mentioned the DC Universe. If you look at the previous cosmological style, you should actually use one word to summarize it. In the author's opinion, it is "elegant dark temperament". This is actually what Marvel does not have today, but it is embarrassing. However, the current DC is gradually abandoning this label.
actually talks about superhero-themed works. For many domestic fans or movie fans, the first contact is not Marvel but DC. Take a more obvious example-
is in terms of many domestic post-80s or post-90s When I was young, I watched superhero movies or animations, mostly "Batman" and "Superman", especially DC's "Superman" almost occupied the vast majority of my memories of superheroes when I was young.
However, however, DC had a good hand but broke!
Marvel and DC are both dominating existences in the field of superhero themes. They both have a very complete story worldview system, backed by huge plot comics, but now the two sides present diametrically opposite recent developments. With the help of the huge comic world view, Marvel has gradually constructed its own cinematic universe through 11 years of fine paving. Movies are constantly filling the Marvel Cinematic Universe, allowing it to gradually expand and mature.
In contrast, the DC on the other side is often in an awkward situation of "rebooting", "movies and film plots are rarely connected", and "works fighting each other".
so that, in recent years, DC movies have been difficult to construct their own complete movie universe. Although a "Justice League" heralds DC's goal of unifying its own movie universe, everyone who has seen the movie knows that DC movies are very important. The level of care beyond this kind of "pro-son" has seriously affected the entire "Justice League."
Let’s ask, if a fighting force is enough to crush the existence of all other members of the alliance, what do you let other Justice League members do? Set off?
Therefore, the author said that the good hand of the hidden huge market originally occupied by DC movies was basically squandered in the later "confusion".
Marvel can see clearly about this. Perhaps the Marvel movie universe is not the best structure, but Marvel knows what it wants and how it should do it. DC needs to learn from this.
Of course, if DC wants to change its "fragmented" film universe, it must "appropriately" end the "director as the creative center" mechanism. After all, every film director's understanding of the film is even The understanding of the DC movie universe is different.
This is also a direct cause of the fact that DC movies have high-quality works such as the "Dark Knight" trilogy and "Watchmen", as well as the "Justice League" movie quality "uneven" that has been frantically complained by domestic and foreign fans. The reason for the works.
Is "Aquaman" a breakthrough in the DC universe? Do not! It will only ruin the DC universe!
is like the subject of the question, are there any DC movies that Marvel did not do? Obviously, for this answer, the author said at the beginning, DC's "elegant dark temperament" is beyond Marvel. of. The element
is a very critical and core important style label for the DC universe. How many people, including the author, like DC because of the “dark” temperament?
Originally DC did a very good job on this point. Typical examples are the trilogy of "V for Vendetta", "Watchmen", and "Dark Knight". These works not only show the temperament elements unique to DC After coming out, more of them have absorbed some "precision fans".
However, it is true that DC may feel that these "precision fans" are not enough to support themselves, so they started a new experiment, and "Aquaman" is now online.
What needs to be acknowledged for "Aquaman" is that the special effects of the movie are indeed ox-breaking. The "Underwater World" directed by Wen Ziren takes into account the wonderful visual experience and the unknown, so the movie is very beautiful, but then again, you guys Don’t you think such movies are familiar?
This is actually the current style of Marvel movies!
Obviously, DC has a bit of a "quickly rushed to the doctor" rhythm on its own breakthrough. I want to learn Marvel's humorous line of family fun. Although it is still successful, it is notIt's DC, and the only elemental setting that can be called "DC dark temperament" in the entire Sea King is this section of "Trench Clan".
But it is this plot that is purely based on visual effects, not grafted to what should have appeared in the plot.
So this is why the author would say that "Aquaman" may ruin the DC universe, even if it is "Aquaman" with a high box office.
For the DC Universe, what should be done more is to seek a style path that others cannot copy based on its original and natural dark temperament. Once the "Dark Knight" trilogy did it, but DC seems to give up. Up.
We always say that we can’t be a “handan toddler”, but now DC seems to be in such a “handan toddler” situation, this is a very dangerous thing, because just like Marvel’s family fun route, DC’s original dark temperament The route also has a huge market.
It's just that DC's creation system only focuses on "points", and there is no better estimate of "faces". When DC has mastered the method of expanding faces with points, then the rise of the DC universe is a logical matter.
DC works are actually better at digging humanity, which is currently unmatched by Marvel!
As the author said earlier, many of DC's works such as "Watchmen", "Dark Knight 1-2-3", "V for Vendetta" and even "Joker", which was launched this year, are actually doing humanity exploration. Is quite excellent. Marvel has to admit that
is incomparable at this stage.
For "Watchmen", when I watched this movie back then, I saw it as a "superhero" movie at all, but I still couldn't learn it because it was not enough to attract me, and the whole film was full of this kind. Depressed.
Until, when the author got older, I went to watch this movie, only to find that it was the author who really understood the movie this time-the part that
never understood was the unconscious human nature, the whole film was full The feeling of depression is actually the contradiction in the background of the story brought about by the different choices of the characters in the movie. It is the inner growth and change of each character, especially the choice made when Manhattan faces Rorschach at the end of the movie. The most amazing part of the whole movie.
This is not only an ordinary choice, but also a classic DC dark temperament. There are not so many twists and turns, but it can trigger fans’ thinking. For the author, I once asked myself if If you are Rorschach, you will choose how to "adapt to the situation" or choose to do the same behavior as Rorschach in the movie. The author has no answer to the question of
.
This is actually the charm of old DC movies, and this is where Marvel cannot have it, or it needs to be learned.
is another example, "Joker", which was launched this year but cannot be introduced in China-
fans who are familiar with DC know that the clown is the villain, but for the plot setting of how the clown becomes a clown, the current "Joker" is based on "humanity". The contradiction with the real world answers the proposition.
No one wants to be a "joker" at first, but sometimes the world will force you to be a "joker". This kind of dark topic involving human nature is actually a way out for DC to dig deeper.
For more exciting Marvel movie information, Marvel American drama recommendations, Marvel Tucao, please pay attention to the Marvel Film Information Bureau
The picture in this article is from the Internet, invaded and deleted~
