By the way, since Charles was crowned King of England, the British media has been harsh on him, complaining that he can neither control his son nor his younger brother.
For example, Prince Harry, who has left the royal family and behaves in various ways in the United States, cannot be restrained.
(Prince Harry is in the United States)
and being unable to control his younger brother refers to Prince Andrew who was involved in the Epstein Loli Island scandal.
Last year, Charles forced Prince Andrew to move. Not only did Andrew disobey the order, but he also seemed to show off to Charles from afar, showing that he did not take the king's brother seriously.
(Prince Andrew is the tougher brother)
In the eyes of many media, Charles’s “kingly prestige” is no different from that of paper, and he is a proper king.
However, in the past two days, some insiders broke the news:
Charles drove away his younger brother, and the younger brother's "cheating" in the end was actually a "bitter ploy" to show outsiders.
This play was directed and acted by Charles from beginning to end. He was the one who chased people away. In the end, it was he who allowed Andrew to "live on" smoothly...
(Charles is suspected of using a "bitter flesh trick" to protect his younger brother)
This The "bitter meat plan" started from last year.
Since Andrew was involved in Epstein’s Lolita scandal, Queen Elizabeth removed Andrew from the royal family in order to give an explanation to the outside world, and then removed his military rank and royal title.
Since then, Andrew's financial resources have dropped sharply, but he still lives in a luxurious royal lodge.
With a rent of 260,000 pounds a year, plus 400,000 maintenance fees, and a security fee of 3 million pounds, the high expenses soon left Andrew unable to make ends meet.
(The Royal Manor where Andrew lives)
So last year, Charles had a legitimate excuse to drive Andrew away. On the grounds that Andrew could not pay the various expenses of the Royal Manor, he forced him to move to the place where Harry had stayed. "Old and broken" live there.
However, Andrew has been refusing to give in, and the delay has been for several months...
At the beginning of this year, Charles was diagnosed with cancer, but instead he became more and more determined to fight with his brother to the end.
Not only did he intensify his efforts to further cut off Andrew's financial resources, he also stopped Andrew's 3 million pounds of private security. Unexpectedly, Andrew would rather die than move away. He would rather owe the money than to put the "old man" in the royal estate. Do it to the end.
(Inside the Royal Manor)
A few months later, not only did Charles fail to drive away Andrew, but Andrew suddenly turned around and found a source of income. With a large amount of money to pay rent and fight lawsuits, he had the strength to stay in the Royal Manor. Keep living!
Because of this incident, several of Andrew's friends even made innuendoes about Charles through the media.
So the question is, where did Andrew get such a huge sum of money?
There are rumors that the financial backer Andrew found is a rich man from the Middle East or a Russian rich man.
In the past two days, a person who has had contact with Prince Andrew’s finances broke the news:
In fact, it was none other than his brother Charles who took action to solve Andrew’s financial difficulties...
(Andrew and Charles)
This "expulsion" Andrew's drama is actually a "double bluff" carefully designed by Charles.
According to this insider, Charles ruthlessly cut off Andrew's financial resources and paralyzed his social life, just to rescue Andrew from the quagmire of the Loli Island scandal.
While he was pretending to expel Andrew, he secretly transferred his private money to Andrew through his own channels.
(Young Charles and Andrew)
In this way, he not only gave the world an explanation (expelled Andrew), but also preserved his brother (Andrew did not really leave).
If all this is true, then it can be said that Charles, who was infamy in the end, paid too much for this family...
(Charles: Paying too much for this family)
This drama seems logically reasonable.
After all, how can an old prince who was expelled from the royal family and riddled with scandals let an unrelated sponsor give him a large sum of money for nothing?
He suddenly had money to pay the rent and the lawsuit. It was most likely that the king's brother helped him solve his financial troubles.
As for why Charles took action to cover all this for Andrew, this person familiar with the matter believes:
After all, family ties are hard to let go, and Charles cannot be cruel to Andrew, nor can he "betray" his brother.
It is said that last month, Charles secretly paid Andrew for living expenses. The total annual living expenses exceeded 1 million pounds, and the security expenses of 3 million pounds were also borne by him.
(A once harmonious family)
Just like when the Queen finally agreed to marry Camilla as the queen for the sake of Charles' happiness.
