Bao Bell once again proved to us that everyone criticizes the entertainment industry, but the entertainment industry cannot stand criticism.
The list of winners of the 2022 Golden Broom has been released.
Among them, Bao Beier was a strong finalist with Douban 4.4's bad film " Sunshine Sisters Tao", and finally won the most disappointing director award.
and rationally adopted a comment written by a person named "Li Ning", thinking that "Sunshine Sister Tao" directed by Bao Beier was a poor imitation show, and finally sent it to "The director has a threshold and needs to enter the industry. Caution" 's warning.
Originally, this award was just a small splash, and it didn't have much popularity, but he was very dissatisfied when he learned that he was awarded the award, Bao Beier.
opened fire directly in the circle of friends, with fierce friendly greetings.
focused on this small composition, and the summary is:
questioned the opacity of the selection, and felt that the golden broom Cheng Qingsong had suspicions against him.
thinks that he has put his heart into his work and should not get such a bad review.
To this, Cheng Qingsong did not reply, nor could he reply.
[1]
Bao Bell can disagree, but there is nothing wrong with winning the golden broom award.
In fact, this is not the first time that Bao Beier has won an "award", and this anger is more like a story of long-standing resentment.
After all, from the 12th to the 13th Golden Broom Most Disappointing Director Award, Bao Beier has won two consecutive terms.
is not convinced, but is Bell wronged for winning the prize?
In the list of winners of the Golden Broom in 2022, the most disappointing director is not only Bao Beier, but also Zheng Xiaolong, who "a "Zhen Huan Biography" will guarantee a lifetime of prosperity and wealth.
has three most disappointing films, namely: " Hotel " with a score of 3.1, "Turandot: The Origin of the Curse" with a score of 3.1, and " Li Mao as the Prince " with a score of 4.3.
And, the most disappointing screenwriters are Gao Ke and Yang Xiaoli, the screenwriters of "Li Mao as the Prince".
The most disappointing actors and actresses are Chang Yuan and Ma Li of "Li Mao Plays the Prince".
The viewers who often watch movies will be able to say "everything deserves it".
In the current domestic film market, good films are hard to choose, but bad films are definitely abundant.
Let's not mention whether this award is fair or not. Just looking at Bao Beier's remake of "Sunshine Sisters Amoy" is definitely "no loss for winning the award".
In 2011, "Sunshine Sisters Amoy" was released in South Korea, and the film was very popular.
is highly loved even in the Chinese market, with 510,000 people on Douban giving it a high score of 8.8.
in the must-see list of Douban Top250, ranked 145th.
This 2011 movie, even if I watch it 11 years later, can still be moved to tears.
so that when I learned that Bao Beier directed the Chinese version of "Sunshine Sisters Tao", I was questioned "Why is Bao Dao, is it because the bald head is 'strong'?" Bauber really screwed up as expected.
bear the brunt of the problem, standing on the shoulders of giants and directly copying the homework of Xueba.
Character copy, bridge copy, setting copy, mirror copy, moving mirror, copy, and even... filter copy.
Take a shot at the beginning as an example, the same picture, the same behavior, can't say that it has nothing to do with it, it can only say that it is exactly the same. Looking at this remake of
, not only will there be no turbulence in my heart, but I will also have the urge to "watch the original film". The high-quality remakes of
often take the core of the story of the original work, and then adapt and adapt appropriately to achieve a more cordial and authentic look and feel for the audience in the remake market.
The story of the Korean version of "Sunshine Sisters Taoism" takes place in a specific era in South Korea, and it is the youth memory of a generation. The remake version of
was put in the national version in 1997. Under the situation of ordinary high school, it is obviously not acclimatized.
Second, is the lack of production standards.
The full screen filter in middle school, the atmosphere light of the male god and the airborne pink bubble rain are very tasteless.
The place that should be left is not left, and the place that should be changed is not changed. The national version of "Sunshine Sisters" accurately removes its essence. In the original version of
, the heart-warming scene that paid tribute to the classic love film "First Kiss" was deleted. The song "sunny", which seemed to be brainwashed with the symbols of the times, was replaced by "Can&39;t Take My Eyes Off, which was pleasant but not memorable. You".
made the appointment in the original version into a farce of urban management chasing peddler, the metaphor of social class contradiction is gone, making the adapted version pale and powerless.
And the most criticized place is that the feminism in the original film is very bright. In the
remake, female topics are forcibly avoided. In the original version of
, when people reach middle age, the personality of "My husband cheats and I cheat too" is different. In the
remake, her cheating husband bought her a suite at Sanya and gave her a sports car , and she chose to forgive her completely.
