movies "The Wandering Earth" and "Nezha: The Devil Boy Comes into the World" are both dark horses at the box office this year, and I personally love these two movies very much.
But the two movies have similar experiences ---both have been exposed the so-called "plagiarism", let us analyze first:
"Wandering Earth" really plagiarism?
"The Wandering Earth" is adapted from the famous science fiction writer Liu Cixin's novel of the same name, but some people claim that the film is suspected of plagiarism, not to mention whether it is really necessary to plagiarize other people’s works as a fiction writer. Search for related content on the Internet and you will find different The media have different opinions on the plagiarism of Wandering Earth. Some people say that it copied the Japanese movie "Demon Star Godzilla", and some people said it copied the work "Earth Escape" by Taiwanese science fiction writer Huang Hai, but when you think about it, these claims are hard to hold. Could these two works also copy each other ?
"The Wandering Earth" is accused of plagiarizing the Japanese movie "Godzilla".
First of all, both of them are sci-fi movies, it's just a disaster for the two, and the presentation is different.
Wandering in the earth is because the sun is about to be destroyed, and "Demon Star Godzilla" is just because the earth is about to collide with a monster called Godzilla, so it has to shift the earth a little bit. How to offset
? This is why some people say that "The Wandering Earth" is a copy of this movie.
These two films both make the earth move by building engines, and then "Wandering Earth" just accelerates the earth to the Centaur galaxy. The various queries on
are more like jealousy of the success of the wandering earth. Many people want to find the black material of "small breaking ball" by all means.
"Nezha: The Devil Child Comes into the World" really plagiarized?
When people think "Wandering Earth" will become the box office crown of 2019, our little Nezha turned out, breaking the box office record of Wandering Earth in one fell swoop, ranking second in Chinese film history with a box office of 4.9 billion. . The movie Nezha is the work of the director Jiaozi for five years. It has become the pride of the current domestic animation movies. It is extremely excellent in terms of screen, special effects, plot, soundtrack, connotation and other aspects. You who are reading the article, may you shed tears for "Zaher", right?
During the film's release, the Weibo blogger "Shi Jinghong" issued a complaint against Nezha's plagiarism. The blogger claimed that the red and blue color schemes in Nezha's movie, Tai Chi Yin and Yang and other elements have plagiarized her creative show " Five-dimensional memory Memory5D+", and released a lot of comparison pictures.
Regarding Nezha's "scandal", most of the netizens are sensible, and they have not been brought into the rhythm. Instead, they chose to stand on Nezha's side and condemned this "Shi Jinghonghuang".
You must know that every movie ticket we contribute to Nezha is to support domestic animation movies to get better and better, not to indemnify some interested people, but whether there is plagiarism, a court decision is needed. Only then can there be a conclusion...
There are more and more cases of "plagiarism" accused of popular films. The following reasons are indispensable:
1. The accused films have excellent box office performance, and they can get a lot of money if they win the case.
2. As long as you complain about popular movies, you can get attention and it will be profitable.
3. Even if you lose the case, you have already caught the heat, and there will be no loss.
Few unfired films have been sued for plagiarism because they are unprofitable... Copyright awareness is important, but copyright cannot be used as a blackmail weapon by some sinister people.
It can be seen that the eyes of the audience are not incapable of good works. Those who are clear are clear, and those who are muddy are muddled. If for profit, discrediting excellent film works is tantamount to lifting a rock and hitting oneself in the foot. . The success of
at the box office shows that it is not plagiarism. Pure plagiarism is hard to have vitality. Of course, it has reference and imitation, but reference imitation is not plagiarism, but reconstruction and creation. Just like building a house, maybe everyone uses reinforced concrete or new materials, and the design creativity used has shadows of ancient and modern China and foreign countries, and maybe even the style is modern, European, or both Chinese and classical, but you Adding different elements, setting up different plots, telling different brilliant stories, and impressing the audience with their unique views, feelings and details, thenIt's the innovation of taking doctrine! Will be recognized by the audience!
