"Golden Eyes" and the novel are so different? The golden pupil will go back! The audience said the adaptation was fine

news 2667℃

"Golden Eyes" is an adaptation of the novel of the same name, but the plot is very different from the original novel. Many plots have changed. For example, Qin Xuanbing, who was supposed to be the original wife, became the villain. After the adaptation of

by the screenwriter, many people can no longer see the direction of the plot. I don't know what the final ending will be. It retains the mystery of the plot. However, some people think that the screenwriter does not respect the meaning of the original novel in this way.

'Golden Eyes' and the novel are so different? The golden pupil will go back! The audience said the adaptation was fine - Lujuba

However, not everyone thinks so. In the original novel, the protagonist used the golden pupil to successfully earn a lot of wealth and became a well-known expert in treasures. Even in the later period, his eyes You can also use antiquities to collect aura and make yourself stronger.

'Golden Eyes' and the novel are so different? The golden pupil will go back! The audience said the adaptation was fine - Lujuba

There is nothing wrong with these settings in the novel, and there is nothing wrong with them, but if they are placed in the film and television drama, they are a little too illusory, and they are not suitable for adaptation, and the positive energy values ​​transmitted are relatively few, so The screenwriter is suitable for adapting this part to be eliminated. After

'Golden Eyes' and the novel are so different? The golden pupil will go back! The audience said the adaptation was fine - Lujuba

was removed, the screenwriter said that the protagonist’s eyes not only did not help him become stronger, but also had a great negative impact on him. In the play, the protagonist used this plug-in function many times. And there were various situations such as amnesia, blindness, etc., which meant that he had begun to suffer backlash.

People who have read the original novel said that they didn’t like this setting. They looked uncomfortable, and the changes to the original novel were too great. However, some people said that this is actually very reasonable. Help people without harming them. Where can there be such good things in the world? As the saying goes: good fortune and evil, the two are dependent on each other.

'Golden Eyes' and the novel are so different? The golden pupil will go back! The audience said the adaptation was fine - Lujuba

There is no good thing in vain. I don’t want to pay a price and I want to get the benefits. This kind of value thinking is originally negative. It’s not good. It’s impossible to shoot like this in film and television dramas. So many viewers agree with this change, saying that there is nothing wrong with the adaptation, and they also like this adaptation very much. This adaptation of

'Golden Eyes' and the novel are so different? The golden pupil will go back! The audience said the adaptation was fine - Lujuba

also has a basis. Feng Quan, who has appeared many times in the play, believes that everyone is not very unfamiliar. He is from Pu Songling's pen. At the beginning, a turtle spirit gave him the ability to see all the treasures in the world. But he also told him that this would deplete people's menstrual blood and damage people's lifespan. Isn't the protagonist's backlash that way? Although

said that the adaptation of the screenwriter is a bit strong, the adaptations are all justified and well-founded, which makes this treasure have pros and cons and conveys more valuable educational ideas.

Tags: news