The controversy over male star Yu Shi's private life sparked by actress Zhang Yuqi has not yet come to an end. Just one day after Yu Shi Studio issued a statement, CCTV4, which deleted the promotion of Yu Shi Mid-Autumn Festival Gala, made a new move. The official blog annou

The controversy over actor Yu Shi’s private life that was sparked by actress Zhang Yuqi has not yet come to an end.

Just one day after Yu Shi Studio issued a statement, cctv4, which deleted the promotion of Yu Shi Mid-Autumn Festival Gala, made a new move. The official blog announced the lineup of the party in alphabetical order by the stars' surnames. There were more than 30 participating stars, but Yu Shi was not seen. Originally, Actress Zhou Yiran, who was scheduled to sing on stage at the Mid-Autumn Festival Gala with him, was also deleted.

Judging from the reactions of Yu Shi's fans, they seem to have accepted the reality that Yu Shi was removed from the CCTV Mid-Autumn Festival Gala. They comfort themselves just to avoid public controversy and believe that the statement from Yu Shi's studio is enough to clarify all controversies.

However, if you take a closer look at the CCTV Mid-Autumn Festival Gala lineup, you will find that the self-comfort of Yu Shi's fans is somewhat untenable - Huang Xuan, who was involved in the controversy one after another with Yu Shi, is still in the CCTV Mid-Autumn Festival Gala lineup.

Both Huang Xuan and Yu Shi have been involved in private life scandals recently, and they are all named by name. The people who broke the news have a tough attitude and leave no room for themselves. Huang Xuan was exposed to domestic violence. To a certain extent, compared to Yu Shi The controversy over Shi's private life is even more serious.

However, Huang Xuan and Yu Shi responded completely differently. At first, Huang Xuan was exposed by the paparazzi using a silhouette, but his studio immediately stood up and denied it. They completely broke up with the paparazzi. After being named by the paparazzi, Huang Xuan chose Prosecution, showing a screenshot of the submission of case filing materials.

At this time, the difference between Yu Shi and Huang Xuan can be seen from the details.

Before public opinion broke out, Huang Xuan Studio responded. It refuted the rumors very quickly. It denied it within the golden three-hour clarification period. Then it directly sued the source of the news, the two paparazzi, and exposed the case. process, confirm that the case has been filed.

As for Yu Shi...

Faced with Zhang Yuqi's connotation and a series of industry revelations, Yu Shi and his team delayed and delayed, and finally issued two statements. In the end, they completely avoided Zhang Yuqi, the source of the controversy, let alone the so-called case situation. Explain that there is not even a case submission or a receipt.

A lawyer surnamed Yin pointed out the problem with Yu Shi Studio’s statement. He hit the nail on the head and pointed out the fundamental reason why the effectiveness of statements in the entertainment industry is becoming less and less nowadays - "Actually, statements are just talking about oneself, not It’s useless. It’s all about using real weapons and evidence. It doesn’t matter whether you call the police or prosecute. Once the results are announced, that’s all.”

If we go back five years, a celebrity’s statement would still be quite convincing. Unfortunately, domestic entertainment has already entered an era of overturning statements - either suing reputation rights and covering netizens’ mouths, or using the word “fake” to comfort fans. .

The Canadian actor surnamed Wu was sentenced to 13 years in prison. He sued for reputation rights and won the lawsuit. The netizen who told the truth was sentenced to pay 250,000 yuan in compensation. It took several years for the truth to come out;

Li Moumou, who was also removed from the CCTV party, He made a statement to refute the rumors and showed up in person. Fortunately, the slap in the face came quickly, otherwise another netizen who told the truth might have been sued.

Or just look at Wu Jinyan’s wedding scandal. It was obviously a happy event, but it turned out to be a classic case of celebrity overturning due to long-term deception of netizens and false clarifications.

- Wu Jinyan has been photographed several times during the 7 years of her relationship. From herself to the boss of the company, Yu Zheng lined up to speak to clarify her relationship. She was determined not to admit the relationship. After finally admitting the relationship and choosing to get married, netizens expressed confusion and were about to be criticized : " I lied to you, so what do you think?”

I still remember when the Yu Shi controversy escalated, some netizens called for him to be banned, and the reason given was that he would corrupt the outlook of minors.

In fact, many times when netizens ask for a star to be banned, it is not directed at them personally. If a star makes a statement, it can offset all negative controversies. Isn’t this a disguised form of encouragement for celebrities to use their right to speak as public figures to suppress public opinion? In the final analysis, netizens just want to reduce the bad atmosphere in the entertainment industry, and reducing the exposure of controversial celebrities can exactly achieve this.

Unauthorized reprinting of this article is strictly prohibited. Violators will be prosecuted!