movie " Hidden Into the Dust ", must the director and screenwriter tell the truth for its plot interpretation? Not at all!
I personally think that the reason why the film was taken off the shelves was not because it filmed the "poverty and backwardness" in the rural areas of the northwest. In the past two years, our country made a promotional film to show it to the world. It's not the problem at all. The movie "Hidden in the Dust" is a story from the 78910s of the last century based on today's time background. It is an old wine in a new bottle. It does not seek truth from facts and magnifies the "darkness of human nature" that should not be magnified.
I came from a rural area, and the relationship between rural people is not so indifferent. It is common to build houses and farm land to help each other, including weddings, funerals, and marriages. But after all, there is a lot of mutual help, the relationship between neighbors is harmonious, and selfishness is by no means the mainstream. Confucius killed Shaozheng Mao, and determined that he had five major crimes, one of which was called "remember ugly and rich", which means that he specialized in memorizing some ugly things, and it was very complicated, and it was widely advertised. In terms of works, this is a taboo, but it is the favorite thing for some literary and art workers throughout the ages, such as the authors of "Jin Ping Mei", "Abandoned Capital", "The Search for Qin Ji", and others will not be listed one by one. Art comes from life, but it can be higher than life. This is the freedom of creation, and it is also the premise for the blooming of artistic works. However, freedom does not mean that there is no bottom line of principles. The thinking of the work must be positive, and the value orientation must not be biased. To serve the people and educate the people as the leading core.
As for those works that deviate from their thinking, it may not be a problem if they are only seen by their own people. How readers make comments should be digested internally, and if they are wrong, they will be corrected, but if other countries who think that looking at the spot is seeing the whole leopard, what happened? manage? What about using it as a weapon to attack China? Besides, are all the villages in the northwest and the whole of China like "Hidden in the Dust"? Sorry, foreigners don't care, the "flattering words" of 's Nobel Prize in Literature to 's Mo Yan's award is the best proof. Fang said that almost the entire article was the anti-epidemic diary I heard from my friend? Chen Kaige's masterpiece "Farewell My Concubine", if there is no description of the period during the Cultural Revolution, can it be an international award? I can't see it! The same is true for Zhang Yimou and , but it was Laomouzi who was scolded, and Master Mo hid behind him.
Nowadays, many people fall into the misunderstanding and are biased by Mo Yan's prejudice. They think that literature can only be criticized, so they have turned into Lu Xun. Those who use the pen as a scalpel to treat people's soul diseases, the core of his work is still positive, optimistic, bright and uplifting, the doctor's benevolent heart and the world, and his personal ideals and abilities are also matched. However, some authors now regard criticism as the inherent or only form of literary and artistic works. They say that there is no classic masterpiece that does not use criticism as the main form of creation. This is really nonsense. How many literary works have you read? Pre-Qin Poetry Han Yuefu Tang Poems and Song Ci Yuanqu How many have you read? Have you read all Ming and Qing novels? You basically confuse criticism with vilification and smearing, thinking that praise and praise are just slapping the horses, so you can't cultivate your own family, and some can't even take care of the lower body. Projecting to magnify the evils of human nature to make suggestions and suggestions to change the country and change the world, their hearts can’t be right, can their works be right? The ambition is too big.
Master Mo has clearly said that who caused the dark description of the era in his pen? Is it the new China's fault? Is the "high praise" of his work by Nobel Prize really because he writes well? Are you sure there is no suspicion of using the spear of the son to attack the shield of the son? Who is to blame? After the disintegration of the Soviet Union, weren't those literary and artistic workers in their country who worshipped the West to deconstruct the Soviet Union? Criticism or praise is just a form of expression of literary works. Clinging to one is not only a prejudice, but a wrong view. May I ask Mr. Lu Xun's famous piece " hometown ", is there only criticism left? inNo compliments?
Chairman Mao's most ideal vision for the new China is "big school", so what he wants to do most in his life is actually to be a teacher.
In 2014 and 2016, two major events happened in the cultural world, one was the "Symposium on Literature and Art" in 2014, and the other was the "Dharma-Hua Debate" in the Buddhist world in 2016. The two events have the same effect, but how much Do people remember what the 2014 Literary Symposium emphasized?
