On October 30, the movie " wild child " was launched on all major legitimate video platforms. This movie stars actors such as Wang Junkai and Guan Zixie. It tells the story of a group of wild children who have children but no one to raise them. The subject matter of this "wild child" itself has value, especially on a sociological level. However, the blunt narrative of the movie "Wild Child" caused this value to be severely compromised. Of course, what is more serious than the blunt story is Wang Junkai's performance. His acting skills in the film are even inferior to the young actor Guan Zixie.
Let me start by saying that the story is blunt. The movie "Wild Child" focuses its narrative on showing Wang Junkai's character and Guan Zixie's character making a living in the city, especially on the edge of crime. This kind of display certainly has a certain value. However, for movie fans, one question that may arise is: Why don’t our social welfare institutions adopt these children? Obviously, all the survival displays of wild children in the film are just to make fans ask this sentence.
However, at the end of the film, when this problem was faced head-on, logical flaws began to appear. In the video, the staff of the welfare agency told the Deng Jiajia character that these children have parents and their grandfather is still alive, so they do not meet the standards of orphans at all. At this point, this TV series has actually fallen into a very thought-worthy story. Are the wild children in the film considered orphans? If not, then which link did the problem occur? After this problem occurs, how to solve it?
All movie fans are looking forward to the answer to "how to break the situation". However, the movie "Wild Child" has serious narrative logic confusion in this narrative. Deng Jiajia's character somehow solved the enrollment problem of Guan Zixie's character, and somehow allowed the child to live in school and enjoy welfare benefits. The film proposes "paradox" content and finally gives a happy ending, but it does not answer how to achieve the "paradox" breakthrough. Obviously, this is the biggest flaw of "Wild Child".
If this flaw is not solved, the entire story structure of "Wild Child" will be worthless, and it will become a sad thing to compose new words. Of course, what's more serious than the bluntness of the story is the bluntness of young actor Wang Junkai's performance. Young popular stars are afraid that film critics will say their performances are stiff. Their fans also don't want to hear such words, and even want to besiege them. I suggest that all fans should not be anxious and think carefully about whether Wang Junkai is qualified for the performance task assigned to him by the script in this "Wild Child"?
So, what is the acting task assigned to Wang Junkai in the script? I feel that it should be a three-stage task. The first stage is when Wang Junkai's character fights alone. The task of the script is to let the actor present the mental and living conditions of a child who grew up "wild". The second stage is the emotional change between the older child and the younger child after Wang Junkai's character and Guan Zixie's character merge. The third stage is about the psychological changes of Guan Zixie's character after he entered school and Wang Junkai's character was arrested.
It can be said that in "Wild Child", Wang Junkai failed to complete the script tasks in these three stages. In the first stage, you might as well click on the movie and watch the opening. Can you tell what Wang Junkai's character does? This is the most intuitive way of evaluation. A young man who has been a wild child since childhood, should his mental state be like that in Wang Junkai's performance? I believe that any fan who has seen Wild Child will not recognize Wang Junkai's performance.
In contrast, the young actor Guan Zixie's performance as a wild child is more convincing. This little actor's performance once made me wonder, this kid was born a wild child, right? After watching "Wild Child", I quickly checked and looked at the information. This young actor was clean and definitely not a wild child.However, his talent in acting as a wild child is really much better than that of Wang Junkai.
In the second stage of the script task, can fans see the emotional changes of Wang Junkai's character towards Guan Zixie's character at different stages? Sorry, I can't see it. After the two characters merged, my feeling is that Wang Junkai has always adhered to the principle of zero emotion during his performance, and no emotional changes can be seen at all.
By the third stage, the little wild child has already gone to school. After Wang Junkai's character was arrested, he was still emotionless. Fans could not tell what the character's emotions were when he was arrested. Actors, on the surface, perform the emotions of the characters. Through this performance, the fans can feel the emotions of the characters. However, Wang Junkai's zero-emotional performance made the entire character boring.
Movies like "Wild Child" give actors enough space to perform. However, Wang Junkai did not cherish this performance space. This is a great pity. Always acting like this, the data flow can’t sustain the consumption.
