Hong Kong’s legislative amendments have ended, but the opposition claims to continue to fight. What are they going to do?

Chief Executive Carrie Lam proposed four actions to stabilize the situation in Hong Kong on Wednesday, and held a press conference on Thursday to fully release the goodwill, express the determination to lead the SAR government and the people out of the predicament, and also introduced corresponding measures. However, the opposition claimed that the actions of the chief executive and the SAR government came too late and too little, declaring that "the five major demands are indispensable" and that they will "continue to fight." U.S. House of Representatives Speaker Pelosi, Senator Rubio, etc. also echoed the voices of the Hong Kong opposition, and also stated that the SAR government has not done enough and asked to accept all the demands of the demonstrators.

Lao Hu couldn't help asking: The amendment to the regulations has come to an end. What exactly are the Hong Kong opposition doing? Where do they want to push Hong Kong? The color revolution in the

world began with a specific controversy at the beginning, and then the state of affairs completely deviated from the original point and moved towards extreme political subversion. How far does the Hong Kong opposition intend to copy such a script? Do they know that it is definitely not a "revolution" that can be accomplished by chewing gum and throwing a few Molotov cocktails.

Lao Hu wanted to tell them that, first, as the chief executive and the SAR government clearly and unmistakably demonstrated more and more goodwill and continued communication with the people, the opposition’s mobilization of extreme demonstrations will become more and more laborious. Their supporters will shrink.

Second, Hong Kong is not a country, but a special administrative region of the People’s Republic of China. Hong Kong’s street politics cannot ultimately have the same ending as the color revolutions in other places. The country has full constitutional rights and power to prevent such endings. I believe most people in Hong Kong have the emotional intelligence to understand this. If the opposition refuses to accept this A basic reality is that it must be copied in Hong Kong where there are no conditions to play the script, then they are hitting the rocks with pebbles.

Third, Hong Kong is at a critical point in whether to return to order. US Congressmen Pelosi, Rubio, and others have all spoken, and they are basically in the same tone with the Hong Kong opposition, reflecting that these people in Washington do not want Hong Kong to appear to be stable. Any signs. The collective emotional intelligence of Hong Kong society is too important. Don't be a new pawn on the front line of the United States to contain China, and don't be kidnapped by a few extreme opposition groups. Tao Jie admitted in the dialogue with Lao Hu that there are thousands to 10,000 people in Hong Kong who are the least accepting to stabilize. Hong Kong’s fate cannot be hijacked by these thousands to 10,000 people.