is suspected of plagiarism, but I haven’t recognized
as a popular professional player. Let me sigh a little. From the end of the year to now, there have been so many big and small news in the industry. The one that stirs up public opinion and triggers heated discussions is: Dong Yuhui, who is just starting out and is not even considered a pure insider, can definitely be ranked in the top three (for the other two places, I vote for Luo Yonghao and Dong Mingzhu).
No, not long after Dongfang Selection's "internal troubles" were calmed down, they ushered in their "foreign troubles" just a few years ago.
Recently, Yang Fan, the host of the IP called "Yang Fan Talks about Art", posted a video pointing out that in Dong Yuhui's newly opened independent live broadcast room "Walking with Hui", the anchor Dong Dong (I hereby emphasize that Dong Dong is not Dong Yuhui) The content explained during the live broadcast plagiarized the original content he posted on social platforms in 2021.
The evidence mainly includes two aspects;
First, the complex relationship structure of Renaissance artists is revealed in the form of master and apprentice. Both creativity and speaking skills are inseparable from his own.
Yang Fan said that because foreign apprenticeships generally follow a contract system, expressing the relationship between artists in the form of apprenticeship is to make it easier for domestic friends to understand; and what seems to be a simple and humorous short paragraph actually contains The intricate relationship requires searching a lot of documents. The implication is that this is the crystallization of one's own wisdom and sweat, but it is picked up by others, without being informed or declared, and is used for commercial purposes. It is unfair.
Secondly, a certain picture of Michelangelo's work released in the live broadcast room, both in terms of picture content and layout format, is exactly the same as that in Yang Fan's early videos.
Yang Fan also added that in fact, the statue should not be the work of Michelangelo, but an example he found. The original sculpture no longer exists. What does mean? Even the mistakes were copied! As soon as the
video came out, Dong Yuhui and the newly established "Walking with Hui" fell into the forefront of public opinion. Regarding the accusation of plagiarism,
host Dong Dong said during the live broadcast that some teachers' works may be used when explaining art, but there is no intention to offend. If you have any questions, you can communicate in time.
sounds very "public relations", but when I replied, it seemed like I didn't reply. The vague words conveyed the subtext of "everything is a misunderstanding".
Dong Dong also claimed that his message to "Yang Fan Lectures Art" was deleted, while "Yang Fan Lectures Art" claimed that it had not been deleted. He was also insulted by the other party's fans. The other party even gave him a 500 yuan gift during his live broadcast, suspecting that he wanted to turn things over. articles.
Um... If there is really plagiarism, if "Walking with Hui" really paid for this 500 yuan gift, then this is too insulting, right? Can the efforts that others put into making original works and the price of one's own misconduct be written off in one go with just five hundred yuan?
Yang Fan was so angry that he directly "increased the number" in the follow-up video and listed another piece of evidence of plagiarism - explaining the meaning of the name based on the linguistic factors of the foreign name, and then making up an unreliable Chinese name to make it funny, no matter what the name is. Whether it’s the method of use or the specific content, Dong Dong’s expressions are exactly the same as his.
This is embarrassing. Sister Bao suddenly remembered a saying - when you find a cockroach, it means there may be at least one nest in your home. This has to be a "habitual offender", right?
Fans protect the fans, and the reasons are weird
But presumably, the various comments of Dong Yuhui's "mother-in-law" must have made Yang Fan even more speechless than the response in the live broadcast room of "Walking with Hui".
I read around the comment area, and based on Yang Fan's own "constant complaints", I summarized the fans' reasons for protecting the Lord into the following four:
1, if you really have reason to go through legal channels, how about an online trial?
2, I think you are just taking advantage of Dong Yuhui’s traffic.
3. You have to be grateful. If you didn’t plagiarize, who would know you? I would be giving you publicity in vain!
4, there are a lot of articles in the world, aren’t you just a porter?
is so angry just looking at it, let me refute them one by one.
on why not take legal action?
As we all know, the cost for ordinary people to protect their rights through legal means is higher, whether in terms of time, energy or money. Considering the input-output ratio, many people will choose to put up with it or settle privately. Yang Fan also said in the video that he just wanted an apology and an original statement. He may have thought at first that this was something he could get by shouting on the Internet.
Furthermore, although he is not as good as Dong Yuhui, he is still a professional blogger with millions of fans. Why can’t he use this resource? The presidential election must rely on public opinion to build momentum. Obtaining a certain amount of support and putting pressure on the other party are legitimate means to achieve one's own goals, and of course they can be used.
is about using traffic to increase your followers.