On October 30, the movie " wild child " was launched on all major legitimate video platforms. This movie stars actors such as Wang Junkai and Guan Zixie. It tells the story of a group of wild children who have children but no one to raise them. The subject matter of this "wild child" itself has value, especially on a sociological level. However, the blunt narrative of the movie "Wild Child" caused this value to be severely compromised. Of course, what is more serious than the blunt story is Wang Junkai's performance. His acting skills in the film are even inferior to the young actor Guan Zixie.
Let me start by saying that the story is blunt. The movie "Wild Child" focuses its narrative on showing Wang Junkai's character and Guan Zixie's character making a living in the city, especially on the edge of crime. This kind of display certainly has a certain value. However, for movie fans, one question that may arise is: Why don’t our social welfare institutions adopt these children? Obviously, all the survival displays of wild children in the film are just to make fans ask this sentence.
However, at the end of the film, when this problem was faced head-on, logical flaws began to appear. In the video, the staff of the welfare agency told the Deng Jiajia character that these children have parents and their grandfather is still alive, so they do not meet the standards of orphans at all. At this point, this TV series has actually fallen into a very thought-worthy story. Are the wild children in the film considered orphans? If not, then which link did the problem occur? After this problem occurs, how to solve it?
All movie fans are looking forward to the answer to "how to break the situation". However, the movie "Wild Child" has serious narrative logic confusion in this narrative. Deng Jiajia's character somehow solved the enrollment problem of Guan Zixie's character, and somehow allowed the child to live in school and enjoy welfare benefits. The film proposes "paradox" content and finally gives a happy ending, but it does not answer how to achieve the "paradox" breakthrough. Obviously, this is the biggest flaw of "Wild Child".
If this flaw is not solved, the entire story structure of "Wild Child" will be worthless, and it will become a sad thing to compose new words. Of course, what's more serious than the bluntness of the story is the bluntness of young actor Wang Junkai's performance. Young popular stars are afraid that film critics will say their performances are stiff. Their fans also don't want to hear such words, and even want to besiege them. I suggest that all fans should not be anxious and think carefully about whether Wang Junkai is qualified for the performance task assigned to him by the script in this "Wild Child"?
So, what is the acting task assigned to Wang Junkai in the script? I feel that it should be a three-stage task. The first stage is when Wang Junkai's character fights alone. The task of the script is to let the actor present the mental and living conditions of a child who grew up "wild". The second stage is the emotional change between the older child and the younger child after Wang Junkai's character and Guan Zixie's character merge. The third stage is about the psychological changes of Guan Zixie's character after he entered school and Wang Junkai's character was arrested.
It can be said that in "Wild Child", Wang Junkai failed to complete the script tasks in these three stages. In the first stage, you might as well click on the movie and watch the opening. Can you tell what Wang Junkai's character does? This is the most intuitive way of evaluation. A young man who has been a wild child since childhood, should his mental state be like that in Wang Junkai's performance? I believe that any fan who has seen Wild Child will not recognize Wang Junkai's performance.
In contrast, the young actor Guan Zixie's performance as a wild child is more convincing. This little actor's performance once made me wonder, this kid was born a wild child, right? After watching "Wild Child", I quickly checked and looked at the information. This young actor was clean and definitely not a wild child.However, his talent in acting as a wild child is really much better than that of Wang Junkai.
In the second stage of the script task, can fans see the emotional changes of Wang Junkai's character towards Guan Zixie's character at different stages? Sorry, I can't see it. After the two characters merged, my feeling is that Wang Junkai has always adhered to the principle of zero emotion during his performance, and no emotional changes can be seen at all.
By the third stage, the little wild child has already gone to school. After Wang Junkai's character was arrested, he was still emotionless. Fans could not tell what the character's emotions were when he was arrested. Actors, on the surface, perform the emotions of the characters. Through this performance, the fans can feel the emotions of the characters. However, Wang Junkai's zero-emotional performance made the entire character boring.
Movies like "Wild Child" give actors enough space to perform. However, Wang Junkai did not cherish this performance space. This is a great pity. Always acting like this, the data flow can’t sustain the consumption.(Text/Ma Qingyun)