is so wonderful. The whole film does not say that the rich are not benevolent, but the illogical and pure kindness of the president's family is shown to the audience. But in the end, Driver Kim still stabbed the president to death. Maybe this is the idea that the director strongly expressed. Through the final desperate violence, he emphasized class consolidation and the antagonism between classes. In fact, the family of four in the movie are actually people with scheming IQs. They prefer to be lazy and unwilling to use it in the legitimate industry. They live by fraud and abduction, which really verifies the title "Parasite".
Secondly, the hostess setting is nothing but good-looking. The host’s setting is to completely ignore family affairs and self, and the setting of the nanny is to be complacent. Therefore, it is a loophole that only tutoring in the bedroom should be the room. Caused by insufficient. I think the downside is that the contradictory setting is too strange. I can only say that South Korea’s oligarchic economy has really accumulated too much public grievance.
Furthermore, the tutoring department actually feels that my mother intends to let her daughter like tutoring. In fact, South Korea’s patriarchy is very serious. They pay little attention to their daughters. It feels like the mother wants to give her a tutor to pass her feelings, and the daughter is also lack of love. It seems that this movie really has a lot of loopholes, and there is a loophole at the end. I haven't found any crime the male protagonist committed. In addition, this movie is the director’s storytelling, good technique, and enjoyable to watch. But it is absurd and logically unreasonable. The rich are stupid, and the poor are smart. Perhaps it is to enlarge absurdity and give up logic. But when it comes to winning, it feels like a reputation. There are a lot of brutalities in the plot, but I like the way it works well. Ji Ting can't cover the toilet and just sits down and starts smoking. The scene is so beautiful. According to the police analysis, the
case should be that the old housekeeper is missing, her husband retaliates against the new housekeeper, and the new housekeeper (mother) is too defensive. But what is the crime of the male protagonist? From their family’s perspective, at most they deceived the rich, which is not at all Crime, the movie said that forged documents, the hostess of the diploma said that he doesn’t need to read it, at most it is deceived and there is no penalty. According to the plot, the male protagonist should be an accidental victim, because the insider is either dead or himself people. This movie,
, uses flat characters to beautify the rich, and at the same time uses brilliant plots and commercial films as a cover to create an equally unreal and ugly image of civilians. I couldn't realize the helplessness and desperation of the common people. They all had magical powers. With a little movement of their fingers, they found comfortable and high-paying jobs without any flaws. There was no other acceptable explanation for the previous poverty except laziness.
Finally, the technique of this film is impeccable, but I really don’t like it. When we say a story is “unreal”, it’s not that it’s impossible to happen in reality to mean it’s unreal, but this The story is "unreal" when it is not logically expressed in its context. Parasites are like this. The director and screenwriter sacrificed too much for drama. This story is really wonderful, but the traces of design in many places are too deliberate. It is this kind of excessive design and deliberateness that makes it unreal. This kind of story is wonderful, but it is definitely difficult to make people empathetic. This is the biggest problem with parasites in "Parasite", perfect technique, wonderful story, but not empathetic.
