Some plots of Hong Kong movies represented by Jackie Chan are arranged in this way, which I think is inappropriate.

movie 1573℃
As we all know, in the 90s of the last century, whether it was Hong Kong, Taiwan, the Mainland, Southeast Asia, or even Europe, the United States, and Hong Kong, movies were prosperous and the production volume was amazing. It can be said that the brilliance of Hong Kong movies has made many movie stars of that era. Such as: Jackie Chan, Sammo Hung, Chow Yun-fat, Stephen Chow, Jet Li, etc. These movie stars also brought such a rich cultural and entertainment life to our 80s and 90s when we were young.

Some plots of Hong Kong movies represented by Jackie Chan are arranged in this way, which I think is inappropriate. - Lujuba

However, in many Hong Kong movies, there are also some improperly designed plots. Which movies? Why is it inappropriate? Below, the author will come up with specific examples to analyze one by one.

Jackie Chan's movie "Police Story 3 Super Cop"

Some plots of Hong Kong movies represented by Jackie Chan are arranged in this way, which I think is inappropriate. - Lujuba

In the ending plot of this movie, Jackie Chan, in order to chase the big drug lord Guess the tyrant and others, directly snatched the car of innocent passers-by and drove to chase him. Although at that critical juncture, subduing the bad guys is the most important, but we can't put all his credits above the lives and property of innocent people, right? Is the life and property of innocent passers-by not important? Even if it is compelling, at least there must be a follow-up explanation in the film, right? Unfortunately, there is no such follow-up explanation in the film.

Some plots of Hong Kong movies represented by Jackie Chan are arranged in this way, which I think is inappropriate. - Lujuba

is in another episode of this film. Roughly similar to Jackie Chan's. Jackie Chan is grabbing cars, and Michelle Yeoh is grabbing motorcycles. In order to chase Guess the drug lord and the others, Michelle Yeoh, without the consent of others, went straight to grab the motorcycle and chased the Guess and the others in the helicopter on a motorcycle. Let the protagonist come to hurt innocent passers-by like this? Is this arrangement really appropriate? It seems that the motorcycle owner is really innocent.

Jackie Chan's movie "Police Story 4 Simple Mission"

is also in the plot of the finale of this movie. In order to chase bad guys, Jackie Chan steals other people's cars directly. Although the speed stunts shocked everyone, we can't take innocent passers-by. Bet your life and property, right? Could it be said that the lives and property of innocent passers-by are not important?

Jackie Chan's movie "Red Zone"

is also in the plot of the finale of this movie. In order to organize the hovercraft rampant on the street, Jackie Chan decisively snatched someone else’s car and took a serrated knife to cut the hovercraft. Make it leak, thereby forcing the hovercraft to stop. Although Jackie Chan was to save innocent lives and injuries, he had to do it, but there was no subsequent explanation. I think that handling the plot in this way is not appropriate.

Jet Li's movie "Bodyguard of Zhongnanhai"

In the key plot of this movie, there is a plot: a policeman on duty on the road wants to participate in a gun battle in the mall and punish the bad guys, but he does not know Liang Fatty, who broke out of the mall, was a policeman and shot at Liang Fatty. At this time, Jet Li blatantly fired directly at the police in order to save Liang Fatty, who was in danger of his life, shooting a total of 7 bullets, causing the Hong Kong policeman to die on the spot. However, afterwards, the story did not explain whether Jet Li was held accountable, but the policeman’s brother Wang Jianjun came to avenge Jet Li. Then, we can’t help asking: Although Jet Li shot the police to protect the safety of the person involved, as Zhongnanhai’s bodyguard, no matter how he shied away, he also killed someone. Since he killed someone, why didn’t the police come to the door? The author believes that this design of the plot is somewhat inappropriate.

Jet Li's movie "A Letter to Dad"

The improper plot in this movie, the author believes, was at the beginning of the film: when Jet Li, a public security officer, was acting as an undercover agent in Beijing and trading fake passports with a small gangster , Wrestled with the group of gangsters, and then smashed a brick wall, but again, there was no subsequent explanation, and no explanation was given whether to compensate the owner of the brick wall. Although these plots are branches of the main line, even if they are branches and leaves, are they not important? Can you ignore them?

Therefore, to summarize the statement: Can you discuss whether these actions by the protagonists in the film are legitimate? In the film, there is no explanation of the processing results, or even whether there is any processing. Is such a plot design really appropriate?

Finally, to sum up: a clear main story line, wonderful martial arts action, of course, can increase the highlight of the movie, but, We cannot ignore the handling of some details about the branch. After all, we are now living in the new China under the rule of law, not the old China before.

The copyright of this article belongs to Funny Du Ge, no unit/individual may reprint it without my authorization! Offenders must be investigated!

Tags: movie