should come after all, Paris Baguette is considered to be settled by the autumn queen this time.
and the official, under the pressure of public opinion, also gave the latest response, implied that the penalty of 580,000 has been reduced, and if there is any objection, it can be reconsidered. From a legal process perspective, has done everything it can to match popular sentiment.
For Paris Baguette, this is the best comment on the "Blessing is not a blessing", the 580,000 "advertising fee" in the district has made the people of the whole country its true fans, which is more powerful than the last Spring Festival Gala too much. Some netizens on
enthusiastically used the slogan "From now on, choose Paris baguettes when you buy bread", and some people called on to buy out Shanghai's Paris baguettes, and then they went out of control, from Shanghai to Nanjing and then to Beijing, sweeping the country all the way.
This not only shows the public's one-sided attitude towards this incident, but also "repays kindness" from the side. Punishment is punished, law and favor are not rivals after all.
In fact, from a legal point of view, the established rules must not be easily destroyed. Because the basis of the law is order, any exception will become a "hole", which will lead to all kinds of things that are beyond the law. In the
incident, Paris Baguette did objectively relieve the shortage of supplies, and subjectively did not start the price on the ground. At the same time, many netizens said that the starting point was good.
I can only reserve my opinion on this point. If a private company, , violated the epidemic prevention policy and produced privately during the epidemic period, it was so that the residents who were quarantined at home could eat a bite of sweet bread. Wouldn't this be too dramatic? , rather than to maintain the normal operation of the business.
From this point of view, there is nothing wrong with the penalty. In fact, there is no need to worry about whether the starting point is altruistic or self-interested, because we cannot distinguish it from the surface.
Therefore, once it is discovered that it is not tolerated, it is the greatest guarantee of order, otherwise people with ulterior motives can also do dirty things in the name of justice.
On the other hand, after the incident, many netizens began to complain about the law. This is a typical expression of not wanting to use their brains.
and the so-called "not popular", this sentence must be viewed dialectically, must the popular will be beneficial to the people?
If the Paris Baguettes cannot be effectively managed, there will be more and more companies that start work secretly. If there is a chain of epidemic transmission, how many more days will Shanghai be closed and controlled? Who is "at a loss"? Although
didn't happen, it's just a probabilistic event. It's just a matter of time if we don't detect and stop it in time. It's still the same group of people who scold Paris Baguette, what an ironic story. Will
become a milestone in the development of Paris Baguettes? I am pessimistic. Have you seen enough Internet anecdotes that you can kill first and then kill? White elephant instant noodles, , do you still remember? escape the backlash of public opinion.
The real difficulty that Paris Baguette will face is not being fined, but the reversal of public opinion that will appear in the near future, and a small negative incident is enough to kill it.
China's Internet circle is really more exciting than any TV series. Human nature is still naked, but behind the screen, the magic will only intensify.
What do you think of Paris Baguette?
personal independent account, if you think the article is not bad, welcome to like it and follow
Toutiao Creation Challenge Paris Baguette was fined 580,000 for unlicensed production during the epidemic Shanghai responded to Paris Baguette being fined: lighten penalty
