Actually, this show is very bad. Because it is made up of unit stories, it is much easier to evaluate one of the units, but the whole show is really a bit confusing.
More importantly, the stories in the play are all adapted from real cases. It has a certain influence on the parties in reality, and this influence is sensitive, so it is not easy to draw conclusions.
focuses on this adaptation. Many people think that the adaptation is not a nonsense and that jokes are not nonsense, so they have very opinions on several cases in the play. But there are also many people, including me, who think that this is not a documentary. Its purpose is to popularize the law and to show the achievements of the rule of law over the years. In fact, it is a TV series, so there is no need to sit in the right seat, and you have to struggle with the various details in it.
In fact, even a documentary can't 100% restore the truth, there must be an element of artistic processing. After all, whether it is a film or a documentary, it is a category of art. It can restore reality as much as possible, but it is not necessary and cannot fully restore reality.
Those who are against it will say that this show is a hit. There are so many cases in society, why do they have to be adapted? What I want to say is that, no matter whether it is popular or not, the show is mainly for people to watch. If you are a screenwriter, you will definitely adapt some popular and controversial cases. On the one hand, it will increase the ratings, and on the other hand, its effect of popularizing the law is better.
As for the boundaries of adaptation? I believe it is difficult for the audience to speak clearly, which requires professional analysis and discussion. So I'll put the controversy aside for now and talk about the merits of this show. The advantages of this drama
are obvious, the biggest advantage is that it dares to shoot. What is popular and what is typical. Whether it is the case of mother humiliation, the murder of mother, the sudden death of the anchor, the murder of a girlfriend, the case of jumping from a truck, or the case of joining a milk tea shop, every case has caused a lot of controversy. The
drama shows how the judge considers the case, how to investigate and collect evidence, how to draw conclusions, and how to be fair and equitable. What is the purpose of the law? Why mediation? Why go to court? These contents are very educational for the audience.
is of course the biggest gain for me, but it is a small case. Because these small cases are things that we don't usually pay attention to, it happened, which made me feel incredible, which is equivalent to teaching me a lesson.
For example, in the Li Fangning case, the scumbag was brought to court just by touching her back. At that time, I thought it was a big deal. Is it necessary to put it on the line like this? But later it was discovered that there were a lot of unspeakable hidden hidden behind this action. The scumbag did not once but many times, and he did not just attack Li Fangning alone.
Another example is that several elementary school students who spoke ill of others behind their backs were also brought to court. This is purely the category of elementary school students' quarrels, but they were also accused? But it does have a bad effect on the parties involved. And the neighbor of the proprietress Hu Xiaoqing was also accused of installing a camera in front of her house because it violated the proprietress's personal privacy.
To be honest, I really did not expect these actions to be illegal and to be taken to court. That's because I don't know the law, and all these contents are written in Civil Code . If you have time, you really need to read it, otherwise, you may not be able to figure it out when you become a defendant.
This drama not only shows us the law, but also shows the daily life and work of the judges. According to this standard, the judges are not easy. Working overtime is the norm, and not being able to take care of the family is also a problem for every judge. What is even more frightening is that this profession is simply a high-risk job, and the parties may take retaliation at any time. Both Fang Yuan and Zhou Yi'an had experienced it before, and it was simply the aftermath of the catastrophe.
Of course, there are some shortcomings. The thing that bothers me the most is the dramaIt clearly shows unfriendliness towards lawyers. If the judge turns to become a lawyer, it is equivalent to deserters and will be despised by the group. Zhou Yi'an enjoys such treatment. They are also legal workers, so there is really no need to be so stiff.
there is a bit of machismo. The male protagonist Fang Yuan is such a person, although he occasionally helps with housework after get off work. But in fact, the family affairs, including the children's education, are basically the wife's full responsibility. When something went wrong with the child, he accused his wife of doing something wrong and said she had become a philistine. This is really sad. Although there is only a different division of labor within the Lord and the Lord, don't always look down on those who take care of children at home.
Let's talk about the finale. The main reason is that Jin Afen's sentencing is a bit incomprehensible, although her amount is relatively huge. But the degree of harm cannot be higher than that of Mahans. Moreover, Jin Efen performed meritorious deeds and got a letter of understanding from the other party, but in the end he became the one with the heaviest sentence. It's really frustrating.
finally hopes that it will have a second part, or even a third part, because the work of popularizing the law is too important, and it is too uncomfortable to accidentally become a defendant. Ordinary people will not read any civil code at all, but they will watch TV series. If they can learn legal knowledge from TV series, why not do it?
