[Global Network Report] According to a report from Taiwan's Zhongshi News Network on September 5, People's Party Chairman Ke Wenzhe was involved in the case of Jinghua City's floor area ratio fraud. After the trial, the judge found that Ke Wenzhe knowingly increased the area to J

[Global Network Report] According to a report from Taiwan's Zhongshi News Network on September 5, People's Party Chairman Ke Wenzhe was involved in the case of Jinghua City's floor area ratio fraud. After the trial, the judge found that Ke Wenzhe knowingly increased the area by more than 560% to Jinghua City. The case violated relevant regulations, but he still insisted on doing it, which resulted in the accomplice Shen Qingjing receiving more than NT$20 billion in illegal benefits in the Jinghua City case, and it was ruled that his detention was forbidden. Can protest. The latest reports from Taiwanese media such as Lianhe News Network stated that Ko Wenzhe stepped into the prison car at 5:50 pm wearing an off-white coat and handcuffs, and spoke to the media without saying a word the whole time.

The Taipei District Court held a detention court again on the afternoon of the 5th and ruled that Ke Wenzhe should be detained without permission. Ke then boarded a prison car and went to the Taipei Detention Center. Picture from Taiwan's "Central News Agency"

reported that judge Lu Zhengye believed that after questioning, Ke Wenzhe did not dispute some of the facts mentioned in the application, and the statements of the defendant, accomplices, witnesses, and relevant documentary materials were sufficient to prove it. The defendant knew that increasing the area by more than 560% to Jinghua City violated relevant regulations, but still persisted in doing so. As a result, his accomplice Shen Qingjing obtained illegal benefits of more than 20 billion yuan in the Jinghua City case. The defendant is seriously suspected of committing the crime of profiteering in Article 6, Item 1, Paragraph 4 of the Corruption and Corruption Regulations.

The judge said that although the content of the current application and the facts of the case grasped by the investigating prosecutor, this case formally meets the requirements for the crime of profiteering under Article 6 of the Corruption Offenses Ordinance. However, whether what the defendant did was simply to benefit Shen Qingjing, the accomplice of Jinghua City, or whether he had a scheduled appointment with Shen Qingjing or even accepted bribes in violation of his duties remains to be ascertained by the investigating prosecutor. The judge said that because this case was a corruption crime, which resulted in the accomplice Shen Qingjing receiving more than NT$20 billion in illegal benefits in the Jinghua City case, which had a far-reaching impact on society, he therefore believed that it could not be replaced by guarantee, liability, and restricted residence, and that he should be detained. If necessary, the defendant will be detained in the Taipei Detention Center in accordance with regulations, and visits and correspondence will be prohibited.

Taiwan's "Central News Agency" stated that Ke Wenzhe stepped onto the prison van at 5:50 pm on the 5th, his hands were handcuffed, and he had no clothes to cover his handcuffed hands. His face was expressionless and he did not say a word. The prison van immediately drove to the Taipei Detention Center.

United News Network previously reported that Taiwan’s anti-corruption unit has been investigating the Beijing Huacheng case for several months. Last week, it launched a large-scale search and applied for the detention of Shen Qingjing, chairman of Weijin Group (the Beijing Huacheng developer), and Taipei City officials on charges of offering and accepting bribes. Councilor Ying Xiaowei and his assistant Wu Shunmin obtained permission to search and summon Ko Wenzhe and former Taipei City Deputy Mayor Peng Zhensheng to the case. After interrogation, they applied for detention on charges of profiteering and accepting bribes in violation of their duties.

The Taipei District Court held that Ke Wenzhe was not a participant of the Taipei City Urban Planning Commission and could not directly know the meeting. He had no relevant expertise. The evidence presented by the prosecutor had room for other reasonable explanations and the criminal suspicion was not serious. It ruled on September 2 that Ke Wenzhe was not a participant in the meeting. "Please come back without guarantee."

After supplementing the information, the Taipei District Prosecutor's Office filed a protest on September 3. Taiwan's "High Court" believed that based on relevant documentary evidence, Ke Wenzhe had actively participated in the Jinghua City case, and whether he knew nothing about the Jinghua City case or had not done so. Doubtful, there is still a need to investigate. On the 4th, the "return without bail" ruling was revoked and sent back to the Taipei District Court for a further ruling.