Now Charles tolerates his younger brother, probably because he wants to imitate his mother and take good care of his younger siblings as an eldest brother. By the way, since Charles was crowned King of England, the British media has been harsh on him, complaining that he can neither control his son nor his younger brother. For example, Prince Harry, who has left the royal family and behaves in various ways in the United States, cannot be restrained. (Prince Harry is in the United States) and being unable to control his younger brother refers to Prince Andrew who was involved in the Epstein Loli Island scandal. Last year, Charles forced Prince Andrew to move. Not only did Andrew disobey the order, but he also seemed to show off to Charles from afar, showing that he did not take the king's brother seriously. (Prince Andrew is the tougher brother) In the eyes of many media, Charles’s “kingly prestige” is no different from that of paper, and he is a proper king. However, in the past two days, some insiders broke the news: Charles drove away his younger brother, and the younger brother's "cheating" in the end was actually a "bitter ploy" to show outsiders. This play was directed and acted by Charles from beginning to end. He was the one who chased people away. In the end, it was he who allowed Andrew to "live on" smoothly... (Charles is suspected of using a "bitter flesh trick" to protect his younger brother) This The "bitter meat plan" started from last year. Since Andrew was involved in Epstein’s Lolita scandal, Queen Elizabeth removed Andrew from the royal family in order to give an explanation to the outside world, and then removed his military rank and royal title. Since then, Andrew's financial resources have dropped sharply, but he still lives in a luxurious royal lodge. With a rent of 260,000 pounds a year, plus 400,000 maintenance fees, and a security fee of 3 million pounds, the high expenses soon left Andrew unable to make ends meet. (The Royal Manor where Andrew lives) So last year, Charles had a legitimate excuse to drive Andrew away. On the grounds that Andrew could not pay the various expenses of the Royal Manor, he forced him to move to the place where Harry had stayed. "Old and broken" live there. However, Andrew has been refusing to give in, and the delay has been for several months... At the beginning of this year, Charles was diagnosed with cancer, but instead he became more and more determined to fight with his brother to the end. Not only did he intensify his efforts to further cut off Andrew's financial resources, he also stopped Andrew's 3 million pounds of private security. Unexpectedly, Andrew would rather die than move away. He would rather owe the money than to put the "old man" in the royal estate. Do it to the end. (Inside the Royal Manor) A few months later, not only did Charles fail to drive away Andrew, but Andrew suddenly turned around and found a source of income. With a large amount of money to pay rent and fight lawsuits, he had the strength to stay in the Royal Manor. Keep living! Because of this incident, several of Andrew's friends even made innuendoes about Charles through the media. So the question is, where did Andrew get such a huge sum of money? There are rumors that the financial backer Andrew found is a rich man from the Middle East or a Russian rich man. In the past two days, a person who has had contact with Prince Andrew’s finances broke the news: In fact, it was none other than his brother Charles who took action to solve Andrew’s financial difficulties... (Andrew and Charles) This "expulsion" Andrew's drama is actually a "double bluff" carefully designed by Charles. According to this insider, Charles ruthlessly cut off Andrew's financial resources and paralyzed his social life, just to rescue Andrew from the quagmire of the Loli Island scandal. While he was pretending to expel Andrew, he secretly transferred his private money to Andrew through his own channels. (Young Charles and Andrew) In this way, he not only gave the world an explanation (expelled Andrew), but also preserved his brother (Andrew did not really leave). If all this is true, then it can be said that Charles, who was infamy in the end, paid too much for this family... (Charles: Paying too much for this family) This drama seems logically reasonable. After all, how can an old prince who was expelled from the royal family and riddled with scandals let an unrelated sponsor give him a large sum of money for nothing? He suddenly had money to pay the rent and the lawsuit. It was most likely that the king's brother helped him solve his financial troubles. As for why Charles took action to cover all this for Andrew, this person familiar with the matter believes: After all, family ties are hard to let go, and Charles cannot be cruel to Andrew, nor can he "betray" his brother. It is said that last month, Charles secretly paid Andrew for living expenses. The total annual living expenses exceeded 1 million pounds, and the security expenses of 3 million pounds were also borne by him. (A once harmonious family) Just like when the Queen finally agreed to marry Camilla as the queen for the sake of Charles' happiness. Now Charles tolerates his younger brother, probably because he wants to imitate his mother and take good care of his younger siblings as an eldest brother.