The director, please take the lead: Facing Douban with a score of 9.6 and 4.5, he is too dare to say, but not quite right

movie 1017℃

In the "Actors Please Get In", updated on November 29th, directors compete in pairs. Was I watching "Director please come up" before me? They are all very good, let me understand the addition and subtraction, so I analyzed that this variety show is actually a "director please come up" in the jacket of an actor. In this episode of the program, Guo Jingming made sharp comments and successfully grabbed the spotlight and appeared on the hot search, which once again proved my point.

The director, please take the lead: Facing Douban with a score of 9.6 and 4.5, he is too dare to say, but not quite right - Lujuba

is just Guo Jingming too dare to say?

Chen Kaige, who made "Farewell My Concubine" with Douban 9.6 points, was positively criticized by Guo Jingming, the director of Douban "Little Times 3" with a score of 4.5 points. Such a strong smell of gunpowder, whether or not the program team played to save the heat of cooling To strengthen the heart, we only need to have some melons to eat and play. If I can take something along the way, this kind of drama is not much better, as long as I think it is particularly good. The highlight of

is not only Guo Jingming's boldness, but also Chen Kaige's work, which brought us a unique movie viewing class.

The director, please take the lead: Facing Douban with a score of 9.6 and 4.5, he is too dare to say, but not quite right - Lujuba

Guo Jingming and Zhao Wei have commented on "I Want to Have a Home" written and directed by Chen Kaige this time. They all pointed to the script itself, or Chen Kaige. It's just that Guo Jingming uses more direct, pedantic, and more eye-catching language.

Zhao Wei finally said:

"I think this is also a style."

Many people, like Guo Jingming, think that Ms. Wei is too gentle and dare not say it to save face. Actually not, this is where Zhao Wei is better. Where is the best, in the following.

And how to see the quality of a script? Just look at the three keywords in Guo Jingming's words: theme, motivation, arc .

The director, please take the lead: Facing Douban with a score of 9.6 and 4.5, he is too dare to say, but not quite right - Lujuba

Guo Jingming sharply commented on

vulgar, refined, and good

subject matter determines the benchmark for examining works. performances are diversified, and the subject matter largely determines the way actors perform.

Zhao Wei's comments on Bao Wenjing, Liu Yase and E Jingwen's performances in the show just cover the three mainstream performance methods.

Bao Wenjing is a very lifelike vulgar, Liu Yase is emotional and refined, E Jingwen is advanced and restrained, and has the advantages of the first two, but the actors need to be appropriately balanced according to the role. The director will choose suitable actors according to the theme of the script.

Bao Wenjing, "A World Without Thieves"

is a hot costume fantasy drama, because it cannot be verified and the public has no personal experience, it is necessary to realize empathy in emotion. Li Shaohong's Douban 9-point drama "Daming Palace Ci" is a model. The lines in the play will not appear in life, but it is this kind of Shakespearean exaggeration that always makes people feel uncontrollable. Refinement has always been Li Shaohong's masterpiece, and she also wants to be challenged, so she really likes Bao Wenjing to express life in "A World Without Thieves".

Zhou Xun, "Daming Palace Ci"

This time Chen Kaige's "I Want to Have a Home" is what he said reflects reality. It needs to be close to reality, that is, vulgarity, in details (serving the Tao), plot and performance, in order to be contagious and arouse empathy. The 18-year dark horse "The Unknown" and the just-released "Sherlock on the Plain" are examples.

Vulgar is never just derogatory, but Vulgar can also be close to life and higher than life. In the face of art, it is more difficult and more advanced to appreciate both the refined and the popular than the high and the few. It is often easy to change from the vulgar to the elegant, and from the elegant to the vulgar. Guo Jingming believes that the subject of

​​should be interpreted in an extremely life-like manner, but the latter part is too idealistic. Indeed there will be, how can the latter part be an awkward word.

But Guo Jingming is too absolute. Chen Kaige, a great director who was born in a science class and has always been a good fit, didn't know this basic theory of film. It's just that what he wants is a higher level of appreciation for the elegance and commonness, but in the end he used too much force, too close to being vulgar. On the contrary, it is not credible and naturally cannot arouse empathy. Liu Yase plays a dying person, with strong emotions, naturally refined and reasonable.

Zhao Wei saw Chen Kaige's thoughts clearly, and also knew that the elegance and the common appreciation were high-level, and then he came up with that style.

Zhao Wei's insightful comments

To be honest, this is not a surprise, because this time the script was written by Chen Kaige himself. After seeing Chen Kaige's recent movies, you can see some clues and the market's reaction.Ying also illustrates this point. In terms of vulgarity, Director Chen still needs to be improved.

In recent years, Chen Kaige has been questioned, and some people still think that "Farewell My Concubine" is his father's work. But I don't think he can't do it, just don't want to. Because pure art films have become a routine for him, and it's boring. He wants to challenge different artistic pursuits, but he is still exploring.

is very similar to Li Ang in this point. In the interpretation of human nature, Li Ang has come a long way, at least he thinks it is far enough, so let's do it. Therefore, he wanted to pursue a breakthrough in film technology, and only then did the "Gemini Killer" hit the street. He and Chen Kaige can be described as peers.

