Several new films for National Day (2020), I think the best is " Jiang Ziya ". To say it is the best is not because of its dazzling and exquisite 3D effects. As far as the overall production level is concerned, I think the film has a very good blockbuster momentum.
actually doesn't dare to interpret and comment excessively on the theme of the film, as far as my cultural level and sensory cognition are concerned. It is a mature adult blockbuster with many philosophies. Even many adults can't understand the film. It is reasonable for children to watch it at a loss. The storyline of
looks messy, but it's actually very profound. For his so-called saving of the common people, the master deceived the fox clan and the fox demon, created the conflicts in the human world, and then pretended to resolve these conflicts, so as to achieve the purpose of ruling the common people. But the fox demons were deceived, and even Jiang Ziya, who was enthroned as a god, was being deceived. Jiuwei was the villain in the play. She also indicated that she was also a victim of being deceived, but Jiang was sober, he insisted The concept of "How to save the people if you don't save one person" is to save the innocent Xiao Jiu in Jiuwei's body. In the end, she also inspired Shen Gongbao, who was taking care of him, to make him go through fire and water with the god he admired in his heart to be a great hero. The theme of the film is healthy, but the plot is very terrifying, and I dare not comprehend and ponder deeply. Dressed in the coat of animation, I create a fable that is different from myth through myths. smart. In the film, the voiceless master's favorite saying is "everything is for the common people", Jiang Ziya's most resolute statement is "if you don't save one person, how can you save the common people", Xiao Jiu's biggest question is "immortals don't lie to people" Let’s go”, there are also many interesting lines in the film: “Even the fish has been released, why don’t you let yourself go”, “Life is unsatisfactory in all likelihood, you can either see it or admit it”, “Rebirth once you are born” The second time you are familiar with it, if you talk and talk, you will become it”, “It’s not that you don’t have it, it’s that you can’t see it”, “What can’t escape is life, what can’t be broken is love”, “Sacrificing innocent people is the way of heaven” "Is it?", "May there be no more displacement in the world, no more lies and fooling of all living beings, and no more injustice in the world", "One person is like dew, and the common people are like rivers and seas, but in the eyes of the disciples, Xiao Jiu, one person, the common people, there is no one." difference" and so on, it's just too much. I really feel bad for the film, such a good-looking and deep-looking film is not the first in box office revenue, and the five sketches with superficial exaggeration are all deceived themes. Well the result is really good. Of course, there is also deception in "Jiang Ziya", and it is precisely because of the deception of the master that Jiang Ziya's personality has been highly sublimated. For the sake of fame and profit, Lao Jiang has always recognized the death principle of "If you don't save one person, how can you save the common people?" He limited his belief in life to such a seemingly narrow level of understanding, and sacrificed a small part with his master in exchange for it. Doing the ruling concept of obtaining the happiness and tranquility of the majority right has disrupted the great chess game that Master has worked hard to benefit the common people. After reading it several times, I can't figure out which of Jiang and Shizun's point of view is correct, and whose point of view is wrong, or whether both are correct? Wrong? If it's right, how can you save the common people if you don't save even one person? The profound point of the film is to make the audience think constantly, and realize the confusion and truth of the world in thinking, which is in sharp contrast to the beauty of life through deception from the beginning to the end. Deception pierces deceit to express the theme of hope that there will be no more deception in the world, which is undoubtedly positive, but it ignores one point, that is, some deceptions in the world are kind, correct and beautiful, just like those five people who make people laugh for a while A touching sketch that will cry for a while, the line "May there be no more lies to fool in the world" should also be like the sketch, followed by "parentheses, except those that are well-meaning and correct." The biggest failure of "Jiang Ziya" is that it didn't deceive the audience, it didn't deceive the audience to laugh, and it didn't deceive the audience to shed tears. Does the vulgar title of the film also affect the attendance rate to a certain extent? The story of Jiang and a beautiful girl", "The Monster vs. Youdu Mountain", and "The Horror of Returning to the Ruins", will the box office be better? (2020.10.26)