Therefore, the remake of "Sunshine Sisters Taoism" was also publicly dissed by Fudan professor Shen Yifei : This film directly stigmatizes female friendship!
seems to tell a lot of female stories, but the final destination is still the traditional one.
understands Bao Beier's "dissatisfaction", but there is nothing wrong with winning the Golden Broom Award.
[2]
Over the years, Bao Beier has been transforming and has been complained about. The movie " Fat Man Action Team " directed by
scored 4.2 points on Douban;
" Our New Life " scored 4.8 points on Douban; " Northeast Lover " produced by
scored 4.6 points on Douban.
(Abe, stop it.)
It is undeniable that Bao Beier is a phenomenon in the entertainment circle that sees big from small.
"Cross-boundary money making" is prevalent, and everyone has the dream of a director.
The point is, it seems that they can't hear negative comments around them. If netizens criticize them, they don't understand the movie.
This bizarre phenomenon can also be seen in Zhang Han .
They kept showing how much effort they put into this work, their determination to present a "masterpiece" to the audience, full of self-moving spirit.
But in the end the audience's perception is often that they tried, but not much.
In other words, always work hard in tricky places, and in the end, the harder you work, the worse you get.
What's worse is that movies are becoming more and more capitalized in these transitions, the real needs of the audience are ignored, and they keep making bad movies. It's their trial and error.
But why should the audience pay? Forced to downgrade consumption?
Even in the end, when we sat in the cinema, we couldn't help but blame ourselves " Chinese movie sucks because I am a garbage audience".
The market has been in need of a sword of Damocles to get these bad film directors "sober up" before all the audience is gone.
Therefore, the Golden Broom Award acted as this villain and became the responsibility of the bad review system in the Chinese film and television industry.
Just like the beginning of the Golden Broom Award, the founder Cheng Qingsong responded to his original intention in a second:
"The original intention of the Golden Broom Award was not to make people come over to make a fool of himself, nor to give people a high hat, or Criticism is like a parade in the street. The original purpose of our establishment is that we sincerely hope that through this award, film institutions and filmmakers will always reflect on their own creations, and try our best to promote the healthy development of Chinese films." "Golden Broom Award" to have, to be bigger and stronger.
Prior to this, the United States had the Golden Raspberry Awards for the purpose of judging bad films. The first session was held in 1981, and it has been held for 38 sessions this year.
is announced every time before the Oscars, US President Reagan , Madonna (15 nominations 7 times), Tom Cruise , Brad Pitt, etc. have all won the Golden Raspberry Award .
and my country's Golden Broom Award is more like a folk version of the Golden Raspberry Award.
The first Golden Broom Awards was held in 2009, which is in the stage of rapid development of Chinese films.
The market at the timeA peculiar phenomenon has appeared on the Internet. Some movies have a poor response from the audience, but the media have applauded them.
Film criticism is increasingly lacking a real voice, so the Golden Broom Award, which exists as a carnival of niche groups, came into being. From 2013 to 2014,
, the box office was high and the reputation of the " small era " series appeared, Guo Jingming , became the target of crowd sentiment.
The Golden Broom coincides with a large number of fans who hate bad movies but have nowhere to complain. The bad reviews of "according to public opinion" have made the Golden Broom Award out of the circle.
Criticism makes progress, but people neither accept nor want to criticize.
"No star to accept the award" also became a feature of the Golden Broom for a time.
It was not until the appearance of Wang Baoqiang , the first A-list star in history to personally accept the award, that the Golden Broom Award was on the verge of being suspended.
In those days, Wang Baoqiang spoke on stage:
I know this is a disgraceful award, but it can spur your progress. Why do I come to pick it up in person, because I love movies, respect movies, and respect audiences...
spoke with sincerity and neatness, making Wang Baoqiang "handsome" on the hot search.
However, the Golden Broom Award is still in the whirlpool of doubts for a long time due to its lack of credibility and authority.
wrote this article with no intention of standing in line.
Because, it doesn't matter if there is Cheng Qingsong.
But the "Golden Broom Award" is very important for Chinese films.
is bustling with fame and fortune, and the entertainment industry has long been unable to withstand criticism.
is generally impetuous, rotten and unaware.
sunk in the self-world of touting each other and overflowing with superiority, and there are too few people who really sink their hearts into producing works.
As director Gao Qunshu said back then, don't give bad films a chance, but force domestic films to be reborn.
Protecting bad movies is a crime against movies.
Our emphasis on the need for the Golden Broom Award is actually calling for the existence of "voices of criticism".
For the market, if you blindly cover your ears and criticism is not allowed, praise is meaningless.
For the audience, if they start to lose their voices and turn a blind eye to the garbage, they can only choose among the garbage in the end.
