movie is about a tragedy between two families of four. The poor family living in a dark and cramped semi-basement, relying on their rich social experience and livelihood skills, tried every means to parasitize the upper-class society at any cost, and in front of them, the other family seemed "very Stupid is naive.” Although living in a spacious and bright mansion and living a rich and prosperous life, he was played in the palm of his hand because of his simplicity and lack of scheming, which eventually caused bad luck.
Secondly, the two most important conflicts in the movie are the conflicts between the families of the two nannys. The second conflict is the escalation of the birthday party based on this conflict. The last one is the difference between the president’s repeated presentation of taste, but The biggest climax in these three movies is logically contradictory. First of all, the family of the two babysitters can be avoided as the answer said. It is not impossible to live together. The husband of the former babysitter must be in the basement. This is a rigid condition. I don’t. I think the former nanny really dared to send the video to the Pu family.
Once the former nanny compromises, the Jin family will definitely not report it. The two families have mutual control and the Jin family will give up a job. I don't think there is anything unacceptable. The choice of the last two is also really helpless. It abruptly avoided this possibility completely, leading to the worst ending and also leading to the final conflict, which can really be completely avoided. Originally, when the two babysitters clash for the first time in the movie, I thought the next step was to enter the stage where the two had mutual control to negotiate. This is common sense, but the director just turned the camera bluntly and became the former babysitter. Triumphantly yelled for the nanny family like a comedy movie.
not only ignores the logic flaws, but also blatantly fools the audience, and easily takes all unreasonable places with the method of comedy movies. For example, the whole family at the beginning easily replaces the original staff, etc., so it is also boasted and thought-provoking I'm afraid it's all just following the trend. The director has a framework, a few good lines, and a few real fragments. He puts these together to make up a false story. Although some movies will be regrettable after watching, they will feel that True, and this one is fortunately only two hours, otherwise the length of the length will be more flawed, and the director is too lazy to optimize the details in the only space.
has no effect except intensifying the ambiguity of class contradictions. This kind of deliberately flattering film that makes people feel unreal is really seriously overrated and very average. At the end of the movie, a letter from my brother, can he buy that villa through hard work? So that his father can see the sun again. In my opinion it is just an illusion. Is it possible to break through the class through hard work? South Korea is a capitalist country. Wealth is in the hands of a small number of large family companies. It will either become a parasite to the rich and work for the rich, or stay at the bottom, solve food and clothing, or create a business. But It is inevitable to be exploited by the upper level and eventually become a proletarian. In the
movie, all the family members are capable but live so humble, even though they feel like ordinary lower-level characters in the first half, they exhaust their minds after meeting the rich. The characters are very clear, although The final ending is hard to say, but the more you look at it, the more powerful it becomes. It is worth recommending
