Recently, many netizens are paying attention to the topic of the live broadcast circle. I believe you have seen a lot of content in this regard. During this period, one thing has aroused a lot of heated discussion among netizens, and that is the relationship between two top ancho

Recently, many netizens are paying attention to the topic of the live broadcast circle. I believe you have seen a lot of content in this regard. During this period, one thing has aroused a lot of heated discussion among netizens, and that is the relationship between the two top anchors. Conflicts arise between them.

That was the topic between Simba and the Three Sheeps. Originally, the cause was a very small thing, that is, they sold the same brand of products. Overall, Simba’s price was a little more expensive, and then he was besieged by netizens. .

Simba directly sprayed Three Sheep, and Three Sheep also responded strongly, which eventually led to the escalation of the conflict. Then Simba came up with a set of combination punches, first exposing the criminal evidence of the founder of Three Sheep, and then exposing the foam. Mo's imprisonment.

then brought up the matter of braised pork with pickled vegetables again, and even paid 100 million yuan to compensate the fans of Three Sheeps. However, in the end, the subrogated compensation was suspected of being illegal, and the account was eventually banned by the platform. It has not been unblocked yet.

Now that this matter has developed, many people think that it will pass soon, but it is not that simple. We have seen that the Three Sheep incident has attracted official attention. Recently, the People's Daily has come out and bluntly stated that the anchor lacks restraint.

Although the People’s Daily did not mention Three Sheep or Little Yang in the whole article, it reflected the shadow of Little Yang in many places. For example, the quality of the goods was overturned, and the anchors of big goods were not affected at all, and even ignored him regardless of the matter. , obviously unreasonable.

Also: the lack of effective restraints on anchors carrying goods is not conducive to protecting the rights and interests of consumers, nor is it conducive to the long-term healthy development of the industry. This is already a very polite attitude. Obviously, they are still given a chance. It depends on whether they can wake up in time.What do you want to say about this?