In the early morning of December 4, South Korea's political arena staged a "head-to-head" drama: President Yun Xiyue declared martial law in a high-profile manner, claiming to eliminate "anti-national" forces. However, a few hours later, this decision was quickly "stopped" by the

In the early morning of December 4, South Korea's political arena staged a "head-to-head" drama: President Yin Xiyue declared martial law in a high-profile manner, claiming to eliminate "anti-national" forces. However, a few hours later, this decision was quickly "stopped" by the Congress. .

The incident originated on the evening of December 3, when Yin Xiyue suddenly issued a martial law order, directly accusing opposition members of "sympathizing with North Korea" and claiming that this was a "threat to national security." His tough move caused an uproar, and for a while, South Korean society was filled with tension. However, control of Congress is in the hands of the opposition Democratic Party, and the president's order soon ushered in a strong response.

A few hours later, the South Korean Congress voted to reject martial law with lightning speed. Speaker of the National Assembly Woo Won Shik even publicly declared that Yoon Seok-yue's martial law order was "invalid" and called on the National Assembly to work with the people to protect democracy. Police and troops subsequently evacuated the parliament building. Democratic Party leader Lee Jae-myung is even tougher. He made it clear that until Yin Xiyue officially lifts martial law, Democratic members will collectively stay in the main hall of the National Assembly. "Protecting democracy is the bottom line that we cannot compromise on," Li Zaiming said in a live TV broadcast, which resonated widely in society.

If you had to use one word to describe South Korean President Yoon Seok-yue's performance after taking office, it would be "controversy." From the drastic adjustments in foreign policy to the vacillation of domestic economic reforms, his governing style has undoubtedly added a lot of uncertainty to the future of the South Korean ship. Some people say that he is leading South Korea into a new era of greater independence; others question that his various decisions have led South Korea to a "dangerous path."

Yin Xiyue's governance is like walking on the edge of a cliff. One right move may open up a new situation; one wrong move may plunge the country into an abyss. In the context of increasingly fierce geopolitical competition, how does South Korea seek to survive and develop among the powers? Domestically, in the face of stubborn problems such as high housing prices and high unemployment, can his policies truly alleviate public dissatisfaction?

This article will take you to dig deeper into Yin Xiyue's strategic choices, uncover the hidden worries behind his "pro-US and anti-China" diplomacy, explore the root causes of internal and external troubles in South Korea's economy, and examine the confusing road ahead for him to govern. This is not only related to the fate of South Korea, but may also affect the future direction of Northeast Asia as a whole.

Reshaping the diplomatic route

Since Yin Xiyue took office, South Korea's foreign policy has gradually shown a strong "pro-American" color. Whether in terms of economic cooperation or military alliance, South Korea and the United States have closer ties. From earlier cooperation in the chip supply chain to high-profile participation in the U.S.-led "Indo-Pacific Strategy," this series of actions has clearly demonstrated that South Korea prefers to stand in the U.S. camp in international affairs. However, it is worth noting that such a foreign policy will inevitably come into contact with China.

As South Korea’s largest trading partner, its importance to South Korea’s economy is self-evident. Data shows that nearly a quarter of South Korea's exports go to China, especially in core areas such as semiconductors and semiconductors, and the cooperation between the two countries is deeply integrated. However, the Yin Xiyue government seems to be more inclined to decide the economic route based on political stance, ignore the reality of China-South Korea trade structure, and even openly confront China on certain issues. Regarding this strategy, many analysts pointed out that this diplomatic line of betting solely on the United States may obtain a certain security guarantee in the short term, but in the long term it may plunge South Korea into isolation and economic difficulties.

In the current international situation, South Korea's geopolitical status is particularly important. As an important country in Northeast Asia, South Korea not only has to face security threats from the north, but also needs to find its own development space in the game between China and the United States. However, the Yin Xiyue government does not seem to have found a balance point in this complicated chess game, and prefers to choose a riskier path.

Regarding North Korea policy, Yin Xiyue changed the tone of previous dialogues and emphasized tough counterattacks. However, such a policy has not effectively eased the tension on the peninsula. Instead, it has further intensified South Korean people's concerns about security issues.At the same time, Yin Xiyue's reliance on US military cooperation has also caused some people's concerns about national sovereignty. They believe that South Korea's over-reliance on the United States may cause it to lose its autonomy in major international affairs and become a "tool man" in the game between great powers.

Economic policy dilemmas

In addition to diplomacy, Yin Xiyue's performance in domestic economic policies is also controversial. In recent years, global economic uncertainty has intensified, and South Korea, as an economy highly dependent on exports, faces particularly severe challenges. From the high youth unemployment rate to the people's livelihood problems caused by high housing prices, the Yin Xiyue government seems to be struggling to deliver satisfactory answers in all aspects.

Take real estate policy as an example. South Korea's high housing prices have long been regarded as a chronic problem in people's livelihood, but the reform direction of the Yin Xiyue government has been criticized. Some scholars believe that its policies have not really touched the underlying problems, but have instead further increased the burden on some middle-class families. In the field of enterprise reform, Yin Xiyue tried to encourage investment by large enterprises through tax cuts and other measures, but small and medium-sized enterprises and ordinary workers did not benefit from this, and instead further widened the gap between the rich and the poor.

It is worth noting that South Korea’s economy is also deeply affected by the international situation. As the technological competition between China and the United States intensifies, Korean companies are forced to carefully find a balance between the two. The Yoon Seok-yue government has chosen a one-sided stance in favor of the United States, causing Korean companies to face more obstacles in trade with China. Regarding this phenomenon, there are also criticisms in South Korea, believing that the government's policy does not take into account the impact of China-South Korea economic and trade relations on the country's overall economy.

Public Opinion Crisis

Yin Xiyue’s performance in power has not only been questioned at the policy level, but has also been repeatedly frustrated at the level of public opinion. From the high approval rate at the beginning of taking office to the continuous decline today, the trust crisis faced by the Yin Xiyue government should not be underestimated. According to the latest poll data, Yin Xiyue's support rate is particularly low among the youth group, and this group is precisely the backbone of South Korea's future development.

Public opinion generally believes that the reason why the Yin Xiyue government is in a crisis of public opinion is partly due to its tough stance on hot social issues. On the issue of labor reform, for example, he insisted on pushing for a cap on working hours while ignoring public concerns about overwork and work-life balance. This "head-to-head" approach to governance may demonstrate strong leadership in the short term, but in the long term it intensifies social divisions and opposition.

The governing style and policy choices of the Yin Xiyue government reflect South Korea's current strategic dilemma. From foreign relations to domestic economy, from public opinion support to geopolitical competition, Yin Xiyue is dealing with a complex situation intertwined with multiple contradictions.

It can be said that South Korea is now at a historic crossroads. As a country with an important geographical location and strong economic strength, South Korea has the opportunity to play a greater role in the game between China and the United States.

And Yin Xiyue also attracted his own Blue House curse in the winter of 2024.