The art of loneliness in public

Motivation is the element of the script logic, and it is also the root of the actor's performance. Guo Jingming bluntly does not trust the motives of every character, and is suspected of exaggeration, but there is indeed a problem with the motive of this script, which is corroborated in side shots and interviews.

Weiwei is a new generation actor with more ideas and foundation. But after she got the script, she was still unable to enter the role. As a woman, she could not understand Chen Kaige's preference for soft rice men from the perspective of straight men.

Chen Kaige also knows that Weiwei is difficult to enter the show.

Guo Jingming asked Liu Yase before, what is the most important thing for an actor? Liu Yase said that the actor must believe in his role and make the audience believe. Guo Jingming's subsequent judgment from the perspective of the director is open to question, and the director and actors are no exception. That's why Zhao Wei praised the actors in it, and the representativeness of Liu Yase's answer need not be said.

Shi Hang said in the next door "The Peak Showdown" that actors are the art of loneliness in public. In order for to enter the role, they have to separate themselves from the real world. Then they are absolutely confident, first of all, at least under the camera. And this all depends on the role motives set by the script.

"Bookworm", "Film Critic", "Parrot" Shi Hang

are not self-confident, how can the audience believe it? Weiwei, who has made mistakes several times, shows that she has not been able to enter the role from start to finish. Although she also tried very hard to convince herself to enter the play, she tried to interact with Aaron Yan with Sweet Smile, but faced Aaron Yan who was also offline. To no avail. Li Shaohong teased that Aaron Yan had never been in a relationship, but was actually a tactful criticism of the unsynchronized relationship between the two. After the failed interaction of

, Weiwei's broken smile

knocked down Voldemort's wand

arc is the highlight moment of the conflict and conflict in the script, the determinant of the height of the theme, and the wand of empathy for the characters.

Guo Jingming believes that every character must not be the same person when it comes to the end. Therefore, the house-buying girl in the work must buy a house for love or not, and Ma Bao-nan must be moved and independent. He was still too eloquent, he just didn't approve of the character arcs buried by Chen Kaige. But human nature is complex, with thousands of faces, existence is reasonable, and this is the beauty of human nature.

on what is noncommittal micro-expression

, but his importance to arc is still worthy of recognition. Take "The Nameless", which is also a realistic theme, as an example. The reason why it moved people and became a dark horse in blockbusters such as "Venom" is just because its characters are full of arcs.

When Hu Guangsheng and Ma Jiaqi met, he took off the disguise of a "tough bandit" and became a solid and confident "eye". She walked out of the haze of the hut, felt the rain, and looked forward to living. Ma Xianyong stepped out of his guilt, accepted his downfall, and cherished the love of his family; he put aside his low self-esteem, and became a fairy tale of beauty and the beast. Realistic movies are the faces of all beings, and the arc of the characters is the center of contradiction and the sustenance of the audience's emotions.

The self-salvation of "Hunters" and "Hunters"

A sage soldier invited for fifty thousand?

Guo Jingming's conclusion on Ming Dao Tianxiang Shenbing should be the rat shit of his remarks. The real contradiction of

, more than one million house payments, was resolved when Niu Junfeng broke out. This is the reason for the script. The creditor Yang Di agreed that the extension could be extended. Why did he become the boss Voldemort with the mere 50,000 balance? The emergence of Ming Dao is only Chen Kaige's response to the theme of goodness in the last issue of "The Four Blind", which is to please old audiences, and it is harmless.

The gods fight, the actors are confused

It is undeniable that Guo Jingming is really hard at directing , his theoretical research is worthy of recognition, although too academic; His practice needs to be improved, but he must be a person who knows how to appreciate movies. Just like, people who can read books may not be able to write good books. There are few good teachers among scientists. Guo Jingming's movies do not conflict with his appreciation level.

And Chen Kaige's work this time does not even need to discuss too much theory, the most intuitive viewing experience determines its level. Compared with "Four Blind Men", his works in this issue are really a bit unbearable. Although his last self-defense did not lose the demeanor of everyone, he also saw that he was inevitably immersed in the creator's narcissism. He could persuade himself, but still could not convince Weiwei.

"Ultimate" in the program group

This is the reason why I am in love with ""Director please be in place"" in the three-stage actor competition variety show. It is entertaining and entertaining. He has enough information and more worthy of thinking and learning. The place. Of course, these are just the scraps in the movie, there is no way to get started, and the road is long. This debate of

should not stop at entertainment’s curiosity and carnival, nor is it just a slap in the face of the polite and hypocritical entertainment circle, but more importantly, remind us to remember that entertainment is supreme today, we need to look at everything on the screen dialectically , Don’t blindly worship authority, such as Chen Kaige, and don’t be trapped by traffic, such as Guo Jingming. To borrow Chen Kaige's last words, we must accept other voices in life.

borrows the slogan of the villain: if

is not free to criticize, praise is meaningless. The party fights against differences, fierce fire! Dear

, if you like it, click a favorite, welcome to leave a message and exchange!

Tags: movie