Today, I will introduce you a movie-"Creed". The film is logically deduced based on the main axis of determinism. If it is not established according to quantum theory, good science fiction films should be like this. Like a debate, the argument can be established. Nolan’s films always make people think. He is awesome. It is possible to convey what philosophy wants to express in a film that is easy to understand to make us think that the world is the same world. In the film, the characters are not time and space. The heroine goes back to the past and then enters the machine again. Isn’t that what the male protagonist in Freeport does? And before the decisive battle, Nolan deliberately filmed the scene where the heroine was going from the reverse direction to the machine to turn to the normal.
Secondly, let's talk about the plot. Originally, when you enter the machine once, you are inverse, and then the inverse enters the machine again and it becomes straight, right. The only difference is the difference in time. In theory, it is possible to create countless selves and only need to enter the machine countless times, but in fact, the real needs only require three selves, namely, the present, the past and the future. Is very skilled. But the surveillance video didn't say it very thoroughly, and I still didn't understand it based on this penetration, and the Indian arms dealer, why did the old woman kill the heroine in the end. Surveillance video is because having surveillance video is equivalent to having a medium to send information to the future, so that the future male protagonist can save the female protagonist in reverse time; the Indian arms dealer is also a member of TENET, because the female protagonist knows too much and She is not from TENET so she is going to kill her.
In addition, what I didn’t understand was why I didn’t need to wear a mask when I crossed back. The heroine of Zhengshikong returned to the past and killed her husband who killed Zhengshikong. Or does it mean that anti-space-time is anti-space-time, and the past is the past? It is still said that people who are in time and space travel to the past (inverse time and space) are walking backwards! Also, I think there will be Neil in the future, because "the me in the past" is what the future Neil said, that is to say, Neil, who is positive at this time, has not met the male protagonist at this time, and the male protagonist will be recruited in the future. He, he went back to the past and the savior.
Finally, there is one thing I didn’t understand. Finally, the host and the hostess went back to the past in reverse time. The cargo ship was retrograde. They were all in the isolation room on the cargo ship without oxygen masks. This is easy to understand. The heroine didn't wear a mask when she went to the yacht to look for Lao Russia, and the hero didn't wear a mask when she participated in the red team assault. The time was not retrograde. That's why. In reverse time, the so-called "the male protagonist threw the plutonium into the silver car" is actually the male protagonist took the plutonium from the silver car, received it in his box, and continued the deduction in reverse time. The plutonium should be climbed to the fire by the male protagonist. In the car, drill from the hole into the escort vehicle, and put it back into the escort vehicle. This is the process of going backwards in time. In this process, the Russians did not steal the plutonium at all, otherwise it would conflict with the previous fait accompli. At this point, the film did not explain clearly how the Russians stole the plutonium.
Special statement: The above content (including pictures or videos if included) is uploaded and published by users of the self-media platform "number". This platform only provides information storage services.