If you want to say it was Simba who did this, I 100% believe it, but Yang Fan is an art education and science blogger, and he also claims to be a college art teacher. He attracts and maintains fans, and he relies more on It is the content and character design in the vertical field. As he said himself, relying on this wave of hot spots to attract a wave of fans that cannot be reached by eight poles will have little significance for his weight on the platform and monetization. On the contrary, it will be harmful rather than helpful.
Regarding plagiarism, it is free publicity.
If there is any "publicity effect", it is because Yang Fan jumped out. Otherwise, those things would have achieved the fame and fortune of "Walking with Hui", and no one would know the original author. Why, do you think that you are the emperor, and you should be grateful if you use anyone's things to double your worth?
In the previous incident of Dongfang Xiaosun, he was bullied and excluded, so the mother-in-law's confrontation with the executives and defending Xiao Dong was justice; now, Dong Yuhui may have done something wrong in the live broadcast room, and the mothers-in-law are talking baldly. He was able to make sense out of what was unreasonable. Xiao Dong was not only innocent, but also a tall benefactor. This possible victim became the beneficiary.
This is equivalent to someone punching me and asking me to call him dad, because he is relatively famous. After he punched me, I also made headlines. I have never received so much attention since I was a child. I am so honored. Oh, Bi Xin~
is nothing like this!
In this logic, Dong Yuhui always ranks at the top, and even the facts can come second. He cannot be questioned or hurt. For this reason, fans will use various reasons (such as "He is still a child"). ""Who would know you without him") maintains his correctness and perfection, but is completely unable to see the demands and situations of others. It seems that everyone in the world is surrounding Xiaodong, either to save him or to harm him. People, otherwise they are the lucky ones who are favored by him.
This is a typical narcissistic projection: I don’t want Dong Yuhui to be questioned or hurt, but I actually don’t want myself to be questioned or hurt. I assume that the whole world revolves around Xiao Dong, but I actually want to dominate the world with my own ideas.
Under this mentality, their speech and behavior will show a conflicting sense of childishness and domineering - childish in that many cognitions violate common sense, such as the sentence "He is still a child" that shocked Yang Fan; domineering in that , standing behind "Perfect Container" Dong Yuhui, they have a sense of superiority of the privileged class, like the minions next to the big brother, they can point condescendingly at others and say: "Copying you is to give you face, get out of here!"
Finally It is this "copy of a large number of articles in the world".
The "mutual reference" in the self-media circle is not only serious, it is simply rampant. But compared with it, what makes me black-eyed is that the popularity of such remarks as "it's all copied anyway, it's not clean" shows what is right and wrong. The standards have also become blurred.
You say you are original, but others are trying to uproot the foundation of your originality - "Aren't you just a hot-pot guy?" "Aren't you just a knowledge porter?"...
Of course there is a "feeling inferior to you" The twisted mentality of self-proven superiority is at work, but on the other hand, it is also related to the "overflow of information, and individual information becomes increasingly worthless."
Compared with the authoritative media in the early years, the threshold for self-media bloggers is simply much lower. People watching may have an account with a small number of fans, which means that the existence of self-media content itself does not It is famous for its credibility, so it is naturally difficult for users to have awe of it.
However, a mixture of good and bad does not mean "dragon = fish", and the boundary between originality and plagiarism should not be blurred.
Yes, the world is inherently fluid. I learn from you and you learn from me. No one can be strong alone in a vacuum, but there are moving skills and different styles of reporting. For the same book, the same work of art, and the same historical story, everyone will have a different perspective, and their ability and method of sharing will also be different.
We often say "break it apart and knead it into pieces and feed it to you", but some people don't have the strength to break it apart or knead it into pieces, while others are quite talented and willing to work hard at breaking it up and kneading it into pieces. The latter It deserves to be respected accordingly.
Like Yang Fan, he said that he checked a lot of information and came up with various humorous and fun ways to educate and entertain. If what is said is true, it is equivalent to him personally collecting rich ingredients and cooking a meal. A unique meal with his own style for people to enjoy. Can you say "because he gets the ingredients from nature, he is just a porter, the same as the fake chef who orders takeout and heats it up at home"?
Even in the virtual Internet world, there should be a minimum of respect for wisdom, hard work, and sweat, right?
Instead of being obsessed with Dong Yuhui, it is better to finish reading a book
After reading the madness of the "mothers-in-law", I couldn't help but put the lid on the pot and "speak arrogantly": It is really not necessary to pursue Dong Yuhui so much.
I don’t question his simplicity and kindness, as well as his rich knowledge reserve and good eloquence, but in everything, you have to look at the essence and get to the root. Dong Yuhui, who has many fans, is now a big Internet celebrity and a self-made celebrity. An ace salesman with a strong base.
