Win the case! Tianxia Bachang sues a publishing house for infringement of "Ghost Blowing Lantern" verdict

movie 589℃

Win the case! Tianxia Bachang sues a publishing house for infringement of 'Ghost Blowing Lantern' verdict - Lujuba

Tianxia Bachang Fang's lawyer Wang Yun issued an article


1905 film news On April 27, Tianxia Bachang (formerly known as Zhang Muye) attorney Wang Yun posted on social platforms that Tianxia Bachang sued the publishing house for infringement of his work "Ghost Blowing Lantern" The copyright case won the second instance. Lawyer Wang Yun of


said, "Another ghost blowing lamp case has been settled! I, as a lawyer in the world, participated in the judgment on the Internet." It is reported that the second trial of Qingdao Publishing House's "latest revision" "Ghost Blowing Lantern" violated the author's right to modify , Constitutes false publicity.


In addition, attorney Wang Yun also mentioned that the key point of this case is that even if the editor of the publishing house believes that the work contains literal errors, the modification should be approved by the author, and the author can still "obtain economic benefits from the use of the work after transferring the copyright property rights." For example, rights protection were filed due to unfair competition in the creation of works by the same people."


Win the case! Tianxia Bachang sues a publishing house for infringement of 'Ghost Blowing Lantern' verdict - Lujuba

"Ghost Blowing the Lamp" series of novels


In 2015, Tianxia Bachang posted on Weibo that it was revising the "Ghost Blowing the Lamp" news, and the publisher modified the content of the novel without authorization. And take the opportunity to promote the upcoming release of the "latest revision" "Ghost Blowing Lantern". Tianxia Bachang sued the publishing house and its partners to the court and claimed 10 million yuan. Recently, the Beijing court publicly pronounced this case of copyright infringement and unfair competition disputes, and ruled that the original verdict was upheld. The publisher should apologize, eliminate the impact, and compensate Tianxia Bashang for mental damage and reasonable expenditure of more than 53,000 yuan.


Tags: movie