We know that the movie " Nothing Can't Be Solved by Hotpot " which was released during the May Day holiday seems to have been very unsatisfactory at the box office. For this reason, it chose to withdraw it after a few days. This is not the same as the movie "" starring Andy Lau at the beginning of this year. Mr. Red Carpet 》One way?
Just after "Nothing That Can't Be Solved by Hot Pot" was announced to be withdrawn, there was naturally overwhelming criticism on the Internet.
In fact, why the box office of "Nothing Can't Be Solved by Hot Pot" was so poor this time. Netizens actually expressed their opinions early on for this reason. They think that the quality of "Nothing Can't Be Solved by Hot Pot" is actually still good. Yes, the acting skills of Yang Mi and as the heroines are definitely criticized, they are the same no matter what they play.
Coupled with the popularity of the spy drama "Harbin 1944" starring Yang Mi and Qin Hao during this period, countless netizens believed that it was Yang Mi who caused the drama's reputation to plummet, so much so that Qin Even Hao's acting skills can't save the situation. In fact, you can watch the barrage. Those crazy and taunting words are simply going to swallow up our power.
What can I say? As for the issue of Yang Mi's acting skills, the famous director Li Shaohong and teacher have pointedly commented very early on. They believed that Yang Mi would involuntarily perform programmed performances, and even she seemed not to be aware of it.
Let’s get back to the topic. On May 8, Ding Sheng, the director of “Nothing That Can’t Be Solved by Hot Pot”, personally responded to the film’s withdrawal at the Beijing Film Academy Creator Exchange Meeting. What comes to mind is that Ding Sheng's response this time has completely kicked the bucket of countless netizens and caused great controversy.
So how did director Ding Sheng respond?
Ding Sheng bluntly said that this movie is actually very strict about rules, but it encountered things that did not follow the rules. It cannot be released at the moment, and I will choose to meet everyone when the time comes.
Furthermore, director Ding Sheng also made a very interesting point. He bluntly said that this movie actually has a viewing threshold. If someone is looking at a mobile phone or doing other things during the movie, it will definitely not be watched;
In addition, Ding Sheng It also emphasized that there is indeed a big problem with the promotion of the movie, and generally speaking, the reviews are polarized.
This is director Ding Sheng’s response to the film’s withdrawal. What do you think after seeing it?
To be honest, when I saw the first point, I was still a little confused. What is the meaning of a movie with rules? If something does not follow the rules, could it be that someone is threatening it?
Furthermore, Ding Sheng has pushed the "viewing threshold". To be honest, this view has been around for a long time. It seems that I have heard similar remarks a few years ago. It should be the famous director Feng Xiaogang who said similar things. According to Ding What Sheng means is that not everyone is qualified to watch your "Hot Pot"? Could it be that the poor quality of your film is also the fault of the audience?
In addition, Ding Sheng said that "audiences cannot look at their mobile phones midway". How do you actually say this? I believe that most viewers spend money to go to the cinema to watch a movie. Naturally, they go there with the purpose of being interested in the movie. If the movie is good, If so, who is bored scrolling through their cell phones or chatting? Shouldn't it be because the movie is too trashy and the audience can't watch it? When did it become stipulated that if a movie is not good enough, viewers who have spent money on movie tickets must grit their teeth and watch it to the end?
Director Ding Sheng's response was really shocking. The movie's poor box office was blamed on the audience and the market's rules being unfriendly to his movies. Anyway, there were no problems with his movies.
The comment area responded like this:
"It's weird that the latrine can't poop?"
"Such a bad movie actually holds an exchange meeting in Beijing Film Academy? The film school is really bad"
"The audience for the bad movie doesn't buy it, which implies the level of the audience. Low, you guys are high-level, just keep it for yourself and enjoy it, why are you still showing it?”
“You don’t like it because you can’t understand my film. Someone made it difficult for me to withdraw it, but I won’t tell you what happened or who.” Guess. He's acting like a hooligan."
In addition, I always feel that the movie "Nothing That Can't Be Solved by Hot Pot" did not do well at the box office. I can't blame it on Yang Mi. Maybe Yang Mi's acting skills are not that outstanding, but she is. Have you never thought that maybe your director was not good at directing? If you look at Stephen Chow's movies, many of the actors were selected on short notice. How come under Stephen Chow's direction, there can even be such explosive performances?
What do you think?
