As the movie "Parasite" defeated many strong opponents in Palme d'Or in May, the popularity gradually fermented on the Internet. Although it cannot be released in China, there is a lot of discussion about it. The discussion on "Parasite" on
mainly revolves around several aspects such as "stone", "plan", and "smell". I have also posted relevant interpretations on these images, so I won't repeat them here. Those who are interested can do so. Look at the previous article.
In addition, there are many voices saying: "The rich are the most injustices, and they are not guilty of death."
So, should the rich die? Let's talk about this issue today.
The concept of equality of life
What is the difference between the poor and the rich?
In addition to the amount of material, they are all equal people. Both the poor and the rich have the right to live on the earth. This equality does not deviate according to the amount of material. There is a detail in the
movie: When Mr. Park and Mrs. Park are doing what they love on the sofa in the living room, Mr. Park asks Mrs. Park to play the "unknown woman" wearing cheap underwear because it will make him more excited.
Therefore, many film critics think that this is an expression of abuse by the rich to the poor.
But I think this kind of analysis is quite ridiculous. If according to this logic: playing a poor woman is a kind of abuse, then if the wife wears a uniform to act as a stewardess or nurse, is it also a kind of abuse? The role-playing of
was originally a little fun between husband and wife, and there is nothing to criticize.
Therefore, I think that this plot may be interpreted as: "The rich and the poor have the same essence, and both are equal people, have the same desires, and also experience birth"
ends in the movie, three families , All people die, which may also reflect the concept of equality of life.
The competition in reality is always cruel
Although everyone is mortal in the end, it is impossible for everyone to die in reality after all.
When two poor families competed for the right to stay in a rich family, the nanny Wenguang was kicked down the stairs by Jin's mother, and finally died of a concussion. And Wenguang's husband died at the hands of Jin Ma while seeking revenge.
The death of Wu Qinshi and Wen Guang also highlights the cruelty of competition: life has never been so easy. In the cruel reality, it is impossible to get a better life without smooth sailing. In the competition, some people will be beaten and some Will be eliminated by society.
The instigator
finally talks about the deaths of sister Ji Ting and Mr. Park.
If real legal reasoning is used to determine who deserves to die and who should not die in the movie, then neither Ji Ting nor Mr. Park deserve to die.
In the Jin family, it is Kim Dad and Kim Mom who have blood on their hands, but it is the younger sister Ji Ting who died; and Mr. Park seems even more wronged. Although he believes he is superior, it is not only that the crime does not die. Not even going to be detained.
Then why are Kim Dad and Kim Mom okay, but Ji Ting and Mr. Park will receive the lunch?
Discussing this issue, we can’t measure it with the real law. After all, "Parasite" is not a law-promoting film, so we need to escape the "sin" defined by the law and look at the "original sin" of sister Ji Ting and Mr. Park. ".
Regarding the image of our sister Ji Ting, we need to pay special attention to one detail, that is, when the family called the Park’s family and moved into the mansion, Kim Dad and Ji Woo were sorry for driving away the original driver.
But Ji Ting interrupted them without any guilt for her selfish behavior. What
Ji Ting represents is a kind of "unscrupulous concept for oneself"
It is conceivable that if everyone can use any means for their own benefit, what the world will be like. And director Feng Junhao is also using Ji Ting's death to express: This concept must be eliminated in human society.
and Mr. Park stands for "the concept of class consolidation." Although the smell in the
movie was first brought up by the younger son Dasong, it is Mr. Park's discussion of "the smell in the subway" that really gives it the meaning.
The so-called class consolidation is not a tangible wall, but a wall built by the rich in themselves and other strugglers.
In reality, it is almost impossible to completely eliminate the gap between the rich and the poor, but if every struggler succeeds, he canThe working people at the bottom have respect, so hasn't the so-called stratum consolidation disappeared into the invisible?
