Daolang's comeback has been controversial, and he has been the focus of real-name reports of plagiarism. Not long after Daolang's comeback, there have been constant turmoil. From the Yunduo incident to the current real-name plagiarism report, it seems that everyone is trying

Daolang's comeback has been a source of controversy, and he has been the focus of real-name reports of plagiarism.

Daolang has been in turmoil not long after his comeback. From the Yunduo incident to the current real-name plagiarism report, it seems that everyone is trying to gain a wave of traffic.

This time, a Xinjiang musician who calls himself Wang Jinlan reported Daolang for plagiarizing her work through a real-name video, pushing him to the forefront again.

Well-known music critic Guo Zhikai also expressed his own opinions on this, making the truth even more confusing.

Wang Jinlan’s real-name report caused fans to question

Wang Jinlan was emotional in the video, holding his ID card and accusing Daolang of plagiarizing twenty of her works, and claimed that Daolang used these works to gain fame and fortune, and even bought a house. Wang Jinlan's precise words in the video made many netizens question Daolang's character.

However, Daolang’s fans still choose to believe him, thinking that Wang Jinlan’s video is more like a premeditated script.

In the video, Wang Jinlan not only dodges her eyes, but also looks left and right, as if she is reading a manuscript.

In addition, she also mentioned the chief screenwriter Dong Jiansheng and editor Yi Guangming of "Xinjiang Metropolis Daily" and others, saying that they packaged Daolang as a singer and used their power to deprive her of her right to speak. Wang Jinlan's accusation involves many aspects, making the entire incident more complicated.

Guo Zhikai’s comments intervened, and the truth became confusing.

After learning about the incident, the well-known music critic Guo Zhikai published multiple videos in succession to comment.

Guo Zhikai said that he believed that Daolang’s songs were indeed plagiarized, but the target of plagiarism was himself, not Wang Jinlan.

Guo Zhikai claimed that Daolang plagiarized seventy-five of his works, not twenty.

Guo Zhikai’s statement shocked netizens and triggered more discussions.

Guo Zhikai also popularized the process of song creation and release, and advised Wang Jinlan not to release a video to accuse Daolang without evidence. This is a false accusation and infringes on the rights of celebrities. Guo Zhikai's intervention made the incident even more confusing and made netizens even more confused.

The truth needs to be revealed, treat the storm rationally

Daolang has been in constant turmoil since his comeback. From the Yunduo incident to the current real-name plagiarism report, every turmoil affects the hearts of countless netizens. Wang Jinlan’s real-name report and Guo Zhikai’s comments make the truth increasingly confusing.

Daolang’s team also responded quickly and issued a statement stamped with the company’s seal, indicating that it was willing to take responsibility for the content in the statement.

hopes that relevant departments can intervene in the investigation as soon as possible and give the public a clear answer. If Daolang really committed plagiarism, he should be punished as he should; if Wang Jinlan's accusation is false, Daolang should also be cleared.