nature, he will still make a difference; if a child who is lazy is allowed to release his nature, he will definitely eat and wait to die. The movie
is not suitable. What he conveys is to let all children play their nature without combining the children themselves. Therefore, this kind of educational philosophy of releasing nature is based on the elite consciousness of children.
Ma Fei did not perform well, but he loves aerospace and hopes to practice it (see the Aerospace Exhibition). He is slack in his homework, but has a strong willpower in interest. So it can be seen that this child is born not suitable for learning, suitable for interests.
but the realityHowever, not all children can be so savvy, so conscious, a few words of chicken soup and a few outings can strengthen their interest. Especially for children who love to play games, if he is allowed to study games, he may become a professional master, but in most cases he will spend all day in Internet cafes. This is a fact.
And this liberating nature of education is based on the right to be granted only when it is recognized and belongs to the test-oriented education system. It is how many candidates your child must pass in order to choose. So before Ma Fei became an astronaut, he became the number one in the school. This affirms the elitism of this educational philosophy.
So let’s see, this kind of educational philosophy that releases nature must be that your child has enough specific interest and strong willpower for interest. In reality, the probability is very small. So it's an example, it doesn't have universal significance, nor does it have promotion significance.
Therefore, the educational concept promoted by this movie is just a beautiful fairy tale. The feasibility and success rate are very small. It lacks authenticity, so it gives you chicken soup to make you mistake it for authenticity. This is why the film's slogan is so serious. The above
is just a personal opinion, you are free to comment and ask for advice humbly.