This means:
As soon as he came, the relationship between him and his fans could not escape the influence of the fandom culture. Although he got out of the circle by outputting golden sentences and spreading knowledge, many people who like him took a fancy to him. It is Dong Yuhui himself. They did not choose him as the ideal object to learn knowledge. Knowledge bloggers become celebrities, which can also make people blind and crazy. This is contrary to the effect of knowledge itself on people;
Secondly, Since he is ultimately an ace salesman, his output in the live broadcast room will intentionally or unintentionally revolve around the product. In other words, before the product is revealed, all the chicken soup, golden sentences, and beautiful knowledge of are like golden threads trying to weave a colorful and gorgeous advertisement, making people yearn for it, be happy, and then stay here obediently. , then place the order obediently.
Come on, let’s excerpt a piece of Xiao Dong’s “masterpiece”:
“I have never taken you to see the white snow in the Changbai Mountains, I have not taken you to feel the breeze blowing in the fields in October, I have not taken you to see the heavy Gusui, who bends down like a wise man, has not taken you to witness all this, but my dear, I can take you to taste such rice, romance is not only about the starry sky and sea of flowers, but also about the world of fireworks."
So true. A piece of beautiful text with a visual feel cannot change the essence of it being a product placement. Isn't the reason why they "learn from" large tracts of content out of pressure to output "exquisite advertising content" at a high frequency? The "behind-the-scenes operator" of high-frequency output is of course the sales KPI of the live broadcast room.
You can briefly bathe in the cultural glory of the live broadcast room, feel the sublimation of your thoughts, obtain an emotional value that is separate from the world, and have the illusion of "as if I have become literate" through passionate orders.
But that is just an illusion after all. People's deep essence cannot be truly enriched by playing on social platforms and consuming.
Wandering on social platforms, no matter how much useful information you read or how many so-called hard-core bloggers you follow, what you are doing is for entertainment and recreation, not learning.Learning has always been boring, power-consuming, and voluntary, rather than interesting, relaxing, and catered to.
Not to mention advertising, any form of advertising is aimed at creating dreams. It wears a gorgeous coat to output anxiety or yearning to you, and then waves its sleeves, leaving no trace of depth behind.
Dong Yuhui likes to use metaphors and big comparisons. What he says always sounds beautiful, but let’s take a closer look at the meaning behind it, which is a bowl of “ancient chicken soup.”
For example, this paragraph:
"When you are memorizing words, the crocodiles in Alaska are jumping out of the water; when you are doing math, the seagulls in the South Pacific are passing by the coast; when you are studying in the evening, the polar circles of the earth are colorful; but Young man, you have to realize your dream and see the world in person. The future is promising and you should try your best! When you work hard for the future, those people and scenery that you think you can’t see will become a reality. They will all appear in your life eventually."
Isn't that a short inspirational text that uses the beautiful scenery around the world to 'tempt' you to work hard?
sounds like a lot of work, but it's actually quite simple.
It’s still what I have said n times. In any media industry, there are many “just superficial” elements in it. Watching TV, watching programs, and listening to advertisements can open your eyes and learn a few words from them. It’s a fashionable and beautiful thing to say, but if you want to seriously learn knowledge and improve yourself, then don’t deceive yourself and others.
suggests that instead of being obsessed with Dong Yuhui, it is better to finish a book honestly.
Of course, this does not refer to random best-sellers, but to those classic books that have stood the test of time.
They will be more sincere, either outputting some research results after layers of arguments, or detailing some real experiences through field trips, or telling a story showing the diversity of human nature in a delicate way. In short, you can rest assured, whether it is a book or a book At the end, there was no little yellow car that suddenly jumped out.
and
, the content expressed in a book is usually systematic, with a framework and a whole, rather than fragmented. This is similar to if the doctor tells you to replenish your body and eat more meat, eggs, and milk, then you definitely can't eat just one meal or only for one day. You have to eat continuously, at least enough for a course of treatment, and the nutrients are gradually added up, so that you can get better. You become stronger.
Isn’t this true for eating spiritual food? The accumulation of all the half-knowledge can only piece together a larger half-knowledge. Only by eating a certain module whole can it be injected into one's own blood and bones. Otherwise, if you just listen to a few ancient stories, you will talk about your view of history, and after paying attention to a few social news, you dare to point out the salt-alkali land. Isn’t that nonsense?
Of course, reading makes people sleepy, and reading words makes people dizzy. If it weren’t for the fact that reading itself is such a hindrance, many people wouldn’t be able to get cheap satisfaction by watching live broadcasts and lectures by intellectuals.
But the fact is that doing some difficult and inhumane things can often bring about greater growth.
So in 2024, let’s encourage each other. Watch less live broadcasts and read more books; play less on mobile phones and read more books. If you read two or three books in a row, you might be instantly disenchanted with Dong Yuhui. Try it?
(Don’t look for it, there is no link to sell books~~)
